ipl-logo

Analysis Of Emmeline Pankhurst Freedom Or Death

1297 Words6 Pages
"FREEDOM OR DEATH" AND THE EMINENCE OF EMMELINE PANKHURST Being Principally a Study of an Excerpt from Emmeline Pankhurst 's "Freedom or Death" Speech, Delivered in Hartford on November 13, 1913 Brendan W. Clark '21 Trinity College History Department 270-01: Parliamentary Debate 20 March 2018 Emmeline Pankhurst in her "Freedom or Death" speech displays her savoir faire before an audience of both men and women on a subject with considerable ramifications for the latter, using this connection to engender a greater understanding of the principles of the suffrage movement. Indeed, it is her ability to identify with and engage in serious discourse with either gender contemporaneously, relying principally on conjectural situations of considerable disquietude, allusions to historical and continuing revolutions, and logical argumentation, which elevates Pankhurst 's speech to a position of rhetorical mastery and historical prominence. Pankhurst 's emphasis on personalizing the suffrage experience-especially towards men-makes her arguments particularly cogent, especially as she positions men in undesirable and disconcerting situations. Indeed, in presenting first the veritable democratic process whereby "the men of Hartford in sufficient numbers would turn out that legislature" were it to become obstinate and then contrasting it with a conjectural world wherein "they were governed without their consent" (3), Pankhurst relates the
Open Document