Compare And Contrast The Election Of 2000 And Larry Schweikart

650 Words3 Pages

Larry Schweikart claims that George W. Bush was elected, not selected in the 200 election. Schweikart states that Bush did not steal votes for his own benefit. I disagree with Schweikart's argument, for numerous reasons. Al Gore and George W. Bush were tied for the win, and the tie-breaker state was Florida. Twenty-two of the states had a winning margin of ten percent over the other party. The margins of victory were so close in so many states that it would be impossible to prove who truly won. Many people influenced the outcome of the 2000 election, including the Supreme Court Justices. Gore respectfully won the popular vote, while Bush took home the glory.

The number of votes for each party in Florida were so close that recounts were demanded immediately. Many counties in the state of Florida faced mass confusion as the layout of the ballots for the election of 2000 left many voters confused and unsure of how they actually voted. Many elderly citizens didn't fully understand how the voting process worked, resulting in their ballots being marked with two or more candidates for president. These ballots were not counted in the final tally. Bush ended up with two hundred seventy-one electoral votes, while Gore ended up with two hundred sixty-six electoral votes. …show more content…

Bush had also lived in Texas. This being said, the Constitution only allowed one of the two to register as a citizen in Texas and still gain the electoral votes from the state of Texas. Cheney consequently registered in Wyoming in order not to forfeit his and Bush's electoral votes in the state of Texas. The media focused strongly on recounts in Florida because they had the most electoral votes of all of the undetermined states in the