Fleet Marine Force Manual 1 stated, ‘War is both timeless and ever changing. While the basic nature of war is constant, the means and methods we use evolve continuously.’ These words clearly states that war by itself is simple and very good known to humanity but the approaches what have been used is developing year by year. To understand how long could last age of war and could it end one day we should understand the sense of war and main causes, to avoid creation of fertile soil for hostilities in the future. Moreover there is different ways how to get desired result by the well-developed states avoiding to be involved in military conflict with another state. To understand this bunch of factors what encourage and creating military conflicts …show more content…
Such kind of factor makes wars old fashioned and instead of arm race countries starting to compete at global market. Even such kind of countries who seems to be previously sceptically accepted on international trading arena becoming serious players on today financial market. For example ‘then there are cases like South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Brazil in the 1960s and the 1970s or today’s China that have done very well economically under dictatorship.’ Those factors shifting regular warfare in manner where main battles are fought by economical spying, factory extension, by cheaper labour attraction, by technology development and much more. Wars are fought more in economical approach instead of bloody struggle, more over if one state will size another state that winner side will deal with sized countries internal issues as well, significantly decreasing their countries capabilities or slowing down their economic and political potential. One can ask, that why do we have military conflicts today? The answer is simple and complicated in the same time. The country with developed industry and name in international financial market will not start the war with other country but it can create preconditions for war in another country or between other countries. The reason could be to slow down their economic potential or make …show more content…
Usually such kind of sanctions targeting country’s financial system and access to global market. For example ‘…the banking, technology and defence industry sanctions have had a significant impact in weakening Russia’s economy, helping to push the country into recession…’ Of course one can argued that economic sanctions is the tool of diplomacy. It is true but from that perspective mostly problems unsolved by sanctions can easily became military issues as well, that is the reason why those tools of power are standing close to each other and interacting. Speaking about future conflicts they mostly will be solved diplomatically as in military way. In the future military conflicts will not disappear because some of states or groups will not be capable to powerfully act at global market field and provide prosperity for their followers, instead of that they will act using armed clashes as well. According to threat developed countries will act fast and precisely focusing to cause of problem instead of fighting with consequences. Mostly such kind of activities will be conducted using irregular warfare by non-state actors like terrorist groups, drug trafficking organizations and violent global activists. Conflicts will become unpredictable and fast where involved countries will deal with uncertainty and irregular