ipl-logo

Analyzing Class Conflict In The Mexican Revolution

1498 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on the Mexican revolution

Andrew Kim 3032324166
Professor Ballenger
PE 160
April 4 2018

Analyzing ‘class conflict’ in the Mexican Revolution

“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.”(Marx, Communist Manifesto) Throughout the histories of nations, there have existed significant uprises which have shaped the modern social structure. When understanding the cause of the revolutions, it is certain that the conflict between different social classes is one of the most crucial factors to consider. Whether the ‘class conflict’ may have been derived from economic, political or socioeconomic issues, it is important to obtain the perspective that most revolutions are combinations of such issues along with ideologies.
The Mexican revolution …show more content…

President Porfirio Díaz aimed for a massive economic growth and to reform Mexico to an updated modern version. Díaz understood that in order to do so, Mexico needed to attract foreign capital to invest in their economy to make a growth spurt. He granted many benefits for American and European firms, yet restricted Mexico’s middle classes for political and economic development. As the reformation took progress, Capitalism was introduced to Mexico which was a new concept to the relying citizens. Without acknowledging much, the rich benefited from exploiting land generating even larger profits from aggressive taxation and led the working class to suffer from economic crisis. The extremely rapid capitalist economic transformation and a closed and dictatorial political system resulted in dissatisfaction among various social classes that exploded in …show more content…

The general agenda and the shape of Mexican revolution resembles any other revolutions in ways of political corruption leading to economic crisis, lack of government policies for the working class and the uprise of the provoked social classes. However, as mentioned above, the Mexican revolution is a combination of various ‘social classes’, united under one goal, for Mexico. Despite having different reasons based on their economic status, it isn’t easy to distinguish such ‘classes’ if we turn the angle into political issues. All ‘social classes’ were aware of the corruption of their government and the loss of control by foreign powers. The revolution was not only a means of overthrowing a dictatorship, furthermore it was re-establishing Mexico’s social order by themselves. Whether the uprise of various social classes had different goals or political views, it is certain that they aimed for economic and political reconstruction under democratic social reform. Thus, those are the reasons why I hesitate to define ‘social class’ only by economic status, but to combine with political views and what they stand for. The identity of ‘social classes’ were able to united under a goal of ‘a better Mexico’ and it was able to guide the Mexican revolution and established the power of

Show More
Related
1602 Words | 7 Pages

Many of these countries faced the same problems in their economic development during the turn of the 19th century. Mexico is seen to being very highly influenced by its neighbors with elites often adopting themes that are successful in other countries. These newly adopted ideas that the elites brought about to the country created a large divide within the social classes due to ignorance in wanting to modernize. The Los de Abajo’s and the Los de Arriba’s, the social classes in Mexico often clashed in what they believed was right for Mexico and found it very hard to come to terms with each other. Judas burning and violence throughout the religious holy week did not aid to bringing these two classes together either.

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Wheat consumption increased and more rural workers contributed to the market as a result. Europeans proposed that by creating a bigger market economy Mexico would become modernized like an ultimately

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

When her daughter questioned the family’s tradition she put her down and kept control over her daughter. This can be seen as an example of how those in power can use historical facts to maintain control over the people they rule and oversee. The relationship between labor and power is a vital element in understanding the Marxist theory and how it appears in the book. The De la Garza family’s power and wealth are dependent on the labor of their workers, specifically the ones who clean, cook, and take care of the family.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

As what 's defined as a revolution from the dictionary, “is a forcible overthrow of a government or social order in favor of a new system”. This occurred multiple times around the world, some included in the countries France; The French Revolution, Mexico; The Mexican revolution, China; The Chinese Revolution, Russia; The Russian Revolution, and many others around the globe. As both French and Mexican revolutions fought for independence and to convert to a modern world government, they both were concerned with inequality with the lower classmen. The French Revolution fought to end monarchy establishment, while the Mexican Revolution fought to end dictatorship and to establish a constitutional republic.

