Checks And Balances Of Pluralism Is Linked To Democracy

American Constitution
Introduction
History shows that pluralism is linked to democracy which is a system characterized by checks and balances of autonomy or power. Such autonomy is the one in play in forging an agreement of the general interest that dictates administrative strategy or policy framework. On the other hand elitism notion regarding the administration states that a chosen few of the most affluent and influential people or groups direct and influence public policy that works in their favor and satisfies their own interests. Various scholarly standpoints reveal that a more contemporary notion of American administration and partisan matters incorporate the two worldviews of partisan behavior. Pluralist and elitist approaches are two

This development is more characterized by elitism than it is the case of pluralism in nature since many unfolding events or outcomes are more typical of the elite form of worldviews and actions. One of the major factors associated with this is that the associates to the constitutional convention comprised majorly of those of European decent, affluent associates of the “upper class.” This particular group of people sought a strong central administration that was meant to congeal their own power, influence, and interest in the best way they wanted it to become. Even though the convention was alleged to have been held with the view of modifying the articles of the confederation that had been guiding administration, other partakers thought otherwise. This is so because, Hamilton and Madison fought for an absolutely novel form of administration that they deemed more superior and suitable than the one that was in place those

It was clear that, such autonomy is the one in play in forging a consensus of the general interest that dictates administrative strategy or policy framework. Increasingly, it was also seen that, elitism notion regarding the administration states that a chosen few of the most affluent and influential people or groups direct and influence public policy that works in their favor and satisfies their own interests. It was notable that, since the associates to the constitutional convention comprised majorly of those of European decent, affluent associates of the “upper class,” they revealed what came to be elitism. Hence, this particular group of people sought a strong central administration that was meant to congeal their own power, influence, and interest in the best way they wanted it to become. It was also clear that, those in attendance comprised of the white, affluent, and superior men from the upper classes. Hence, this affirmed the notion that the convention was characterized as elitist as opposed to being pluralist as an event in the American