Now, what if the matter you are currently involved is just like in this situation: a woman that is already an orphan, without a decent job and currently lives in the squatters area is carrying a child that is not accepted by its very own father – committed abortion just to save her child from experiencing all the hard things she had experienced, is it an immoral one? No, it’s not, right? We all know that a mother and her child both have a bond that unites them together, no matter what happens. No mother would ever desire to see her child dying in hunger, no mother would ever dreamed of hearing her own flesh and blood screaming of too much pain in front of her. And worst of all, she know that she must do something to save her child from such agony, yet, there is nothing else she could do, for she is as helpless as her child is. Would you still raise your child when you know from the very start you couldn’t give him/her a good future that every mother would want to give? Would you still let your child live just to let him/her be treated as a pest by the people that surrounds them? Would you still raise them just to experience the cruel and harsh life that waits for them? Yes, it is every child’s right to be born, to see the world, but what kind of world could you possibly give to them if you yourself doesn’t know why you are here on the first …show more content…
For example, a mother would give birth to an innocent baby, but chances are she would die and her baby would have 30% chances of surviving, or she would voluntarily abort her baby to save her life? In that certain situation, the father would have to choose between her wife’s life and his baby’s life. If he decided to save his wife’s life because there is no concrete possibility that the child would still survive, is it a bad thing to do? We all know that sometimes life isn’t fair. And in order to survive one must do decision no matter how hard it is to