ipl-logo

Alexander The Great Essay: Respect And Loyalty

356 Words2 Pages

So because of this you can see why respect and loyalty as so closely linked. Because Aeneas does lead from the front, because he is out in the fight, because he does take personal risks in order to protect his men there is a strong since of loyalty between him and the men that accompany him to Italy. We can see this when Aeneas continues to fight through the hardships he faces on his journey. Not only is he fighting because of his loyalty to his men, he is also fighting because he is loyal to his father and the Gods. Again this is an attribute that most successful leaders throughout history have mastered. However, I think that one who stands out is Alexander the Great who’s known for having an extremely loyal army. This loyalty is built by the attitude he creates through his pre battle speeches. …show more content…

Above all, we are free men, and they are slaves. There are Greek troops, to be sure, in Persian service — but how different is their cause from ours! … And what, finally, of the two men in supreme command? You have Alexander, they — Darius!” Through speeches such as this one he is able to breed a brotherhood within his military, this is what creates there loyal bond. We can see this same type of leadership when we look at Aeneas, he is able to bring his soldiers together and create a brotherhood between his most elite worriers. This is the reason why they are able to stand together through the trials and tribulations of their journey to Italy, and is why being able to breed loyalty within your subordinates is so important. However, none of this respect or loyalty will ever come if you are not willing to be a servant

Show More
Related
781 Words | 4 Pages

How Great Was Alexander the Great? Alexander the Great was the son of Phillip II who was assassinated after conquering the Greeks. Alexander became king at the age of 20 and right away began to expand. He began by crushing a Greek revolt in Thebes and gained the respect from the rest of the Greeks not to rebel.

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

Once in a while leaders can get occupied, even the considerable ones, however they must understand that they committed an error and must endure the outcomes. Various leaders lead for the recognition. Odysseus from The Odyssey and Everett from O Brother Where Art Thou were both astonishing leaders and their men admired them. In spite of their likenesses there are a few things that set them apart. Despite the fact that Everett and Odysseus are similar, Everett has better initiative abilities, which at last causes him and his group get to where they have to go.

Read More
1881 Words | 8 Pages

loy·al·ty ˈloiəltē/ noun the quality of being loyal to someone or something. a strong feeling of support or allegiance. Loyalty is very strong and very meaningful, like true love or brotherhood. Loyalty has to be earned, not just given away. In The Odyssey, the epic poem by Homer, Odysseus’ crew is steadfastly loyal to him and follow nearly his every direction, even though they are given many reasons not to be.

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

However, examples within the literary narrative of the Odyssey leaves the discussion open with regards to his leadership. Thus, the question of leadership supersedes the topic of Arete. Was Odysseus the ideal leader or did he portray undesirable leadership tendencies? The examples that will presented will illustrate that Odysseus hubris, risk taking prowess, and at times unwillingness to follow instructions often placed his crew in danger as he journeyed Ithaca.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

In only 10 years, Alexander the Great created one of the largest land empires the world has ever seen. Phillip II, Alexander the Great’s father, turned Macedonia into a regional power, which structured the foundation for his son. Once Phillip II was murdered in 336 B.C., Alexander the Great gained authority over the Macedonian Empire. Alexander the Great expanded the empire to such an extreme extent that it spanned over 3,000 miles, and only at the age of twenty. In addition to broadening the Macedonian empire, Alexander the Great was also undefeated in battle, contributing to his being known as the greatest military leader.

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

The transformation of the Iatros began with Alexander the Great whose conquest through Egypt, in 322-321 BC, led to the foundation of Alexandria. As he took control of Egypt Alexander the Great continued his conquest East and left one of his Generals in charge, Ptolemy I. Eventually, Alexander the Great died which lead to a power vacuum amongst his generals, who went to war with one another. In light of these events, Ptolemy I declared himself the ruler of Egypt and sought to make Alexandria the economic and cultural capital of the Greek world. Ptolemy I, had a tremendous advantage with the wealth and papyrus of Egypt and was able to basically build Alexandria from the ground up.

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Heroes are people who are devoted to achieving greatness. Villains are people who are devoted to wickedness. Alexander the Great was a ruler in Macedonia who later went on to control the Persian empire, Greece, India, and Egypt. Alexander was the son of Philip II of Macedonia. He came to power after his father died, leaving him to be king at the young age of 20.

Read More
313 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander the Great is considered perhaps the greatest military leader of the ancient world due to his ability to craft intelligent military tactics by analyzing the opposition and developing a powerful Greek-Macedonian army. The army of Macedonia that was inherited from Philip II, thrived during Alexander 's rule because they possessed an unmatched weaponry and underwent relentless psychological and physical training in order to work as a collective unit during battle formations such as the phalanx, an infantry formation used to conquer various forces (5). The leadership demonstrated within his army was extremely indispensable because of the attitude which instilled both the confidence and ruthlessness needed to dominate their enemies. " There

Read More
192 Words | 1 Pages

In Shakespeare's Henry IV, Shakespeare elaborates the unfortunate conditions of two rulers and their quest for glory stating, “Two stars keep not their motion in one sphere; Nor can one England brook a double reign, Of Harry Percy and the Prince of Wales,” (Henry IV.,v.4.) meaning there can be only one, one ruler and one source of glory. Some refer to this style of thinking as, “black and white,” yet it is a common style of “in the box” thinking to this day. For Instance, many historians question Alexander the Great’s credibility of forming the basis of the Hellenistic World during the ancient centuries, stating Alexander should not be known as the carrier of Greek culture as notings demonstrate his attempt to imitate Persian culture and

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

Glorious men have graced the earth and have left significant impressions on the following generations. Alexander the Great suits that profile like none other. As arguably one of the most influential military leaders in history, Alexander conquered the majority of the known world, including large-scale empires such as the Persian. Succeeding his father, Philip II, to the throne at the age of 20, Alexander commanded an already skilled military, which he schooled further in the beginning of his reign. Even militarily significant empires had no chance against Alexander 's military brilliance and so he constructed one of the largest empires in history.

Read More
1251 Words | 6 Pages

As they stood side by side, facing the perils of war, they grew and matured together, as Pressfield captures, "We will not be boys tomorrow, Alexander, but men. " This sense of shared sacrifice and common experience forged a deep sense of brotherhood within the army, improving the morale and fighting spirit of Alexander's army. Through these quotes, it becomes apparent that Alexander's ability to empathize with his soldiers and fight alongside them on the frontlines played a vital role in his military success. This connection fostered a bond of loyalty, allowing his army to endure the difficulties of war and achieve feats that

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Dwight Eisenhower once said, "The supreme quality of leadership is integrity." Odysseus displayed a lack of integrity and poor leadership by not fully communicating all the facts of the situation

Read More
1343 Words | 6 Pages

Madison McDonald Dr. Travis Montgomery ENGL 2213-02 16 March 2018 Violence in The Aeneid The Aeneid is bursting with violent acts from the beginning to the end. The main character, Aeneas, constantly faces conflict from both humans and gods. Aeneas is a Trojan hero and prince who embodies pietas, driven by duty, honor, and devotion, which makes him an example of an ideal Roman citizen. Aeneas was called by the gods and determined to be a successful founder of Rome, but he faced complications along the journey. In each conflict along the way, Aeneas dealt with fighting and violence and could not find peace until the end.

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

Lastly, Odysseus illustrates good leadership through his use of determination. In the Circe episode, Circe persuades Odysseus and his men to stay with her. Homer explains how the

Read More

More about Alexander The Great Essay: Respect And Loyalty

Related Topics

Open Document