Much of what we, as counselors, base our work comes from empirical research and evidence based experience. Whether we are choosing to work from a specific theory or utilizing bits and pieces from many, neither leads us to complete competence. Even though a therapist may be following every ethical code and given theory there is always a question of was it the best for the client, and was it successful or not. There are times when it may be necessary to put aside what we have been taught and go with our “gut” feeling. We need to accept that we will not always have the answers and will make mistakes. In any given situation the direction that one therapist uses will not be the same one another therapist would use. For example, if a client was struggling with anxiety there are many approaches to treat the patient. One therapist may approach anxiety using a humanistic approach, it may be unpleasant however, it can be used in a positive manner. The therapist using CBT would address anxiety by identifying, understanding and changing the clients thinking and behavior patterns. If one was to address anxiety through a biological outlook, then medication would be issued to balance the brain chemistry. Another therapist may combine more than one theory. …show more content…
As Kottler’s story of Kyle exemplifies the progress in a client may be coming from sources outside therapy. We can not truly predict if we can help a client coming in for therapy or not. Some clients may not be totally committed to making necessary changes in their lives, and if not how can counseling benefit them. When a client chooses to discontinue therapy prematurely, the counselor may assume they have failed. That may not always be true; in the long run the client may have progressed to a state where they are emotionally healthier. It is not always possible for a therapist to determine whether or not a client has benefited from their