The most recent change broadening civil liberties came through a June 2016 U. S. Supreme Court decision in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health, Et Al. which affirms the equal opportunity to marry for members of the LGBT community. What is your opinion of this decision? What is your opinion of the backlash/pushback from some state government officials, individuals, and businesses in the private sector? How is this decision similar to the civil rights decisions of the 1950's and 1960's, or is it entirely different
As we know it federal laws are superior to state laws due to the supremacy clause in article VI, section 2 in the constitution. This means that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment is
…show more content…
The community is still in somewhat of a state of shock and resistance. They see gay couples as abnormal, instead of as a human being that lives differently than them. The community believes that their religious freedom is being stressed or threatened by gay couples, mainly because the judeo christian sacred bond of marriage between a man and a woman. Government officials, especially those that are tied to popular elections such as the House or Senate will most likely voice an opinion based off their voter base. If their voter base is heavily conservative christians they will most likely oppose this decision for personal ideology and having re election on their mind. As far as the private sector goes, I find it hard to give a clear answer. For example, the several court cases regarding wedding cakes and gay couples, is it the right of a business owner to refuse service to a gay couple because it will go against their religious beliefs, or is it unconstitutional for businesses to discriminate against someone for their sexual preference? What takes priority, religious freedom or equal treatment to