Adolf Hitler Research Paper

1654 Words7 Pages

Priscilla Feroli 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
October 19, 2017 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
EUH4465 p p p p p p p p p p p p
Paper #1 i i i i u u u u u u u u u u u u

President Hindenburg designated the infamous Adolf Hitler as a legal official of Germany in 1933 without knowing the consequences would be deadly. Manipulative and deceiving, Hitler ruled an era filled with hate, horror, and history for today’s generations. Magazines and scholars such as: Thomas Grant, Nathan Stoltzfus, Benjamin C. Sax, and Time focus on Hitler’s regime, and how the evil dictator took over an entire country, regardless of how people felt. With this idea in mind, President Hindenburg foolishly elected Hitler as Chancellor, stemming …show more content…

Hindenburg yearned for total power, while Hitler worked for utter corruption. a a a a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b b b b c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c January 30, 1993 marked a historical day for Hitler. Before this date, President Hindenburg knew the candidate, Hitler, would not be the right choice for such an important job. As the Chancellor of Germany, Hitler would have the ability to make mass decisions affecting the lives of more than just his country. Hitler’s deceiving front fooled a large portion of Germany due to his many friends and vibrant personality. Nevertheless, this did not fool Hindenburg, but he allowed him as Chancellor anyway. The President decided against his initial decision to refrain from allowing Hitler to be in charge, which changed the course of history while affecting the lives of millions. Benjamin C. Sax’s book ‘Inside Hitler’s Germany’ goes in depth on the mendacious man Hitler truly was, and the power of words when stating, “Hitler …show more content…

Germany, left with practically one voting option if they wished to live, faithfully stood by Hitler’s side. Allied with not only the military and government, Hitler drew in additional back up and attention from the famous, such as, “Alfred ‘Hugenberg, a multimillionaire press and film baron often described as a rabid nationalist, seized the party's reins in 1928 and led it to a fateful alliance with Hitler” (Grant, 26). Hitler excelled in popularity and sweet talking, making the task of finding a union practically effortless. Nathan Stoltzfus’ ‘Hitler’s Compromises’ deliberates more on this topic by analyzing how the autocrat made settlements with people, leaving him to seem as though he was compromising. Stoltzfus continues to back up Grant’s support theory regarding Hitler when he discusses how the Nazi party preached for Hitler; they followed his dictatorship no questions asked, especially when it came to speaking to the Jews. “They are calling for you out there. They want you to come back- this is German Loyalty” (Stoltzfus 88). So involved in their dictator Hitler, the Nazi party not only killed, but degraded millions of Jewish people, proving their loyalty to Hitler. The man known for his way with words was also feared for them. Time Magazine’s ‘Hitler, Man of the Year’ portrays the harsh truth of people walking on eggshells when stating, “His shadow fell