ipl-logo

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Justin Trudeaus Reform Canadian Senate

895 Words4 Pages

In efforts to better the Canadian senate Prime Minister Justin Trudeau publically stated that he plans to reform the senate. While critics of this part of parliament state that it is a system that needs to be abolished arguing that it is deepy partisan, laced in scandal with a lack of accountability and legitimacy. Justin trudeaus reforms call to make the public trustworthy of this institution; resolving some of this issues above.It is my position that the senate is a valuable institution for Canada and this will be explained through the exploration of the powers of the senate, weighing its advatanges and its disadvantages, ending with the trudeaus plans and current modification of the senate. This paper will begin will an analysis of the powers of the senate

The senate is long lived insition in Canada that functions as part of parliament notably along with …show more content…

Financial scandal laced the senate when sentors like Mike Duffy were accused of stating that their occupancy was not in Ottawa but in another part of Canada to have their expeneses paid for.Although he eventually has acquitted of all charges, this left citizen, and viewing the senate as robbing them of their tax paying money for inexcusable reasons. Another issue presented by critics is that it is not truly representative of the people as members of senate the are appointed not elected and are simply people affiliated with the prime ministers party; making him use this right to appoint senators to thank people for being commited to his party; taking away the origical intention of the party to be a check against the go’vt to being used tactifully by prime minster as an automatic check for their gov’t. Trudeau’s plans resolve these issues affording transparency in this inst’and ridding it of partisanship in ways that will be explained in the next parapraph of this

Show More
Related
562 Words | 3 Pages

Unit Four - State Hearing Question 2 The filibuster is essential to good governance in the United States. By nature, this arrangement works to protect minority rights, encourage compromise, and prevent impromptu legislation. Although indispensable, the filibuster must be reevaluated and modified to prevent impotence in the Senate.

Read More
362 Words | 2 Pages

Stephen Harper Essay Rough Draft Stephen Harper positively change Canada many ways. Harper cut GST from 7% to 5% over the course of his terms. Harbour conducted many free-trade agreements especially with the European Union Union. Launching consultations for the Canada job grant which would help ensure that Canadians are able to to obtain skills and qualities that are needed to get jobs in high demand fields. What Harpers cut taxes for many Canadians.

Read More
275 Words | 2 Pages

With many losses to secure a stronghold in the provincial Congress the Patriot cause has been at a disadvantage. The Second Session of the Provincial Congress the petition to re-open the courts passed however it is under British rule. The very first act to not be in favor or help the patriot cause. Opening the courts under British rule will make passing laws and creating a new system more difficult. Americans wanting freedom from the British rule must take even more dangerous actions by way of mobs and a large amount of sacrifice the possibility of sending our men and sons to war to enable the Patriots a victory over his Majesty’s tyrannical ways.

Read More
1949 Words | 8 Pages

The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.

Read More
1421 Words | 6 Pages

Canada is now known to be a diverse, multicultural, bilingual and inclusive nation largely as a result of his work. Pierre Elliott Trudeau also believed in an equal Canada for all, he is primarily the one to introduce rights and freedoms to the citizens of Canada. While some view Pierre Trudeau as impulsive, for enforcing the War Measures Act, Trudeau enacted this for the protection of Canadian citizens against radical extremist and his actions were more rational than impulsive for the situation that had suddenly occurred. Pierre Trudeau was one of Canada’s greatest Prime Minister’s, who’s impact fundamentally changed the course of the nation by introducing multiculturalism, for introducing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and for paradoxically upholding democracy by strong action during the October Crisis.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

The monarchy in Canada is a continuous debate among the politicians and individuals. This paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages of the monarchy in Canada. This way will enable us to take a clear position. First, Canadian politics are known for their divisive attitudes, and it is very hard to get consensus on decisions. The Queen plays the role of reference for the Canadian politicians and their decisions.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

How should Canada change the Senate to let it become better? The ideal senate is effective, elected and equal. (Cranny M, Moles G, Counter Points, 2009, P232) In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary for Senate to give a promise that they will have a high quality to do things. For example, making new laws and talking about the law which passed by the House of Common seriously and carefully.

