More handpicked essays just for you.
The Role of Forensic Sciences in Criminal and civil cases
The Role of Forensic Sciences in Criminal and civil cases
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Uses of Forensic Anthropology To understand the many uses of forensic anthropology, one must first know what it means. Forensic anthropology is defined as the examination of human remains (for law enforcement agencies) to determine the various unknown aspects of a murder. Forensic anthropology is a very important tool in the hands of an investigator. It can be used to determine many previously unknown factors in an investigation. Forensic anthropology is used every day and has many different purposes.
A man guilty for a crime that he did not plan, nor take into action. Tried twice with a death penalty, and a life sentence. Exonerated by DNA, after eight years in jail. Kirk Bloodsworth was an unfortunate man, but now he’s free, and spends his time how he wants. It should have been it’s own crime to convict an innocent man of a crime he did not commit.
Forensic science needs to be very careful when handling the evidence and interpreting what it means. The evidence can help find the culprit or victim’s DNA or fingerprints, these evidence can identify both the culprit and the victim so that we can solve the crime easier because we already know the people and just need to find the
There is powerful verification that fingerprints aren’t foolproof. In “ Forensic Science: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, she gives a strong explanation of how forensic science plays a vital role in solving criminal cases. Campbell has shown that forensic evidence is unquestionably the most dominant type of evidence to present at a trial. In the same way, “...unless the criminals take something away from the crime scene, hard evidence does not leave.
This information is critical for establishing the weapon's characteristics and linking it to a specific individual or incident. If a firearm is recovered from a suspect, forensic examination can determine if it matches ballistic evidence collected from the crime scene. This linking of the firearm to the crime can provide crucial evidence against the suspect. The reliability and validity of forensic firearm examinations are pivotal and essential aspects that directly impact the integrity of legal proceedings. Without in depth, scientific reliability and validity measures, the forensic evidence presented in court could potentially mislead judges and jurors, leading to unjust verdicts.
The evidence is Physical Individual Evidence and Biological Individual Evidence. The evidence is individual because the note left at the crime scene matches the paper at the suspect's home. The evidence is physical, because a physical note was found at the crime scene. The evidence is also biological, because a hand writing analysis can be done between the note and other writings from the suspect. Another example of the evidence being biological is that fingerprints can be taken from the note and tested against the suspect's.
The investigation will continue and other suspects may be considered.
Forensics has been utilized to solve criminal cases for a very long time. One of the components to forensic science is trace evidence. Trace evidence is evidence that is left behind or transferred through contact. Examples of trace evidence would include soil, hair, fibers, pollen, and gunshot residue. One might believe that it would be great to find these pieces of evidence on a victim of a homicide.
In the article “ The CSI Effect: TV Crime Dramas’ Impact on Real Life Cases” by Madeline Anderson states “ People who regularly view such shows can come away with specific ideas about the reliability and integrity of forensic evidence.” This represents that these shows give the wrong impression to the viewers on forensic evidence. Anderson as well says “ These ideas may lead jurors to except to see more forensic evidence in trials or to weigh such evidence more heavily than they would otherwise.” This shows that everything in the TV shows related the crime dramas, evidence wise there is a limit for how much the evidence can do in the actually case or in the court. Anderson states that “ It can also create false sense of confidence when it comes to understanding such evidence..”
By examining the crime scene, they are able to create a hypothesis of what crime had been committed or how it could have occurred. Having an educated guess helps investigators when they have
It is also greatly used to determine information of the previous incidents. The confused relationship that is shared between the scientific method and the forensic science method will create incorrect endings. With prior knowledge of the confusion of the methods of forensic science method and the scientific method, it seems to be almost redundant to
Eyewitness testimonies has contributed tremendously towards law enforcement and crime, helping to place the accused behind bars for the crimes they have committed. Although it has helped to place a huge number of these accused behind bars, eyewitness testimony has been proven to be rather inaccurate and unreliable (Brigham, Maass, Snyder, & Spaulding, 1982). Through the advancement of technology, DNA evidence has proven that some of these individuals have been wrongfully incarcerated. DNA evidence may be an effective measure, but it would only help to solve a minimal number of cases when DNA samples present. At times, DNA evidence might only help to prove that the individual is present at the crime scene.
The former being defined as the evidence collected in order to convict or rule out suspects, and the latter being defined as the way the investigators developed the investigation and how it evolved throughout the ensuing years. In order to evaluate these two different subjects, one needs to examine the similarities and differences between this investigation and theories about how investigation of this type develop, the nuances of this investigation not able to be explained by theory, investigatory elements that
CHAPTER IV Admissible evidence in civil proceedings Any evidence, to be admissible, must be relevant. The rules on evidence contained primarily within Parts 32 and 33 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 give the court power to control the evidence brought before it. For example, the court may decide, prior to trial, that a particular issue between the parties is no longer important and can therefore make an order excluding any evidence that the parties intended to use in relation to that particular issue.
Questioned Document Have you ever wondered how a document corresponds to a crime scene? Well it may be much more important than one must think. Questioned documents evidence has been around for ages, and is still used in understanding what occurred at a crime scene. However, the evidence must be properly cared for a preserved. A questioned document is defined as a document that is partly or entirely suspicious in regard to the authenticity or origin (James, Nordby, Bell).