Read More
374 Words | 2 Pages

The Mexican Revolution of 1910 and the Russian Revolution of 1917 both had similar goals, to give power to the working class. However, they had very different outcomes, one oppressive, and one victorious. The goals of the Russian Revolution was to remove power from the aristocracy. Russia had suffered under centuries of oppression.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Historians often divide the Mexican Revolution into three main periods of fighting due to its length and complexity. Of the three periods, the one that had the most impact on Mexican society at the time was the first phase in which Francisco Madero overthrew Porfirio Diaz as new revolutionary leaders such as Emiliano Zapata and Pancho Villa arose. This period allowed people that were not usually involved in politics to become more involved. The phase of the revolution that had the most potential to create change in Mexican society later was the third one that saw Conventionalists take on Constitutionalists for control of the country. This stage created the Constitution and led to a single political party gaining control of México.

Read More
202 Words | 1 Pages

The two Latin American countries that suffered severe political, economic, and social repercussions after the revolution was Mexico and Cuba. The Mexican revolution was defying authority and protesting the dictatorship of Porfirio Diaz due to the great injustices faced upon his rule over the country. On the other hand Cuba was dealing with Fulgencio Batista who was oppressing the country and committed many atrocities toward his people, although Fidel Castro was planning his downfall to seize power during the upcoming elections. Both countries had corrupt and tyrannical leaders that prevented the progression of the nation and failed to give the people a better lifestyle. The cause of a revolution for both countries impacted

Read More
618 Words | 3 Pages

The American, Mexican, and French revolutions were similar and different in their own ways. There was a common cause, goal, and effect of each of these three revolutions in addition to the unique causes, goals, and effects. All of these revolutions were caused by political instability, had the common goal of political reformation that was met through revolutionary events, that resulted in the formation and adoption of a new constitution and form of government. There were many causes that led up to these three revolutions, some are shared by all three, some only by two, and some are unique causes. All three of these revolutions were caused by political instability in the country these revolutions took place in.

Read More
1279 Words | 6 Pages

A few years ago, a professor named Tim Banning wrote a small book in Cambridge: the French Revolution: class war or cultural conflict? (Columbia University, 2016)In this paper, the author briefly introduces the research process of this problem in the past decades, that is, the decline of social history and economic determinism, and the rise of cultural history.

Read More
1760 Words | 8 Pages

In recent times there has been an ever-growing proliferation of economically marginalized groups who by dividing themselves along cultural and racial lines have inadvertently undermined the potential for proper class consciousness to be cultivated. At a time when bourgeois capitalist exploitation of the working-class is as rampant as ever, it seems that the modern proletariat has all but abandoned Marx’s ideas of achieving proper class consciousness in favor of pursuing an ideology or acting politically in a manner more aligned with reinforcing separate cultural or racial interests. But how can we address common working class concerns across the board without taking into consideration other types of social stratification? What exactly does the concept of class consciousness mean in the 21st century and what is it about the culture of capitalism that seeks to prohibit the economically oppressed masses from developing such consciousness? Marx tells us in The Communist Manifesto that “The proletarian movement is the self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority in the

Read More
1458 Words | 6 Pages

All of these aspects of the living conditions faced by the working-class further strengthens the class divide. Fernando Garrido’s views on communism in Spain clarifies how these divulging lifestyles resulted from the Industrial Revolution: “What is said...about property: however sacred this right may be, when only a small number of privileged people can use it - and generally to the detriment of the greatest number who own nothing - is it not normal for the greatest number to view it as an enemy of their

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

The revolution, despite taking place in Mexico, caused

Read More
1471 Words | 6 Pages

Introduction Karl Marx (1818 - 1883) and Max Weber (1864 - 1920) are recognized as two of the most prominent theorists of the 19th century, they have distinctive perspectives upon social class in contemporary societies. In Karl Marx 's point of view, social class has a two-class framework though Max Weber argued that social class has three dimensions of stratification: class, status and gathering. In this paper, I will clarify and dissect why Weber did this hypothesis that these three dimensions are particular substances and can 't be settled under the single concept of class Marx and class A "class" is any group of persons occupying the same class status. Unlike like Marx 's two-class framework, Weber divided "class" into four

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Marx and Engel focused on class conflict as the driving force for their argument. Throughout history, there is a common theme of a caste society lasting for so long until the mistreated lower class attempt to break the cycle; but that system is only replaced with a new

Read More
1486 Words | 6 Pages

Class conflict, Marx believed, was what encouraged the evolution of society. To quote Marx himself, The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one

Read More

More about Analyzing Class Conflict In The Mexican Revolution

Related Topics

Open Document