ipl-logo

Analyzing Collins Arguments Against The Death Penalty

792 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays about the debate over capital punishment

thing as murder. The definition of murder is deliberate and illegal killing of a person or to commit the crime of killing them deliberately according to the Collins. Capital punishment, however, is not illegal killing, nor crime. There is a stern reason to sentence death penalty, which is to protect the society from any more harm from the criminal, and many other reasons. Such reasons were deeply and continuously revised, and it cannot be classified as a murder. Many murders could be justified, especially when the victim is the evil side. Nobody would condemn the brave British Royal navy for fighting the evil Nazis and killing the soldiers under the flag of Eiserne Kreuz Hakenkreuz. In similar way, the government should not be condemned for …show more content…

All religion has their philosophy and their way of looking at things. There is nothing wrong of believing the religion and its teachings against the capital punishment. However, unless the whole state is religious, religious groups cannot force the legislative groups or the public to accept their view when the constitution clearly quotes that the religion and the politics should be separated. Of course, the religious group can be a big majority and might have the power of democracy to change the laws suiting to the teachings, but for the people who don’t believe the religion, showing them the view of their religious belief as an evidence for standing against the capital punishment is not a very persuasive way to disagree to the capital …show more content…

Also, there is no better way apart from capital punishment to clearly show the public that the government and the legislative system is clearly standing at the public people’s side, and they are fully dedicated to protect its citizen, or at least that is how the public perceives it. The government can inherent the value of human life by punishing the criminals who took the life of an innocent people away. By capital punishment, the government can clearly express that they are always standing at the victims’

Show More
Related
698 Words | 3 Pages

At the point when managing Capital Punishment there are a wide range of strategies they use in the detainment facilities. Presently the act of the death penalty is as old as the administration itself. The death penalty is a legitimate infusion of capital punishment in which it is utilized for lawbreakers. As I would like to think, the demise of the criminal I think it rely on upon the individual whom did the wrongdoing and in addition the casualty family whom ought to have the capacity to see the crooks passing not the entire world. In the wake of perusing and doing research on the death penalty it has its genius and cons which will be clarify later.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

This paper will serve to show that capital punishment is not, in fact, ethically permissible. I will argue this by explaining the government’s duty to its people, and how capital punishment is indeed a violation of these prima facie duties. 1. The government has a duty to protect its people from harm (including murder, abuse of power, etc.). 2.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

The capital punishment is well supported in this article. It clearly shows how ethos, pathos and logos support the why the capital punishment should be kept and not taken away. The reader is heavily given enough information to go towards the side of keeping the capital punishment. While there is little information why the punishment shouldn’t be used its not supported as well.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible.

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

Killing a Delinquent Joe Atkins, who lived with his father, was said to be angry with his next-door neighbors for an unknown reason. In October 27,1985, Atkins got drunk and broke into his neighbor’s house in the middle of the night carrying with him a machete, a sawed off shotgun, and a revolver. He went into the 13-year-old girl’s room and with the shotgun, he shot her while she was in bed asleep. As if that wasn’t enough, he then chased the mother back of the girl to the Atkins house, where he shot his 75-year-old father, who had convinced the parole officials to release Atkins from prison 5 years before. Atkins had been in jail and had served 10 years of a life sentence for killing his older brother who at the time was at the age of 23.

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

This article discusses individual cases and crimes and gives analysis of the arguments made against death penalty in real world. Firstly it discusses the deterrence argument while going through a number of cases. The conclusion is that it has no effect on reducing homicides but ironically it breeds violence as in some cases offenders committed a capital crime in a territory where execution still prevails while they could have easily avoided it. Second thing discussed is the cost, the research in article shows that it costs significantly more money to put a convict to death than to incarcerate him for life in a prison. Moreover it is shown that in many cases criminals are executed while there are reasonable doubts in their convictions and some have avoided execution by just a few hours before being exonerated.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand, the coercive system is a tool that the governments use to eradicate the violence. But another way to prevent the crimens is a stronger law that includes death penalty. The biggest questions may be, what is the meaning of death penalty? and in what kind of crimes this law should be applied? Although some people think that the prison is a strong punishment, criminals continue committed crimes,for that reason, the only solution to reduce the murders and

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

People cannot just "get away" with certain crimes. If a person kills another human-being, that person should not be able to live. According to Prison Policy initiative, in the United States, there are more than 169,000 inmates in prison that have killed/murdered. In the United States around 15 children and teens are being killed each day. These families do not deserve to be in pain and shouldn 't have to go through something like that.

Read More
1274 Words | 6 Pages

If you are for or against the death penalty, the question is Do you believe a human being should be killed for one’s actions? Who deserves the Death Penalty? Many people will argue about this topic but in fact based on the law the people who get sent to the death penalty are cold blooded murders. The citizens that are in favor of this believe in the code of hammurabi which is “an eye for an eye”.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

The Death Penalty is such a touchy issue. It is a practice the government uses that puts a prisoner to death for the crimes they committed. It’s the biggest punishment and the last resort for really bad people. It’s also known as “Capital punishment”. It is a sentence for those who commit capital offences or capital crimes.

Read More
1323 Words | 6 Pages

The death penalty is the act of punishing a criminal to death who has committed a crime such as first-degree murder, espionage, or treason. This process can also be called capital punishment. The death penalty law started to become a controversial topic in the early 20th century after World War 1. Opponents of the death penalty argue the inhumane, unconstitutional, and wrongly accused aspects of the death penalty. Proponents argue the financial savings, deterrent effects, and retribution aspects of the death penalty.

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

To be honest, my winter holiday was flat. I had to look after my brother every single day. Of course, there was one thing that impressed me. On Feb. 19, I took part in a wedding, as a bridesmaid. This was my first time to be the bridesmaid which made me so excited.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Why death penalty must end ‘’An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind,’’ said Mahatma Gandhi. The execution of someone who has possibly done a crime is an inhuman act. Death penalty is hypocritical and flawed. If killing is wrong, why do we kill when a criminal has done the crime of killing someone? In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money.

Read More
1383 Words | 6 Pages

Capital Punishment is the death penalty for those who commit murder. The thought behind this punishment is a life for a life. There has been debate on if the death penalty is right or wrong. Some poeple want the death penalty to be illegal while others argue it is needed to deter crime. There are many valid arguments regarding the death penalty.

Read More

More about Analyzing Collins Arguments Against The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document