Amethyst Initiative Essays

The idea of lowering the drinking age from twenty one years old to eighteen years old is an issue that has been talked about and debated for many years. Some people believe that if one is old enough to vote for our next leader, they should be able to make the choice to drink. Others believe that an eighteen year old brain is still too underdeveloped to be able to take alcohol. There are many positives and negatives to passing this policy to lower the age for drinking. However, this policy will do

Should the Drinking Age Be Lowered? Eighteen, that magical age, everyone has dreamed about turning. The number eighteen is significant in America because it is when teenagers are finally given the chance to become independent. Finally, you are no longer viewed as a child in the America, but as an adult. You can finally enjoy the same rights and privileges as other adults. When you are eighteen you have to ability to buy virtually anything you desire, eat anything you want, smoke anything you want

Most people would think that lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18 would be a bad idea. Giving older teens the legal privilege of drinking just doesn’t sound right, but in fact it is a good idea and should be changed. The drinking age should be lowered to 18 for various reasons because turning 18 makes a person an adult in the eyes of the law and adults should be given the choice to consume alcohol. There are many positive and negative aspects when it comes to changing the drinking age which are

As we all know the eligibility for being able to vote is 18, this is because people thought that at this age teenagers are more mature and can make decisions for themselves. Election day is very important because we are being able to vote for a president and propositions for our country. However, 16 and 17 year old’s aren’t granted the right to vote despite the 1-2 year difference. Most people see it as, since they aren 't 18 yet, they are immature and don’t know what 's for their own good. If 16

The changing of the legal drinking age from 18 to 21 resulted from the false politicization of the very serious and prevalent issue of teenage drunk driving by activist groups such as M.A.D.D.-Mothers Against Drunk Driving. Instead of trying to legislate morality, which is a lost cause, the focus should be put on attempting to create a society which breeds responsible drinking habits. Since there is no significant change developmentally from the age 18 to 21, those three years are, in essence, a

One issue that I feel passionate about is the drinking age. I think that 21 is too old, however, I think that 18 is too young. It it were up to me I would make the drinking age 20. To start, 20 is a good age to allow people to begin drinking because once you hit 20 you are no longer a teennager. Even though 18 is legally when you become an adult, you are still a teenager, which means you are not an adult. As soon as you turn 20 you are no longer a child, and can officially be considered an adult

It is evident that the National Minimum Drinking Age Act should be repealed because the law’s reasoning is flawed, eighteen is considered the age of adulthood, and a decreased drinking age will lessen teenagers’ dangerous drinking habits. Before the flaws in the National Minimum Drinking Age Act are exposed, it is necessary to understand details about the law’s history in addition to how it works. Legislators began pushing for a uniform drinking age after some states reduced their age of adulthood

“You got to realise that when I was 20 years old, I had a house, a Mercedes, a Corvette and a million dollars in the bank before I could buy alcohol legally,” Dr. Dre, a very successful record producer, executive producer, rapper, CEO, and entrepreneur once said. The minimum legal drinking age of 21 should be lowered because as adults, 18 year olds should have the right to drink, lowering the MLDA(minimum legal drinking age) would dwindle the thrill of breaking the law to drink alcohol, and countries

Should the Drinking Age Be Lowered? At this moment in the United States, a popular topic being debated is whether the legal drinking age should be lowered. Lowering the drinking age is not as easy as it seems, though. It is a matter of both state government and federal government, because in 1984 the National Minimum Legal Drinking Act (MLDA 21), a federal law, was put into effect, which required all state to have a minimum legal drinking age of 21 years old. If states did not comply with the act

The drinking age in America is currently set to the age of twenty-one, but should it really be? Day-after-day people abuse this law and partake in underage drinking; however, these people who abuse the law are considered adults. Eighteen, nineteen, and twenty-year-old citizens are given the responsibilities of being an adult, should they not also be given the rewards of being an adult? That is why the drinking ages should be lowered from the age of twenty-one to the age of eighteen. In 1984 U.S

“On average 4,300 young adults are killed each year from underage drinking” (Underage Drinking Statistics). There are two different thoughts on how to alter this high statistic. The first concept is to keep the minimum drinking age at 21; the other method is to lower the age to 18. Keeping the minimum drinking age at 21, individuals would be safe from the threat of an underdeveloped brain and less fatal accidents. Keeping the minimum drinking age at 21 may be a very controversial subject but it

Advocates and supporters of lowering the MLDA 21 to 18 allows young adults the right to make decisions about the consumption of alcohol. As the age of 18 entails an individual to legally become a young adult, receiving the “[rights] and responsibilities [required] to vote… and purchase cigarettes…” (Chiappetta), being prosecuted and tried as an adult, serve on juries, getting married, and drafting to the military – in which dangers the lives of themselves and others surrounding them. As lowering

The continuous dispute of the legal age of alcohol consumption in The United States is nothing fresh. Some citizens may stand with the decision that the current drinking age of 21 fits our society well and shall continue. Many others have examined the existing laws for this matter, and with a respectable purpose. It is not essential to be 21 years of age to lawfully consume alcohol. Think about this: Have you ever unlawfully ingested alcohol? Why did the legal drinking age go from 21 to 18, and back

When a child turns 18, they open to many more responsibilities than any other teenage birthday. When a child is 18, they are not considered a kid anymore, they are adults. One of the many perks of being 18 is kids can vote and they can enlist in the army. In 1984, President Reagan had signed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, and this required all states to set the drinking age to 21. If an 18 year old can enlist in the army, and put their life at risk they should be able to drink alcohol at

Free healthcare for everyone I believe everyone deserves to be given free healthcare if they can not afford it. Plenty of people are dying because we don’t have coverage for everyone.More people are needing universal healthcare and we should be able to give it to those in need.This is making us look so bad to other countries. We should care for everyone who lives in our country even if we don’t know each other. None one should ever be left behind to suffer or see other people suffer from something

that we should rise the drinking age. He wrote an article for CNN in 2009 that makes a case for raising the drinking age. This article is call “Drinking Age 21 Doesn’t Work.” This essay like the first one was written in response to the Amerthyst Initiative. A public statement sign by 100 plus college president to lower

Minimum Legal Drinking Age 1 These passages present a discussion about arguments concerning the lowering of the legal drinking age from 21 to 18. This is an important debate to parents because of the inherent dangers of alcohol. The two positions argue whether or not people under the age of 21 should be given the legal right to drink. Both viewpoints have valid claims warranting consideration. For example, evidence indicates that people under the age of 21 are responsible enough to drink alcohol

The Natural Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 has effectively established the drinking age to be 21 in order to drink alcohol in all fifty states. According to the National Minimum Drinking Age Act this law has saved 17,000 on the highways since 1988, and I believe this law should remain. 18-year-olds should not be allowed to drink. At the age of 18 one should not be allowed to drink alcohol because of the maturity level, increasing rates of car accidents and alcohol poisoning. Of course, many will

Why the drinking age is set the way that it is? The national drinking age act of 1984 stated that among 18-20 year old in areas where the drinking age had been lowered have more opportunities of having an accident. Some collage contend that by lowering that drinking age college would be able to bring booze out into the campus and educate students on responsible consumption. For a while Louisiana was a safety place for thirsty teens to drink until the state passed a law that made illegal to buy alcohol

If our country already experienced a lower drinking age and it’s terrifying impact on people’s lives, why would we want to experience it again? The minimum legal drinking age is one of the most researched laws in the United States today. The minimum legal drinking age should stay at the age of 21. There are many different reasons and facts to support the idea of keeping the drinking age the same, which include binge drinking in colleges, alcohol use in other countries, and drunk driving statistics