The police force we all know has one main focus, to protect people and the property in which they stand. Patrolling the areas in which they are assigned to, they make sure civilians follow the law and they handle any breakage of the law as well. Our police force is supposed to make us feel safe wherever we are. They have undoubtedly done a great job in doing so. However, over the past couple of years, the police force has taken a toll for the worse.
Without the support and approval of society, police officials can rarely meet the demand of their job (Argosy University,
The Conservative electoral vote strategy saw them gaining public confidence, by proclaiming to be “tough on crime”. The politicisation of law and order occurred due to the increase in crime rates and the postmodern turn in society. Ulrich Beck’s arguments associated with the postmodern society, and the concept of uncertainty and risk became ever prevalent. Campbell (2004) argues, traditional policing is withering away and replaced by contemporary policing methods to govern social relations in the ‘risk society’. Consequently, society’s preoccupation with risk and the existence of risk society has placed great attention on policing.
Police hold immense use of discretion in order to protect as well as balance rights of all individuals within the nation. Under the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) highlight powers that are given to the police in order to practice their discretionary roles upon any group in Australia.
Leuprecht explains that the current cost of policing is unsustainable, as “police budgets have increased at a rate double that of GDP...” (2). According to Leuprecht, this growth in spending is greatly associated with the changing nature of the profession, over paid salaries, and inefficiencies within the policing system.
In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee it demonstrates the loss of innocence in many different situations. As Atticus has to take over Tom Robinson’s case, Jem and Scout witness the difficulties of defending a black man after being accused of raping a white woman. As a result, Scout and Jem lose their innocence throughout this trial. Over time Scout and a Jem realize that the world isn’t just in black and white, and that there’ll be different shades of gray in between. Children lose their innocence after experiencing traumatic events that force them to become more independent.
These officers should encourage the community to be more involved in the prevention of crime. This will also help all communities, not just the big cities, feel more confident and comfortable in the system that serves them. There is currently so much tension between the police and the
The officers failed to consider the broader context and potential ramifications of their actions. It could be argued that alternatives, such as engaging with the youths, building a rapport and educating them, as well as treating them with respect and fairness, rather than escalating the situation and disparaging the character of the youths, could allow officers to not only comply with policy and legislation, but also more effectively police their community by building positive relationships, channels of communication, and reduction of future crime (Chan, Bargen, Luke and Clancey 1997). However, these alternatives require the appropriate use of discretion which the officers failed to
Skogan and Frydl (2004) examined the evidence on police effectiveness and found that community policing and problem-oriented policing are effective approaches to reducing crime and improving community relationships. These approaches involve a more collaborative and problem-solving approach to policing, which can help address underlying issues that contribute to crime and disorder in communities. One of the key arguments against police reform is that it may undermine law enforcement's ability to do their jobs effectively. Klockars et al.
Describe the mechanisms by which the British Police are held to account and explain why these are important in maintaining their operational independence. This essay will describe the mechanisms by which the British Police are held to account, and will touch upon the paradox of police governance, the balance of unwanted coercion of police, financial stewardship and police legitimacy. This essay will also divulge into a discussion on the topic; is policing political? There will be an argument for and against, and the advantages and disadvantages to both sides will be conversed to achieve an accurate conclusion. In addition this essay will start by portraying the significance of Police Accountability.
According those in favor of community policing, there are certain characteristics about this practice that make it a good crime fighting strategy; one of those is characteristics is called community partnership. Community partnership, to some experts, is one of the most effective ways to fight crime and reduce the deterioration of communities because it creates a trustful association between police and the community. The idea behind community partnership is that having a close relationship with the community allows police to access information that otherwise would be difficult to acquire (Walker & Katz, 2011). In all honesty, nowadays it is extremely difficult for the community to trust police officers. As mentioned before, with all the recent cases of police brutality and the killings of unarmed civilians the community is kind of hesitant in trusting its police; however, building a strong partnership could be tremendously beneficial, not only for the police, but for everyone in a specific community because it can help solve crimes and at the time rebuild an already deteriorated relationship.
Robert Peel was the British Home Secretary who played a major role in getting the English Parliament to pass into law an act creating a central police force in London in 1829 (Bohm & Haley, 2017). In creating the police force, Peel also proposed ‘12 Principles of Policing’ (Bohm & Haley, 2017) that are still important to police agencies in current times. Listed below are each of the principles, a brief description, and why they are still applicable. The police must be stable, efficient, and organized along military lines- this implies that a police force should be organized with a command structure similar to that of the military.
After reviewing Sir Robert Peel's nine principles of policing I believe all nine principles are still evident in modern policing. These principles of policing were created as a standard for initial modern police forces, however due to modernization of policing through technology and training, some of these standards have evolved to adapt to today’s standards of policing. Let us examine how these principles were the foundation for modern police forces, and the standards they coincide with today, beginning with Peel’s first principle. Peel’s first principle states the basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder (Dempsey & Forst, 2016).
For that reason, I believe that one way to improve police relations in local communities would be by having the police more socially active in communities, as opposed to only interacting when problems arise. This would put a face behind the actions of the police and improve their relationships with the people they
