In Ted Berg's essay "A Hot Dog Is Definitely a Sandwich," Ted Berg argues that a hot dog is, in fact, a sandwich. While some may dismiss this claim as trivial, it is worth exploring the reasons behind Berg's argument and the potential implications of accepting his view. First and foremost, Berg's argument rests on the basic definition of a sandwich, which he defines as "a food item consisting of one or more types of food (such as meat, vegetables, or fruit) placed on or between slices of bread." By this definition, a hot dog fits the criteria of a sandwich, as it consists of a sausage, which is a type of meat, placed between a single piece of bread that is sliced open on one side. Berg acknowledges that the "bread" of a hot dog is not typically sliced all the way through like the bread of a traditional sandwich, but he argues that this does not disqualify it from being considered a sandwich.Bergs argument is in fact flat, to be given the …show more content…
Berg points out that many popular "sandwiches" are made with just one piece of bread, such as open-faced sandwiches, tartines, and bruschetta. These items are widely accepted as sandwiches, despite not conforming to the traditional definition of a sandwich that requires two separate slices of bread. By the same token, Berg argues, a hot dog should also be considered a sandwich, even though it only has one piece of bread and lays vertical.What seems to be looked over is the fact that all the sandwiches Berg brings up”The BLT and the muffuletta and the cheesesteak”(Berg1). These