ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson Sectionalism Essay

689 Words3 Pages

Andrew Jackson had a great reputation before he was president as he was known to be the people’s person and a Great War hero. Additionally, he was from the South, and won the elections by a landslide due to common people voting for him. Sectionalism is the idea of an exaggerated devotion of the interests of a region over those of a country as a whole. Jackson's presidency encouraged sectionalism due to the party’s position on opposing the bank war and also their view on the nullification crisis. Jackson's presidency encouraged sectionalism because of him opposing the bank war. His sectionalist mindset favored the South as he was from there as he made his political agendas in a way so it favors the South. Andrew Jackson opposed the bank as …show more content…

The South opposed this, as this gave more power to the federalists, and were scared that the government was going to interfere with slavery, and that would gravely hurt their economy. Furthermore, Jackson argued that the bank supported the wealthy class and they only benefited from this, while the lower economic class wasn't favored at all. However, the North believed that the national bank should be open as that helps the economy of the United States. This is because the Bank would be able to give the government a short term loan to ensure financial stability and promote the economy by additional credit being deployed by the national bank. Jackson barely considered this idea in his mind and vetoed Clay’s bill to recharter the bank, as he believed in sectionalist ideologies and due to this he created pet banks. This was when Jackson stopped depositing federal funds in the National bank instead the money flowed through selected state banks issued for their officers loyalty. This led to the …show more content…

This issue created even more divide between the North and South, and the government at the time favored the South. This all started by congress passing a new tariff that doubled the rates in 1816. In response, Southerners were mad as this negatively impacted their economy while the North was positively impacted by their industries. This made the southerners' agriculture more expensive due to them depending on British imports. Andrew Jackson's Vice president, John C. Calhoun argued that states had the right to nullify any act of congress that was considered to be unconstitutional, as he wanted to boost the Southern economy, and get rid of congress’s tarif. Henry Clay(person on opposing side) allowed little to no compromise, as a result Clahaoun resigned as Vice president to side with his home country. As expected, Jackson's political interests also aligned with the Southerners, and the plantation workers in the South. He forced and convinced Clay to give them a better compromise. To calm tensions down with the President, Clay passed another tariff in 1833 that lowered rates over a 10 year period. Although the president got his way, and the situation subsided, there was still regional and sectional tension that worsened in the United

Show More
Related
198 Words | 1 Pages

War on national banks/economic decision: Jackson did not like the bank he said that the bank was unconstitutional Jackson hate on bank became a big issue in the presidential campaign of 1832 Henry Clay said that Andrew Jackson wanted to much power as the president When Andrew Jackson became president again he thought that that meant that the public approved his opinion on destroying the national bank on Andrew Jackson second term his goal was to destroy the bank before its charter ended in 1836 eventually the bank went out of business Jackson won the war but the economy was the victim. Andrew Jackson ended up getting rid of the National Bank and with the money that was in the bank he took it out and gave the money to a lot of smaller banks

Read More
257 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson hated the national bank. The national bank had too much power, he had people spy on the bank and Jackson found out that when they gamble and lose they charge the bank. But when they win the all split it in evenly between them. So he said by the

Read More
135 Words | 1 Pages

Jackson and the Democratic Party believed in limiting the influence of the federal government, with more power lying with the states. While in office, Jackson used his executive power to veto laws more times than any other president before him. One of these veto choices involved allowing the Second National Bank charter to expire. Jackson believed that the national bank only helped the wealthy, not the common people in America. He removed all the money from the national bank, transferred it to the states, and let the charter expire.

Read More
1447 Words | 6 Pages

Andrew Jackson hated the National Bank just like Thomas Jefferson however he took it to a whole other level. Jackson - “He believed that an economy built on credit was inherently unstable and a person who made his money through speculation rather than the production of something real—like a crop or a manufactured good—was less independent and less virtuous. He believed that an economy that rested on the circulation of paper—inflated bank notes, stock certificates, and bonds —was unstable and morally suspicious.” Jackson’s opposal and killing of the National Bank caused an economic depression within the States. The Panic of 189 - “Banks throughout the country were unable to make good on customers' claims for specie and were forced to close their doors.

Read More
274 Words | 2 Pages

From what I read and what he said, I thought it sounded like he didn’t want to shut down the United States Bank. And then in Document 5, Webster acted like Jackson should put an end to the bank by saying, “It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich, it wantonly attacks whole classes of the people, for the purposes of turning against them the prejudices and resentment of the other classes.”

