A Literary Analysis On Conflict In The Brain Tragedy Of Hamlet

1802 Words8 Pages

In English 112 I wrote a variety of pieces, including a multigenre paper on handedness, a literary analysis on conflict in Hamlet, and an argumentative paper as well as a summary and response paper on higher education. I learned numerous different things from each of these papers. This letter will discuss each paper specifically, among other pieces I included in my portfolio. One of these additional works is my IB Biology Internal Assessment. I also put multiple "Helpful Handouts" in my portfolio and I am going to discuss a few of them and how I incorporated them into my writing. My multigenre paper was about handedness and in the paper I discussed how studies have shown that lefties brains function differently than righties. In the brains …show more content…

In my opinion, my literary analysis paper is the best paper I have written. I think this because my thesis statement is so solid and just about everything I discussed in my paper related back to my thesis. It is organized well and I set this up by explaining what I was going to talk about in the rest of my paper in my introduction paragraph. I planned this paper more than I have previous paper so I made sure I discussed everything I wanted to and I was able to structure it how I wanted to. However, to improve my essay I could include more analysis. A weakness of my essay is in a few of my paragraphs I did not explicitly detail some of the conflicts occurring, so it might have been hard for readers to make the connections I want them to. I can improve this in future papers by being more detailed so readers do not get confused. Furthermore, I could use more evidence and quotes from the play specifically to support my claims about the plot. The papers I wrote about higher education discussed how students can get the most out of their pricey college education and how it is on the students, the professors, and the institutions to ensure that graduates are well-prepared for their futures. I argued in my argumentative paper and my summary and response paper that students must truly use their minds and take initiative. Also, one of my points was that professors should engage all students and go the extra mile when necessary and colleges should concentrate most on undergraduate training. Overall, I believe that the discussion of higher education is actually addressing the greater matter of universities needing to focus most on doing one thing best: challenging the minds of young adults so students can get the most out of their college education. I included some of the benefits of pursuing a higher education in my essay as