Imagine you are living a few years after Andrew Jackson’s presidency. You find out your money held in the National Bank is not stable. Everyone goes into a panic, and you aren’t able to focus on anything else because you are worried about your money. This actually happened to many people during Andrew Jackson’s presidency. This is one of the reasons that has led people to believe his presidency shouldn’t be admired, and I agree with those who think that. Andrew Jackson’s presidency should not be admired by our current generation because he led the United States to a financial crisis and used the spoils system. The financial crisis that occured was a big effect of Andrew Jackson’s presidency.
Andrew Jackson led the United States to a financial
…show more content…
The spoils system Andrew Jackson used meant that he chose who got to work with him and be cabinet members. This wasn’t beneficial to the United States because he chose people he thought would support his needs, and didn’t choose by education and people that would word hard and contribute ideas. According to American History: Spoils System, “Appointments to office were based on the needs of the party, rather than a person's qualifications or skills to do the job… The Spoils System led abuses of political power designed to benefit and enrich the ruling party.” The spoils system only allowed the needs of Jackson’s political party to be fixed, but not any of the others. Most of the people Andrew Jackson hired were those who supported what he was doing and those who believed in the same ideas as him. The people hired started to abuse this power they were granted, and it did not benefit anyone except for themselves. The spoils system might have kicked out wealthy men that were well educated and had great ideas, and replaced them with commoners with not much education and skill in helping to run the states. By using the spoils system, it showed one way Andrew Jackson was not a strong leader to the United