Community values are an important factor as they affect styles of policing. Every community has different values which alter the way police approach preventing and addressing crime. Some neighborhoods might not want police presence as they feel as if their neighborhood might seem as if its high in criminal activity. Other communities might feel safe seeing patrol vehicles passing through routinely. There is also neighborhoods that might need more aggressive order maintenance as they have higher crime rates.
3). Time and time again, however, the introduction of community policing has only served to divert taxpayer money away from valuable institutions and toward police without changing the relationship between the police and the communities they infiltrate. By nature, adding police to a situation creates hostility — individuals in communities that have been fragmented by mass incarceration know far too well that so long as police officers are present, there is a chance they get shot or go to prison. Situations that would never have escalated in a typical situation often result in arrests and violence. As a man in Prison by Any Other Name recounts, community policing gives officers opportunities to harass people for as little as “tossing a paper plate on the floor.”
The stance that Solicitor General Frank Oberle takes in regards to the direction policing is going is a stance of optimism on community policing. He believes that the foundation of any effective policing agency is one that has community policing at the forefront (Citation). This notion of community policing being the foundation of an effective police agency is something I agree with. This is because a community that feels as though the police are apart of it rather than outside of it, is a community more likely to help the police when called upon. The other positive aspect of community policing is that it may help to reduce the us versus them mentality within the police agency itself.
In 1829 Police was seen to focus on crime prevention, deal with legal due processes, and work within local communities more collaborative to fight crime with more efficiency. According to Reith (1975) cited in “The Evolution of Policing” chapter 1, the ‘word’ policing meant management of order behaviour, laws, surveillance, arrests, fines, corporal punishment, as example arresting with use of force. More recently, authors such as Hopkins Burke (2004) defined ‘Policing’ as form of power, the act of persuasion or even assistance to community population, example of that are the cases of payback as salts, killings, forced recovery of stolen goods.
The objective of this position paper is to present both the pros and cons of community policing and to conclude with my judgment on which on which course of action should be taken. The objective is for the new community policing initiative is to strengthen and build trust and communication between civilians and officers. Many officers feel under appreciated within the communities that they work for and have struggled with trying to regain community cooperation, trust, and respect. The realization that has happened is that the philosophy of reactive incident driven approach must be changed to amore proactive problem solving style; such as a community policing initiative. Community policing is, in essence, a collaboration between the police
This helps out with public relations and will strengthen the trust in the police during dark times and times of need. Community policing can make better relations between the police and citizens of the area. We should focus on community policing because “Law enforcement agencies often suffer from image problems. At worst, the public views them as authoritarian and paramilitaristic, quick to use force, and slow to admit mistakes. At best, citizens do not really know their local law enforcement officers.
Skogan and Frydl (2004) examined the evidence on police effectiveness and found that community policing and problem-oriented policing are effective approaches to reducing crime and improving community relationships. These approaches involve a more collaborative and problem-solving approach to policing, which can help address underlying issues that contribute to crime and disorder in communities. One of the key arguments against police reform is that it may undermine law enforcement's ability to do their jobs effectively. Klockars et al.
As suggested by some experts, the most feasible solution to reduce crime and at the same time create a better police-community relationship is community policing. First of all, in order to understand more about community policing, one must recognize the true definition of such law enforcement strategy. Community policing is considered an organizational strategy in which the community and law enforcement are expected to work closely together in order to solve problems that affect everyone equally; such problems are fear of crime, physical and social disorder, and neighborhood decay. The main idea of community policing is that those people considered to be law abiding citizens should be allowed to have some kind of input in what involves the police work, in exchange for their participation and support (Jenkins, 1995). This type of interaction is encouraged by the idea that police alone cannot solve all the crimes that affect our communities.
Focusing so intently on security often does not sit well with citizens who are subjected to more invasive policing methods. Security Policing does not see every citizen and every area as the same or equal, it looks for areas with a higher risk for crime and implements higher levels of security and policing accordingly (Chriss, 2013). Law enforcement has essentially reinvented itself multiple times over the centuries but in the community policing era it had stumbled upon a system that worked, but because of the fear of terrorism and the over-zealous and legalistic attitudes of police departments it threw that system away. K. Babe. Howell writes,
It in this regard, solving crimes and/or mitigating conditions that give rise to public safety issues is viewed as a joint responsibility between the law enforcement agencies and the respective communities in which those agencies function. Traditional policing on the other hand views law enforcement and maintenance of public safety as a sole responsibility of the law enforcement communities. Put differently, traditional policing model finds no value in problem-solving through partnership with the communities concerned. It is therefore safe to say that traditional policing promotes reactive approaches to problem-solving hence encourages responses such as those witnessed after crimes have been
Which influence officer behaviors to make peace with citizens. The advantages for community policing is that both the officer and citizens get to come in accordance with reducing crime and increase the security in the community and neighborhoods. This era gave citizen a voice. To help assist and work with officers as community watch to reduce crime. Unlike the reform era, who attempted to be
The massacre of Jonestown was committed November 18, 1978, where a death toll of 918 people lied dead. The People Templed was founded in 1956, where Jim Jones was the main cooperate in the mass murder. Jim Jones was what some would call a “God” and what most would call a murder. This all started when Jones established The Peoples Temple in Indianapolis, Indiana, where people could go for sanctuary and help. He grew so vast he was soon able to move his practice to Redwood Valley California, where things would start to take a surprising turn for the better or worst?
Researchers stated that community policing is considered as a philosophy that promotes strategies that support and help solve issues that can rise community security such as crime, fear of crime, and social disorder (Community Policing Defined, n.d.). Community partnership allows both the police department and residents to work together in order to resolve problems within their neighborhood as well as build a healthy relationship with law enforcement officers. Supervisors serve as a role model in community policing because they are the risk takers on building a position to educate and influence their department with residents. Community policing can remain effective as long as law enforcement officers implement the vision, mission, and values
Citizens want to feel safe in their neighborhood and the police officers want to apprehend the suspect before more victims are identified. If the police department and the citizens in the community work together it becomes beneficial for both sides, this is called community – policing. Community – policing is an example of crime prevention it’s about bringing the citizens and the police department together to collaborate in an effort to address the concerning crime problems within the community. Some examples of community – policing are: neighborhood watch, business watch, additional officers on foot patrol, bicycle or horse patrol are just to name a
Community policing includes citizens when trying to discover the answers to the problems. It also tries to eradicate the fear that has been in the public and maintain order in society. The police attack this in a strategic method such that the relationship between the community and the police is retained. Before any matter by the community police is handled, they initially have to make certain that a camaraderie between their system and the public is built (Hofstede, 2013). This is done through team policing which officially started in 1970 after the realization that the policies of the police department could not work better unless the community was involved (Carter, Phillips, & Gayadeen, 2014).
