More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the significance of the electoral college
Essay on the significance of the electoral college
Advantages of electoral college
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the significance of the electoral college
Walter E. Williams discuss how Hillary Clinton blamed the electoral college for her losing the presidential election. Williams stated that many individuals believed that the electoral college is dangerous when it comes to American politics. Individuals also claims that there are three electoral votes, or one electoral vote per 200,000 people in the state of Wyoming which was another factor that weight in the presidential election. In California, one electoral vote equals 715,000 people. Williams also stated that there a lot of individual who complain about using the electoral college since they believe that it’s undemocratic.
6- In the 2004 Presidential election Kerry carried the state, the popular vote was 6,745,485 for Gore and 5,509,826 for Bush. It was not close, Kerry had a large advantage. 7-
The margins of victory were so close in so many states that it would be impossible to prove who truly won. Many people influenced the outcome of the 2000 election, including the Supreme Court Justices. Gore respectfully won the popular vote, while Bush took home the glory. The number of votes for each party in Florida were so close that recounts were demanded immediately. Many counties in the state of Florida faced mass confusion as the layout of the ballots for the election of 2000 left many voters confused and unsure of how they actually voted.
There was an issue with counting the ballot in most parts of Florida. The role my candidate played was not a huge one looking at the results as usual with third party candidates there was no electoral college votes that he received. When it came to the general election he received (2.74%) of the vote. For multiple years it was hypothesized that the cost Al Gore the election ,but that was later debunked by a 2010 article called the . ( Disinfo).
The distribution of electoral votes acts as though less people live where they do, and more people live where they don’t, meaning that in the vast majority of states citizens are either over- or underrepresented (Document A). By beginning to distribute electoral votes based on Congressional representatives, the Electoral College gives an unfair advantage in voting power to citizens of smaller states, and reduces the voting power held by larger states. In short, the Electoral College essentially deems that some residents are worth more than others. The elections of 1980 and 1992 must once again be taken into consideration as, between them, 25,463,258 votes, cast by citizens of the United States, were completely dismissed by the Electoral College (Document B). While neither of the candidates would have won, the fact that the votes of citizens can be so blatantly ignored is troubling.
In the 1992 presidential election the candidate that got the most swing state votes also won the election; out of 17 swing states for that year Clinton, the winner, won 11 of them. For every rule there is an exception and the 1996 presidential election is just that. President Clinton ended up winning the election over all; however his opponent won in the swing states. Clinton was only able to win his second term because he won 31 out of 50 states over all. During the following national election, 2000, Bush won the swing states by 72,949 votes.
After watching the movie “Recount” about the 2000 presidential election, a lot of flags were raised to me. It seemed like a hectic attempt of each party to get what they wanted and a rigged recount by those for the Republican candidate George W. Bush. The election of 2000 took place on November 7, 2000 and was between Democratic candidate Al Gore and Republican candidate George W. Bush. All seemed well in this election and it was a very close race which is why it was so controversial. In this close race, many elderly voters (mainly in Palm Beach) were mistakenly voting for Pat Buchanan, thinking that they were choosing Al Gore.
Based off the notes i took and looking at the numbers over and over, I have come to the conclusion that the election between G.W. Bush and Al Gore was not legitimate. If they did a recount in all the counties in Florida and finished on time then it would have easily shown that Al Gore was the true winner and should have been president of the United States. All that G.W. Bush did was help and make his people stop Al Gore from recounting all his votes. campaign was precisely to stop the recount 's. Overall, I thought that there was no legitimacy in the election what so ever. It was tampered with and rigged from the beginning.
Regardless of the motivations behind the decision, there is no doubt that it had a significant impact on the outcome of the election. Without Florida's electoral votes, Gore would have won the presidency, and the course of American history would have been dramatically different. The controversy surrounding the decision also highlighted the flaws in the American electoral system and led to calls for reform, particularly in the area of voting rights and voter
The United States Presidential election that took place in the year 2000 was between George Bush and Al Gore. The vote was very close and it ended up all coming down to Florida. Once the votes were counted and it was revealed that Bush had won, Gore wanted a recount of the votes. The matter was taken to the Florida supreme court and Gore ended up winning the case.
Hillary Clinton would have won the election based on the popular votes. From the 2016 US election results, Hilary has 574,064 votes more than Donald Trump. The Electoral College votes can be an unfair advantage due to some of the states having small numbers of electoral votes. Donald Trump conquered states, like Alaska, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming with 3 electoral votes and much more that have less than 10 electoral votes. This situation has happened 4 times in elections, such as during the year 2000, Al Gore had half a million popular votes than George W. Bush, but he lost due to electoral votes.
In the extremely close 2000 presidential election, third-party candidate Ralph Nader only won 3 percent of the popular vote; but that was enough to for Republican George W. Bush to win presidency. Also, in the 2016 election, observers suggest
The Electoral College system the founding fathers devised helps to balance out the power of the large, populous states. This system forces candidates to campaign in all states since they all carry some sway in the elections (“Understanding the Presidential Election”). However, other issues present themselves as well, like states with large independent voters that can be swayed and the issue that a candidate can lose the popular vote and win the election. The first issue is that states that are equally divided between democrats and republicans and hold a large number of electoral votes like Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania are considered swing states. (“Understanding the Presidential Election”)
Each elector must cast one vote for President and one vote for Vice President. In order to win the electoral college, and be nominated as President of the United States, the candidate must gain 270 of the 538 electoral votes. In an instance where no candidate receives the 270 votes needed, the House of Representatives
