Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference By Elie Wiesel

597 Words3 Pages

A Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel in his ambivalent speech, “The Perils of Indifference” claims that indifference is dangerous. He supports his claim through his time he was in a concentration camp during World War II; In addition, Elie states that indifference is dangerous because he was almost killed by the Germans. Finally, Wiesel message was specifically toward the American President, Senators, and politician because they had the power to stop the genocide, but they didn’t. Wiesel purpose is to inform us that indifference is horrible and dangerous and in order to prove his claim he told his story about when he was in the labor camp in the book “Night.” He established an ambivalent tone for the readers to really grasp his message that indifference is dangerous by using repetition, imagery, and syntax. Overall, Wiesel message is about the inhumanity of indifference and the importance of resistance is still relevant today. …show more content…

In Darfur Sudan there is a genocide happening and the world is not reacting to it. In February 2003 The Comprehensive Peace Agreement made northern and southern Sudan have made peace with Northern and Southern Sudan and 2 group known as Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) and the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA) decide to revolt Khartoum government before the Comprehensive Peace Agreement meeting. The 2 rebels groups are targeting non-Arab Muslim sedentary tribes, including the Fur and Zaghawa people. The Rebels killed over 400,000 people and displaced over millions. Wiesel informs us that “indifferent” is making people suffer and “the human being inhuman” is nearly one of