Youth Criminal Justice Act Essays

never crminal offenders. The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), as Canadians know today, as we know it today, was only sometimes the YCJA. It all started as the Jjuvenile Ddelinquent Aact (1908-1984), which then evolved into the Yyoung Ooffender's Aact (1984-2003) and finally evolved into the YCJAyouth criminal justice act (2003-present). The YCJAS's prmary goal is to protect the community by holding Canadian youth accountable, rehabilitating and reintegrating youths back into society, and preventing

response to the concerns of having one of the highest youth incarceration rates in the world in the late 1990s, Canada introduced the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) to counteract the high incarceration rates and to put an emphasis on extra-judicial measures (EJMs) to deter youth from the criminal justice system. While the YCJA has shown success, and to have strike a balance that the Act’s predecessors were lacking, it still has underlying issues. Youth whom are most vulnerable, such as those with mental

The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) is a Canadian law that was established in 2003, replacing the Young Offenders Act. The YCJA was created with the intention of promoting rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders, as well as ensuring that they are held accountable for their actions. The act recognizes that youth are still developing and should be treated differently than adult offenders. In this essay, we will explore the key aspects of the YCJA and how it has affected the Canadian justice

The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) was put in place to protect society and decrease the risk of crimes for young persons from ages 12 – 17. The Act, introduced on April 1st 2003, was brought in to enforce consequences for youth. The consequences were more relaxed than the previous act and they need to be made stronger, while continuing to recognize different consequences for different crimes. Methods of penalization should be used to direct the youth into adulthood and maturity. This also gives

How the Youth Criminal Justice Act works well to deter juvenile crime One large aspect of Canadian law is the Youth Criminal Justice Act. The Youth Criminal Justice Act is an act which respects the criminal justice for young people. Youth ages twelve to seventeen are protected under the Youth Criminal Justice Act if they have committed a crime. There has been much debate over the act because some people believe the act is too easy on youth, so youth get away with the crimes they commit. The

Is the Youth Criminal Justice Act fair and equitable? A problem society has faced since the beginning of time has been justice and whether it is fair or not ? However, one piece of Canadian legislation called the Youth Criminal Act has made a huge impact on increasing the equity and fairness of the treatment of youth offenders around the country.In the essay I will duscuss the fairness based on the reasons of Rehabilatation,Uniqe systems and through community involvement.

Eventually someone finds him in a wooded area. He has major head injuries determined to be caused from blunt trauma. Your son passes away because of somebody else's poor decisions. You want justice but you know that the culprit will never be charged. Why? Because he is ten-years-old and under the Youth Criminal Justice Act you must be at least twelve to be charged or

Find two news articles published in the last year about the Youth Criminal Justice Act or Youth Crime in Canada. List them below, give a brief summary of the main points of the article (5 W’s) and a brief explanation of your opinion as to whether or not justice was served. Article 1: Woman Gets Youth Sentence For Fatal Crash Source: http://www.cjob.com/2015/07/08/woman-gets-youth-sentence/ Summary: A young woman who was speeding, drinking, and texting and killed two teens in 2010. 5 years later

the Young Offenders Act and the youth Criminal justice Act, Aid Young offenders that are trying to reintegrate into society after being released. This matter can prove to be very important to the courts due to simply to the fact that if there is a higher and the most successful rate of offender reintegration in Canada, there will be a significant decrease in the yearly youth crime statistic because of the fewer amounts of youth re-offenders. According to the Department of justice Canada( 2009), “Under

Implementing Restorative Justice Proposal: for the purposes of considering another course of action to court sentencing of juveniles indicted with criminal acts. I. Inadequacies and deficiencies with the present justice system A. Justice Goals are based on Retributive model as opposed to Restorative 1. Trend to sentencing 2. Lack of Offender accountability 3. Neglect of victims B. Benefits to Restorative Justice Model 1. Makes the offender take more responsibility for their part

In a recent media article, Introduction: The Youth Criminal. Justice Act — A new era in Canadian juvenile justice?, the authors talk about what at-risk youth suffered before the signing of the YCJA. For example, a lot of juvenile offenders went to court without a representation because they either couldn’t afford one or they demonstrated little to no knowledge of the criminal justice system. This ties into the issue I’m addressing because it talks about the lack of investment the federal and provincial

The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) serves as the legislative cornerstone for Canada's juvenile justice system. Governments, police, attorneys, judges, and others are collaborating closely with communities and families across the nation to prevent youth crime and guarantee a just and efficient juvenile justice system. According to the Canadian Constitution, the administration of the criminal justice system is the provinces' and territories' responsibility. Although the federal government is in

acknowledged youth criminal acts from an early age and the ways of dealing with it has varied greatly throughout the years. The YCJA is the most balanced act of all, since it is not as lenient as the one before it but not as strict as the first one. The three main acts that have structured Canada’s youth crime department are The Juvenile Delinquents act, The Young Offender’s act, and The Youth Criminal Justice Act.   In 1908 the first big act was established, known as the Juvenile Delinquents Act. This

Restorative justice is an integral component in decision making and occurs at various levels of the criminal justice procedure comprising the activities that follow conviction. The restorative form of justice can also be an imperative part of the sentencing disposals, particularly when dealing with the youths. The restorative justice is very common today and is applied mostly before a case is subjected to the court (Worrall, 2003). Prosecutors get their guide in sections 7 and 8 of the Code for Crown

Is the Youth Criminal Justice fair and equitable? For the most part, yes. The Act is an important issue to the lives of canadians, focusing on the youth in our communities. People have been questioning though, is the Act to easy on the youth, or easy to slip through the legal cracks. Others say that the YCJA is doing just fine, and that the children affected deserve mercy that the act provides. Personally, I think that harsher punishments may be necessary, or else the youth will never learn. The

This essay will focus on the extrajudicial diversions that aim to keep youth out of the corrosive and crime-inducing youth criminal justice system. It will be argued that it is not helpful to restrict the use of extrajudicial measures (s. 4-9) under the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) to non-violent offenders while specifically authorizing a custodial sentence for youth found guilty of a violent offence (s. 39(1)(a)), especially given the broad defintion of a violent offence under (s. 2(1)). A

What is seen as deviant and criminal behaviour has been redefined numerous times throughout history. Some sociologists argue that deviance has been around since before the time of Christianity, madness (Deviance) was seen as a sign of demonic/supernatural possession. Similarly, with the Ancient Greeks who also saw deviance as a sign of something demonic or angelic. Furthermore, with the rise of prominent theorists/sociologists such as Émile Durkheim and Edwin Lemert, sociologists have established

IS THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT TOO LENIENT ON YOUTHS? The Youth Criminal Justice Act is the federal legislation that replaced the young offenders act in 2003. The Department of Justice defines the act by stating: It is the law that governs the Canadian youth justice systems.It applies to youth who are at least 12 years old but under the age of 18, who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. The three main topics in which I believe

juvenile justice system is the area in criminal justice where one can’t be responsible for the crimes they commit due to their age. In most states, the cut off age for this system is 18 years old. One might say that the juvenile justice system has come a long way since the early 1800s. Back then, youth that committed criminal acts were treated the same as adults. There was no system to punish the youth properly. Only during the era of social changes when immigration increased is when the youth then began

law. However there is one major area that has gotten very little change when it comes to fair justice for all. Racial inequality in the criminal justice often gets ignored because it does not affect most people. Racial disparities affect both innocent and guilty minorities. Although African Americans have fought against racial inequality during the civil rights era, yet decades later a broken criminal-justice system has proven that we still have a long way to go in achieving racial equality. Black and