Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Books vs movies compare contrast
Ender's game book compared to movie
Ender's game book compared to movie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Books vs movies compare contrast
He makes that scene plain and tedious by altering the talking wallet with a knife. The novel is more effective than the movie because the novel is more magical and amusing than the movie, which is more simple and
The Westing Game, a very interesting book with the plot and the character setting aligned perfectly. Yet, the movie and the book, not so matched perfectly. There are many similarities, but also many differences. In my opinion, the book was much better, I think it was better thought out and described. The plot, characters, and book itself was very different and similar at the same time.
When dividing the book and movie of Enders Game into sections, we can clearly see that the movie was far more better than the book, at least visually. Not only did the movie show us greater details than the book, it also gave us an idea of what the characters and settings looked like. Some scenes that prove that the movie is richer in quality than the book; is the fight with the buggers at the beginning, the battle room scene with salamander and leopard army, and when Ender goes on the Bugger 's planet to talk to the queen. Let 's begin from the movie with the scene of the bugger 's invasion. At the beginning of the movie, we see the Formics ' (buggers) attacking Earth.
This difference weakened the movie because less of Ender’s struggles were depicted and there was less conflict to catch the viewer’s attention. These parts were left out of the movie mainly to save time. Another difference between the movie and book was the drama and conflict that followed after the Bugger World was destroyed. In the book, there is a conflict that occurs on the space station between the Russians and parts of the I.F. The conflict ended with the Locke Treaty that was proposed by Peter.
In the end I found the film to be easier to understand vs the book as it was an easier and more straight forward plot line whereas in the book it seemed to jump around leading to constant flipping between stories and pages to get a better
This seemed like a negative aspect to me because it made him look bad as a character, or could have changed how people reading this book see him
The Ender 's Game book and film are not similar. Andrew Wiggins “Ender” was chosen out of his two siblings to go to Battle School and fight off the buggers. He was chosen by Colonel Graff and Mazer Rackham to save mankind. The book was more enjoyable as a reader.
The author of the book is Orson Scott Card who wrote the book twice the second one adding in detail about what was going on back in earth with his family, the movie didn’t include that. It won the Nebula Award and the Hugo award, which are the probably the two biggest science fiction awards. There are ten novels right now in the same universe as Ender’s Game (obviously it was quite successful). In 2012, was first in “Bestselling Science Fiction Novels of 2012” from
I will admit I was weary before watching the movie since movie adaptations of books have reputation to leave out a lot of details. Why did the filmmaker choose to leave out so
I agree that the movie was better. However, I don 't agree that the novel wasn 't good. The novel would have no strikes against it if it weren 't for that thing with Hooper and Ellen Brody, in my honest opinion. I will say that I think the movie Patriot Games is much better than the novel because the movie has a much better ending and the line that comes from Jack Ryan, "I will ****ing destroy you. I will make it my mission in
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.
The movie only focuses on the story of the Andrea Gail and the men from Gloucester. I think the overall story is better off this way. For example, I think if the book was written like this, the reader would become more connected to the characters and the book. The reader would go through the same emotions and feelings as the characters because they experienced the same event simultaneously. All in all, I think the book has a great story, but lacks a proper structure for the story at hand.
The Shawshank Redemption came out in 1994 with the cast that includes Morgan Freeman and Tim Robbins. The Director and Screenwriter is Frank Darabont and the author inspiration was from Steven King. Awards given Morgan Freeman Best Actor and Frank Darabont who received the Best Adapted Screenplay award, the Studio Crystal Heart Award, and Best Foreign Language Film, and Feature Film Category, Literary Award Screenplay, USC Scripter Award Stephen King (author) Frank Darabont (screenwriter). The Shawshank Redemption has many great scenes that make it great but when Andy Dufresne escapes is when most of the movie elements and emotions come into play. Interpretation
Even though it may have stalled things that should’ve happened or that needed to happen, it added a necessary element that happens, not only in the book, but also outside in
The problem is that the majority of the people watching the movie is unaware of such story line and are going to get lost within the continuity of the movie. This is one of those times in which more is