A Comparison Of Two Views Of John Locke

373 Words2 Pages
Locke argues that every person has a right to freedom and no person has a natural right to rule over anyone. He argued this point by saying that God created each man giving them freedom and no one has been appointed to rule over others. These two ideas are the basic teachings that lead Locke to his definition of the law of nature. Locke believed no one should harm another in life, liberty, or possessions. This means that mankind is to be peaceful and as creations of God we have a duty to not harm one another, and to help our neighbors when we can do so without harming ourselves. The problem with this state of nature is that not everyone would automatically follow this moral law and many believe that they everyone has a right to everything.