Intentionality Essays

and the way he holds them , his gestures , limbs, gaze , thought, skin, which escape from under the identity of his substance , which like a torn sack is unable to contain them. ("Reality and its Shadow" 135) The intellectual structure of intentionality is preceded by direct sensuous contact. It is not a being-toward-death that conditions the form of the book, but the veracity of saying and unsaying whose exposure is described in directly corporeal terms, as an act denuding itself of its skin

The modern era can be categorized as a period in which power, and its structures, dispersed. No longer could one identify discrete institutions, organizations, or individuals who held a majority of power over the common people. While in the past, feudalism, the church, and the king governed much of an individual’s conduct, the modern era, marked by the emergence of modern, industrial capitalism, diffused this power among many different institutions, organizations, and individuals. Foucault’s Discipline

Consciousness in the Mind versus the Computer: Searle’s Argument There is a view in philosophy that the brain and artificial intelligence are one in the same thing, this theory is called Computational Theory of Mind. It proposes that the human mind is an information processing system, thinking is just computing because the theory also says that the brain is just a computing machine. One philosopher Searle calls this “strong artificial intelligence,” or A1. The consequence to this view is that the

Interpersonal Communication Introduction Communication is simply the act of exchanging information from one place to another. Interpersonal communication is the method by which people exchange thoughts, feelings, and meaning in the sequence of verbal and non-verbal messages: it is face-to-face communication. Interpersonal communication is not just concerning what is truly said - the speech utilized - but how it is said and the non-verbal messages dispatched across tone of voice, facial expressions

I intend to provide a critical assessment of the Theory of Intentionality. The term intentionality is of medieval Scholastic origin. It was rehabilitated by the philosopher Franz Brentano and later adopted by Edmund Husserl. Intentionality is a central topic in the philosophy of mind in general, and in Husserl’s phenomenology in particular. It lies at the heart of Husserl’s philosophy. To a great extent, Husserl’s theory of intentionality is the same as his phenomenology. Phenomenology deals with

Should intentionality be considered within the analytical framework of art history? This is unquestionably a pertinent question for the discipline of art history, for the Intentional Fallacy has caused the study of intent to be questioned and, sometimes, avoided by scholars of art history. Of course, once the study of intent is questioned, the recognition of some of the more prevalent factors of intentionality must also be placed under scrutiny, too. This question is particularly pertinent in terms

In his article, Searle discusses two statements. The first is that intentionality in humans is caused by features of the brain, so certain processes in the brain are satisfactory for intentionality. The other statement he discusses is that a computer program can never have intentionality. Searle states that ‘strong AI’ demands that any programmed computer displays intentionality similar to human’s. With arguments he gives, the goal is to show that this is not the case. The argument he uses, is

to ‘make sense of and predict the behaviour of any creature’ (Heil 1998:156). Then I will whether minds can be defined as a property of intentional system and finally, I will attempt to show that Dennett’s position is that of a reductionist. Intentionality can be defined as the directedness of one's mental states or acts or it can be said to be

capable of “thinking” as humans and he developed the Chinese Room to support his theory (Searle). The Chinese Room argument is meant to prove that strong artificial intelligence does not have human intelligence. Searle describes this as human intentionality (Searle). The Chinese Room argument involves a person, fluent in English only, sitting in a room. The person is given two sets of Chinese writing and a “rule book” to associate the two sets. The person does not know Chinese and is not able to

hopelessness (just the thinker knows with assurance the substance of his idea), crude tangible experience), and so on. In any case, philosophers say that one unambiguous trademark is fundamental to mental acts: intentionality. Intentionality is alternate directedness of a mental demonstration. Intentionality is the aboutness of an idea. When I think about the climate, or about my supervisor, I 'm thinking about something or somebody other

In describing the nature of the mind, physicalist theories seem to be the least satisfying in providing comprehensive explanation. Out of the physicalist theories discussed in class, I find functionalism to be the most logical and thus would like to make a few assertions in negation to this theory. I contend that functionalism fails to explain epiphenomena in mental states that can otherwise be explained more logically in other theories (i.e. property dualism), and thus we must reject it. I will

Firstly, the agency and intentionality of both the performers and the audience who made deliberate attempts to say and represent different things. The audiences’ intentions in general were to provide support for the band in recognition of their musical and performance abilities as

speaker would deem to be correct, this does not mean the person understands Chinese, but merely the instructions in English directed the person allows them to generate viable responses. Searle continues with stating that understanding requires intentionality and machines may have calculating capacities, but may not have their own intrinsic intention that reflect mental states (11). Given this information, it would be accurate to assume Searle would think Rachael does have a mind after finding out

friend of Dorothy?”. More examples the movie being perceived as a queer film are Victor Fleming, the film maker, being rumored to be bisexual off screen, and the movie being widely adopted by the queer/gay community. The Wizard of Oz had the intentionality to make fun of the common misconceptions and stereotypes of the queer community at the time. Also, the concept of “over the rainbow” was a hint of being in a place you can be able to be openly queer. This phrase has been adopted

the theory addresses are: the caring healing moment, intentionality and interdependence. In regards to the first factor, it is evident that Abraham Maslow offered inspiration to Watson who later came up with the concept. It mainly indicates that nurses should focus more on the higher order needs compared to lower order necessities, since this will enable them to offer the love and affection that ailing individuals desire. Secondly, intentionality creates an intent to act on something. It ensures that

induction. The 5 key concepts of phenomenology concepts outlined by Merleau–Ponty in the introduction of Phenomenology of Religion (Bettis 1969) can be applied to art therapy (Carpendale, 2002). These concepts are: description, reduction, essence, intentionality and

Romeo and Juliet, and Twelfth Night. What influence him to write plays that would redefine English literature. Apart from the historical inaccuracy, Shakespeare in Love explores the notion of author intentionality in the play. Shakespeare in Love confirmed the intentional fallacy of the author intentionality criticism through historical the reinterpretation of historical events. One of the most popular controversial theory surrounding Shakespeare is the possibility that much of his work didn’t originate

Although it may appear to the Chinese-speaking people outside of the room that whoever is inside can speak Chinese, we are aware that he most certainly cannot. This system of input and output cannot explain reason or intentionality to what is taking place. Thought cannot be reduced to a set of syntactic rules on the mere basis of input/output algorithm without oversimplifying the entire process of the mind. Another important question comes up when discussing Functionalism

is a philosopher who questions if computers can think. Searle believes that both physical things and mental things exist. He believes that there are four mental features of human existence that need to be accounted for, these are consciousness, intentionality, subjectivity and mental causation. Searle has two interesting arguments for materialism. The first is that Mental phenomena are all caused by processes going on in the brain, and that pain and mental things are just features of the brain. Knowing

In his essay “Minds, Brains, and Programs”, John R. Searle argues that a computer is incapable of thinking, and that it can only be used as a tool to aid human beings or can simulate human thinking, which he refers to as the theory of weak AI (artificial intelligence). He opposes the theory of strong AI, which states that the computer is a mind and can function similarly to a human brain – that it can reason, understand, and be in different cognitive states. Searle does not believe a computer can