Stephanie Ericsson, the author of the essay “The Ways We Lie,” is a screenwriter, advertising copywriter, and author. The essay was originally published in 1982 in the Utne Reader, which is a magazine that focuses on political, social, cultural, and environmental issues. It was reprinted in 50 Essays, which is a compilation of various essays. The textbook was published by Bedford-St. Martin’s, the same publishing company that produced The Language of Composition. The publishing company focuses primarily on humanities textbooks, which means that they are able to choose reliable and scholarly sources.
Eric Bartels analyzes the difficulties of modern-day marriage in his article, “My Problem with Her Anger,” by examining his own marital experiences. By optimistic confrontation and resolution of his family’s problems, Bartels believes that not only will he save his marriage, but he will also be rewarded for his sacrifices (63). The author claims he realized the separation between men and women during his late night chores (57). To illuminate this separation, Bartels acknowledges that his wife contributes more to childcare than he does, but asserts that he tries to reduce as much of this pressure as he can through cooking, cleaning, and shopping (58). Despite the author’s attempts, he contends that his endeavors to decrease his wife’s stress
The Real Story Behind Lies in Tangerine After reading the book Tangerine by Edward Bloor, it is evident that the most important theme in the book is lies and deceit, and that lies can break a person down over time. One piece of evidence that proves this is the fact that Eric stole jewelry and precious items almost all through the book and nothing was done about till mom finally felt sick at heart about the situation and decided to address it. This is important because it ties back to the main theme in this book lies and deceit and it showed how far the pauls family would go to give Eric another chance. Eric wasn’t the only one that had to keep a lie Antoine had a fake address for every year he was at Lake Windsor just to play football there. Eventually, Antoine
Throughout life, we sometimes don't take the time to think about what comes out of our mouth. We feel the need to tell a falsehood to make ourselves look better or feel better. After all, we don't want to accept the harsh truth of reality that is lives are not perfect. Sometimes we even forget why we're even lying at all. However, we are not alone as human begins it's in our nature to lie.
Lying has not been formally considered morally wrong or right regardless of the severity. Although it’s near impossible to go through a whole day without even stretching the truth once and decide which types of lies are okay or not. Stephanie Ericsson uses strong metaphors and personal experiences in “The Ways We Lie” to justify the use of our everyday lying. This unbiased essay will help readers decide whether it’s okay to lie on a daily basis. Ericsson starts out with saying she told the bank that her deposit was in the mail even though she hadn't written out the check (495).
In her essay, Hope Edelman specializes the focus on creating emotion, and using first hand experiences from her marriage to capture the attention of the intended audience, making them question the way their own marriage is being executed. This idea of sympathy being the path to go about capturing an audience in some form of communication, is still predominant in society. The writer is attempting to convey to that if possible, try to find similarities between Edelman’s marriage and their own. If successful, the marriage can make the changes Edelman feels are essential to being healthy. Hope Edelman’s perspective on the way marriage is meant to be, challenges traditional values of society; however, after reading this piece the audience may begin to prefer her idea of marriage.
Socio-linguist Deborah Tannen demonstrates how men and women communicate differently in her essay “Sex, Lies and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?” In her observations of communication styles, she discusses the way in which men and women communicate leads them to conflict because they have different understanding of their partners’ role. She also explains male and female communication differences not only cause ineffective conversation, but also push couples into a dilemma in their relationship; however, as men and women better understand the differences, their relationship improves. In the first part of her essay, Tannen discusses men and women do not have enough effective communication, which damages their marriage.
In addition to that when women finish each other’s sentences, men consider that as invasive, and interruptive. The author suggests that in order to mend the communication between marriages, the problem should be understood first which will allow improvement to come naturally. According to Tannen both men and women should try to understand each other and try to adapt when communicating but to also understand when they fail to adapt by acknowledging the
This is a negative standpoint because Tannen also mentioned that in marriage the greatest fear is being pushed away, this explains that if the husband doesn’t decide to prefer to share his opinion or doesn’t like to bring up the conversation then their chemistry would be greatly weakened and would ultimately lead to being pushed away. Also, “For women, talk creates intimacy” (Tannen). This means that men are frequently expected to bring up the conversation most of the time instead of not saying anything, leading to build a wall of silence between them. If the husband brings up the conversation first then their wife would feel more comfortable and would start to reflect back by going with the flow of the
Sex, Lies and Conversation There are many differences between a man and woman, communication is just one difference. Deborah Tannen, a University of California graduate, got her PhD in linguistics at Georgetown University; there she studied the communication between men and women. Tannen has published over one hundred articles and wrote over twenty books, including You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation (1990), which spent almost four years on the New York Times best seller list and was translated into twenty-nine languages. The article Sex, Lies and Conversation appeared in the Washington Post in 1990 and gives insight to how opposite sexes communicate with each other. From an early age we are programed to play and be friends with the same gender as our own.
Anyhow, is important to know that the missing piece of a relationship is communication, and understand that men and women are different. Although Tannen, in Sex, Lies, and Conversation, states that communication manners vary from men and women, causing conflict; however, Judy Brady,
Most people will not object to the fact that relationship is a “not ending” battle between men and women. The book gives a very clear idea on how to interact with the opposite gender. It will force any individual to think and weigh up his or her role in a relationship. It is a valuable tool for couples who want to develop deeper and more satisfying relationships with their
The "fireproof" movie is an excellent example of several interpersonal communications challenges takes in our day by day lives, how communication issues may become a barrier to the growth in the various relationship and how understanding communication skills bring differences in the relationship. The main characters in the movie, Caleb, and his wife Catherine both did not know how to communicate to each other correctly. Both of them were delivering messages through numerous active, passive and interactive ways to each other. Both of them were not aware of that to have intimacy in any marriage relationship requires interactions with abundant listening and understanding. They both did talking to each other a lot, but neither of them listened to each other giving respect and trying to understand what each other is trying to communicate.
The short story “The Adulterous Woman” by Albert Camus is focused on Janine and Marcel, a married couple, and their experiences traveling through Algeria on a business trip. While suffering the harsh conditions of their journey, Janine reflects on her decades of marriage and finds herself questioning her attachment to her husband. She portrays a negative image of her husband who she sees as inert and tied up with his work, having relinquished the passions and ambitions that he possessed as a youth when they met. These thoughts are interrupted when Janine notices the intense stare of a French soldier seated across from her. Initially, Janine feels scrutinized and begins to question her desirability, but this feeling vanishes and Janine welcomes
Tannen used her genderlect theory to help bridge that gap by acknowledging and achieving an understanding of the language of each gender. Conversation between men and women can be described like cross-cultural communication. This is the basis of Tannen’s You Just Don’t Understand. In an effort to bridge that communication gap between genders, she examined the differences between how and why people communicate.
