Introduction
Ronald H. Nash was a philosophy professor of Reformed Theological Seminary; he served as a professor for over 40 years, teaching and writing in the areas of worldview, apologetics, ethics, theology and history . This is a book analysis of Dr. Nash’s book, “Is Jesus is Savior”, published July 1994 where he expresses some insightful truths on inclusivism and exclusivism; this division of the analysis will consist of his writing on inclusiveness.
Analysis
Dr, Nash articulates with great details what is inclusivism, their beliefs and he gives concrete comparisons with the exclusivism and expound on two axioms (particularly and universality) and he gives his reader’s insightful view of the difference between the inclusivism and evangelism from many angles. Inclusivism, one of several approaches to understanding the relationship between religions, asserts that while one set of beliefs is true, other sets of beliefs are at least partially true.
…show more content…
He use biblical precision to presents and validates his agreement with great clarity. Dr. Nash revelatory insights to the degree how inclusivism does not fully support the truths presented in the holy scriptures. He shares a concise revelatory insight and he expresses, “Inclusivists obviously believe the salvation of unevangelized people depends on how they respond to the light they have. In ways that inclusivists find difficult to explain, the light of general revelation brings many of the unevangelized to a trust in the true God, a trust that has nothing to do with Jesus Christ, of whom they are uninformed”