Read More
89 Words | 1 Pages

Members of the U.S. Senate serve six-year terms, however, there is no limit to the number of terms an individual may serve. With that being said, many senators serve numerous terms, and it is rather unlikely to see an incumbent senator, a current member of the Senate, lose his/her seat after seeking reelection. This phenomenon is known as the incumbency advantage. As seen in the graph above, incumbent senators up for reelection have had an advantage since at least the mid-twentieth century.

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

However, abolishing the Senate may not be the best for Canada in the end, so another argument is to reform the Senate. The best plan at the moment to reform the Senate is the Triple E plan, as it would make it so that the Senators are elected, each province is represented equally, making the Senate more effective. If we were to abolish the Senate the only way to do so would be by a constitutional amendment backed by at least seven provinces representing 50 per cent of the population, or one with unanimous provincial

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

Institutional and historical analysis often portray the motives of governments, especially in the cases of Quebec separatism and Aboriginal mistreatment. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them. As scholars of Canadian politics, it is important to consider historical and institutional analyses when looking at any issue, as it reveals the underlying motives of actors in regards to the cleavages that comprise a state.

Read More
1686 Words | 7 Pages

After all, in giving the PM the power to prorogue we are able to hold him more accountable for his actions if the prorogue is unsuccessful, or has partisan intent. While it may be true that with great power, comes great responsibility, power is not always the best solution to the problem. In every example of Canadian partisan prorogation, prorogation is used as a last resort. Without the option to prorogue, the PM must address the situation instead of prolonging it for their personal gain.

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

All over Canada, Canadians have different views as for what should we do about the Senate .Yes, the Senate has some important qualities but what we do not need the Senate for today is one of its original purposes, to represent the interests of the provinces in the federal legislative policy process. For example, people like “Ralph Goodale, who fought hard for Saskatchewan’s interest around the Cabinet table for more than a dozen years. John Baird, the regional minister for Eastern Ontario today,”(Eugene Lang) is a current equivalent. The provincial interest is taken care of by regional ministers in a way that no senator or group of senators could hope to

Read More
1476 Words | 6 Pages

Our current laws are not strict enough on our government if loopholes such as this exist. We elect our government to rule, regulate and act in the interest of Canadians, yet Harper was able to disregard the interest of Canadians and prorogue parliament for his government’s own partisan reasons. Six years later, nothing has been done to ensure prorogation is not again used in such a partisan way. In analysis we also run into the issue that the Governor General plays an integral part in the prorogation process. The ability to end a parliamentary session is too much power for an individual that Canadians cannot keep responsible.

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

There has been many times that the Quebec separatists’ movements have fought to have the province of Quebec removed from the confederation because they feel that the constitution does not properly support Quebecers needs. The separatists’ have been fighting to “recognize the francophone population in Quebec as a ‘nation’ or ‘distinct society.’” To have this level of recognition though for Quebec in the constitution there would have to be a major amendment made or a whole reworking of the constitution. When the Constitution Act, 1982 Quebec had major problems with it because the decisions “were made without Quebec’s consent.” The lack of consent has made many Quebecers mad about the Constitution because it changed a major part of Canadian law without the consent of one of the largest provinces.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Parliamentarism, or a parliamentary government, is defined “as a system of government in which the executive, the government, is chosen by and is responsible to…the legislature.” (Gerring, Thacker and Moreno, 2005, p. 15) With this form of governmental control, many advantages and disadvantages arise, especially when this system is compared to the likes of ‘Presidential systems’ or even that of ‘Semi-presidential systems’. However, my aim within this essay is to, both, highlight to advantages of parliamentarism, and to also give my opinion as to why this system is better when compared and contrasted with the aforementioned systems. According to Hague and Harrop (2007, p. 336), there are three different branches relating to the parliamentary system. Firstly, the legislature and the executive are “originally linked”.

Read More

More about Advantages And Disadvantages Of Justin Trudeaus Reform Canadian Senate

Related Topics

Open Document