Read More
399 Words | 2 Pages

While the Bank of the United States created under Hamilton’s Federalist economic policy favored the wealthy New England elite, Andrew Jackson’s refusal to recharter the BUS in 1832 was not only personal in nature, but harmed the populace he claimed he was helping and representing, which resulted in economic downfall. Jackson was a strict constitutionalist who had a past with banks. Like many western Americans, he fell prey to land speculation and blamed banks for his economic woes and near imprisonment. He did not see the value in having a national bank due to his suspicion of its policies. His prejudice against the Bank led him to ignore the benefits the economy reaped as a result of the federal regulation of currency and credit.

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

President Jackson spent a lot of his two terms attempting to devastate the National Bank, which had been sanctioned by Congress in 1816 as a national place for a monetary arrangement. Jackson felt that the bank was uncalled for imposing the business model and that it mishandled or may manhandle its critical power. Jackson put it all on the line to crush the bank, a campaign that just about expense him the administration in 1834 and earned him an official reprimand by the Senate. Regardless, by 1837, he had ended the bank by withdrawing federal deposits from it. For the duration of his life, Jackson was scrutinized for his unfaltering conclusions and despotic way, yet he in any case substantiated himself a sharp and mindful lawmaker.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

In 1833, Henry Clay's compromise bill with me slowly lowered tariffs over the next decade, this bill was eventually accepted by South Carolina and ended the nullification crisis. For that, I appreciate how Henry Clay is trying his hardest to keep the union together without affecting any side. Sure you're going to say Calhoun brought out the doctrine of nullification just because he is in need of votes, and Calhoun is also supporting the tariffs while saying that the South have the right to succeed. True that I want to be president true that I support the tariffs and don’t everything happens with a reason.

Read More
1424 Words | 6 Pages

In vetoing the bank bill, Jackson was protecting democracy since he could see that the bank was only controlled by the rich and wealthy, who are just a small portion of

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

The Federal Government deposited all it’s money in the Bank of the United States. Once Jackson was reelected in office he ordered the Secretary of the Treasurer to put the federal government’s money into state’s banks that are also called pet banks. Once the federal funds were gone and the Bank’s charter ran out the Bank went out of business. Just because Jackson didn’t like the bank he purposely destroyed it. The House of Representatives voted that the federal government’s money should stay in the Bank of the United States but Jackson did not care and ordered that the fund be placed into state banks (Jackson’s Economic Issues).

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Regarding the sectionalism policies, Andrew Jackson was one notable president who has made an impact on sectionalism. For instance, the First Seminole War was originated in 1817, and this war was originated because Native Americans and American services faced a quarrel as they attempted to evoke African American slaves residing between Seminole groups. Throughout this particular war, Jackson obtained the authority in opposition to the Seminoles. Throughout the duration of this campaign, Jackson apprehended Alexander Arbuthnot and Robert Ambrister. Both Arbuthnot and Ambrister were British and they worsened this issue through delivering weapons for the Seminoles, and they also advocated the Seminoles to battle with Americans for their property

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

Jackson also ordered the federal government's deposits removed from the Bank of the United States and placed in state or "Pet" banks. The people agreed with Jackson and he was elected into another term. Biddle then retaliated by making it more difficult for businesses and others to get the money they needed. This caused economic problems at the end of 1833 and into

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

With Andrew Jackson's presidency, he handled crises well and always sought victory, and that was his mindset. To give an idea, when Andrew Jackson was the president, he thought the United States National Bank was bad because it held all the gold and silver so they had the most money. But Jackson wanted to kill the bank and move all the gold and silver to state banks. He also believed the bank was

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson and his thoughts on the National bank were not very good. Andrew Jackson thought the bank held to much economic power. The national bank held all the governments silver and gold. Also the bank could print money whenever the workers wanted to when people asked for loans to buy land. Therefor on Andrew Jackson 2nd term he vetoed a bill to Increase the years of the bank.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson is an oppressing dictator that has no respect for other races and religions. He does not care what other branches of government says, he does whatever he wants. Also, Jackson does not care if taxes and tariffs are unconstitutional, he justs wants them to be paid. Furthermore, he takes jobs away from people who deserve them to give them to his friends. Although Jackson has proven to be resourceful in the past by using his kitchen cabinet, he has still made more bad decisions to outweigh his good decisions.

Read More

More about Andrew Jackson Sectionalism Essay

Open Document