More handpicked essays just for you.
Sex education in public schools
Sex education vs. abstinence education in schools
Sex education in public schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sex education in public schools
In this article Pamela Druckerman makes a point to say that kids in today’s society have questions about sex at early ages and those they deserve correct answers. Druckerman did research about different cultures and their sex education compared and contrasted to the ones we have in the U.S. She believes sex education for the appropriate
This major corporation works with educators to provide comprehensive sexual education for schools and programs along with providing affordable healthcare for women all over the nation. Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains provides educators on how to teach sex ed through a program called The Responsible Sex Education Institute. Their goal is stated as, “to empower individuals and communities to make responsible choices regarding their sexuality and sexual health by serving as a source for safe, confidential, unbiased, and accurate information about sex and sexuality. You can rely on the Responsible Sex Education Institute to provide safe, confidential, unbiased, and accurate information.” Planned Parenthood has helped provide comprehensive sexual health and education to clinics, programs, schools and parents all over the nation as well as promoting the regulation of teen sexuality.
There are many downsides to each of these teaching methods. Many would argue Abstinence-only programs do not offer knowledge that is critical to one’s sexual coming of age which is key to having a healthy life. One could also argue the Comprehensive Method does not teach moral values of sex and the connections between partners which are key to a healthy relationship. The Balanced Method does the best at dealing with the issues caused by both, but many feel it gives a confusing messages to adolescents. For example, it is like telling a kid, “Do not eat any candy after school” but then putting candy in front of their face tempting them to eat it.
Although federal funding for abstinence-plus sex education programs is available, there is a stipulation: these programs are still required to project the abstinence message (Kohler, 2008). Abstinence-plus education focuses more on a medical, scientific approach to health education. The moral, ethical, and religious aspects of sex education are not elaborated (Malone, 2011). Still, the question remains: Which sex education program is the most effective at reducing the risk of unwanted pregnancy in teens (Kohler, 2008)?
This idea of being ‘open to new ideas’, has only shown students of comparisons from each, and undermining their understandings of the scientific community. Another article establishes, “In 2004, however, Holt and two other publishers offered four new high school textbooks that lacked any information on family planning and disease prevention except through abstinence.” (Fighting Textbook Censorship) Since another action has been made, this has eliminated information of prevention of the effects of sexual relations. Both of these instances have only been made because of the school board’s religious beliefs.
Could there be loopholes in your lifestyle that are putting your health at risk in the long term? Joanna Hall explains how to steer clear of them. For many people, a healthy lifestyle equals eating a healthy diet and getting plenty of exercise. As women, however, there are a number of other things many of us do, or don't, do which can put a dent in our efforts to be the healthiest we can be.
The first reason abstinence-only sex education should be abolished in schools is because its excludes a variety of important information and distorts the information it does share. According to “Abstinence Education,” those who disapprove of abstinence-only sex education “feel that the program fails to provide enough facts for young people to make an educated decision about losing their virginity” and doesn’t teach “teens how to protect themselves against disease and unintended pregnancies, by using contraceptives, such as condoms and birth control pills.” Even if abstinence-only programs wanted to share this information, they “are required to withhold information on contraception and condom use, except for information on failure rates.” Additionally, “Abstinence-only curricula have been found to contain scientifically inaccurate information, distorting data on topics such as condom efficacy, and promote gender stereotypes.” Finally, “Abstinence-only policy violate the human rights of adolescents because they withhold
Abstinence-Only Sex-Ed Fails Nation's Youth." University Wire, 25 Feb, 2016, SIRS Issues Researcher, 10 April, 2017. http://sks.sirs.com/webapp/article?artno=384147&type=ART Stanger-Hall, Kathrin F., and David W. Hall. "Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S." PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science, 14 Oct. 2011.
Christianity runs deeply throughout the veins of America’s oldest traditions, whether Americans themselves realize it or not. Christianity can be seen in courtship and the wedding ceremony, but one of the more obscure traditions that Christianity had a say in is childbirth. It was said long ago, menstruation, pregnancy and the pain of childbirth are the punishment for Eve’s Original Sin. Modernly, this explanation is not so much as established as it was before. Now, pregnancy is looked upon as a beautiful and magical thing.
They provide talking points, such as “sexual abstinence until marriage provides numerous health benefits,” and that abstinence programs deter other high risk activities of teens like smoking and drug abuse. The authors also talk about how schools teach risk avoidance when it comes to many other subjects, such as drug use, bullying, or even nutrition. The comparison is that schools do not tell students about different types of alcohol, they teach students to avoid alcohol. The Focus on the Family group feels that sex education should also be about risk avoidance, instead of risk reduction. They even go as far as saying that risk reduction sex education is “taught at a lower standard than all other health topics.”
Imagine if sex education classes were offered in all schools in America. Teachers would not only teach about abstinence but also information on contraceptive choices. While some say that sex education is necessary for a student’s education, others argue that it is not taught correctly by schools and that it is not the schools place to teach it. Because sex education is so controversial, parents should consider multiple view points before making any decisions about whether or not to allow their child to take the class offered at the school.
We have ever been to the streets and noticed a young woman carrying a baby. It’s such a challenge that the woman is facing, the father of the baby, and probably their parents. I always think what if they got acquired an education about sexuality then maybe they would have made a better decision. In the Philippines, sex education is still a hot debate on whether it will be implemented or not.
Thesis Statement: Research has shown that comprehensive sexual education is the best way to educate and help teenagers about topics like sex, sexuality, gender and much more, unlike other biased and inaccurate methods like abstinence-only education. I. Introduction: The two major sexual education programs that are taught in public schools across the US are known as comprehensive sexual education and abstinence-only education. A. Sexual education is an important aspect of a teenagers ' development.
Some people believe that sex education and abstinence-only education will not prevent teen pregnancies, but it can in fact influence them to either refrain from sex before marriage or avoid having unprotected sex. According to a study lead by author Pamela Kohler, “About 25% of teens received abstinence-only education and about two-thirds received comprehensive sex education” (Kohler). Researchers found that teens who received sex education were 60% less likely to get pregnant or to get someone pregnant than those who did not get sex education (HealthDay News). School boards schools consider utilizing sex education and abstinence-only education in schools. It could stop teens from dropping out of school and being in welfare.
There is always a constant debate on whether sex education should be taught in schools or not. Rapid population growth is one of the most critical problems that the Philippines has been facing throughout the years, and sex education is by far seen as the best solution to address the said issue, for its goal is to raise awareness among Filipinos on how to perform safe sex in order to prevent unwanted pregnancies. On the other hand, some parents and religious organizations are not in favor of implementing sex education because they are very convinced into thinking that implementing such curriculum would not only educate the students on how to perform safe sex but would also encourage them to do premarital sex as long as it is safe. But if it’s
