ipl-logo

Andrew Ure: The Industrial Revolution

1018 Words5 Pages

The Industrial Revolution resulted in many huge changes in society, including a growth in capitalism. The social and political effects have produced a great amount of debate. Andrew Ure, Karl Marx, and Adam Smith all had differing views on industrial capitalism and opinions about what its social consequences would be. Ure’s “The Philosophy of Manufactures,” Marx’s “The Communist Manifesto,” and Smith’s “Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” all portray their perspectives. In Andrew Ure’s “The Philosophy of Manufactures,” he shows his support for the Industrial Revolution. Ure believed that all of the improvements in technology made workers’ lives easier. The new technology allows workers to produce more products in less amount of time, which would equal greater productivity, which would then equal more wealth for companies and for the country. Ure makes an argument that the people who work in factories have better lives than those who live and work on farms, because of the advanced technology that factory workers have access to. Ure also presents the argument that factory workers are not necessarily treated unfairly just because they do not receive breaks while at work. His argument is …show more content…

He believes that the wealth of the nation is increased by the increase of production, the increase of trade, improvement of technology, and expansion of the nation’s market. He believes that all of these things can be the result of division of labor between different classes. I think that Adam Smith would agree more with Ure because these ideas align with the support of industrial capitalism, which is what Ure believed in as well. Even though Smith and Ure may not agree with industrial capitalism for the same reasons, they were both still supporters of it, whereas Marx was not as much of a

Show More
Related
1282 Words | 6 Pages

The industrial revolution brought many great inventions and innovations into the world, especially to America, the new world. The United States had many resources available and more importantly for Americans could utilize them for the nations gain. Many businessmen took advantage of this opportunity by building up their businesses and wealth to a standard that many people still look to as a standard of greatness. Many historians have their take on how the men of the industrial revolution changed not only America, but the rest of the world as well. Authors, Charles Morris, Matthew Josephson, and James Nuechterlein point out to historians that the world is full of many different angles and ideas that one can view regarding the Robber Barons or the successful men of the industrial revolution.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

The growth of the nation has been stunted by the segregation of the business class and the working class. The capitalists claimed their effort to mechanize the manufacturers will provide an advantage to the working class. “Their tasks has become less onerous, the machine doing nearly everything which requires great strength” (Doc F). On the contrary, the workmen felt the continuous movement of the machines was “degrading man

Read More
1402 Words | 6 Pages

The Industrial Revolution, lasting from the late 1700s until the early 1900s, was possibly one of the greatest time periods in this world’s history. This time period caused people to think more and dream bigger. From these big dreams rose up inventors, entrepreneurs, and business owners. The Industrial Revolution brought many new inventions and production processes, but along with great new things come great terrible horrors. While some might argue that Industrialization had primarily positive consequences for society because of the new production methods and what they produced, it was actually a negative thing for society.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

He suggested that if Adam Smith were to extend his writings, he should include that this form of labor is not only used by small manufacturers of little value. It is also the basis of our world’s way of trade. The system of world trade is not only an example of how the division of labor is used on an international scale, but it is also makes the work of that small factory possible. Going back the discussion of the pin manufacturer, there is a long line of work involved in the creation of a pin even before the materials are brought to the factory. Miners dug up the ore for the pins, workers built the ships that the ore was transported on, and so on.

Read More
1509 Words | 7 Pages

Wheelan and Co.’s preface expresses how many people, even large companies, were impressed by the positive progress of the Industrial Revolution in Manchester City. Finally, after several years of mass production, the industrialization was again improved by the Factory Acts of 1844. In 1868, when Document 10 was written, the author, William Alexander Abram, states the vast improvements that have occurred on working conditions, wages, and public health. The purpose of this document is to prove to the doubtful people that the Industrial Revolution, after all, had many positive results and proved to be important progress for Great Britain as a whole.

Read More
158 Words | 1 Pages

Andrew Ure was big proponents of the factory system because he thought the conditions of laboring in factories was better and safer then work in agriculture or mining. In his praise of the Factory System he talks about how he had seen people of every age and gender barely working and able to feed themselves in the previous forms of labor. He believes that the Factory System protects its workers from the weather and offers those good wages and food. John Ruskin was a massive critic of the Factory System and the conditions that workers had to suffer. Ruskin says that if you take the work from man then they lose pleasure in the work and only care about money and profit.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

The mechanical upheaval and its consequences for individuals changes. We discovered that modern generation expanded massively, conveying riches and influence to Great Britain all through the nineteenth century. Yet, we presently can't seem to investigate the impacts of industrialization on society, on the day by day living and the working states of everyday citizens. Did the new production line life improve the parts of relatives, including ladies and youngsters? Were individuals more beneficial?

Read More
2193 Words | 9 Pages

The industrial revolution was a time of immense progress. It marked an era of technological advancements and a changing society, yet also a period smeared with unfair and unsafe working conditions. The history is filled with stories of people suffering, being injured, and even dying, all in the process of creating goods for the changing consumer culture. Thousands looked past the suffering, condoled themselves with the goods they purchased at economical prices all at the expense of the working class, a class that had no other choice than to work in the dark, dangerous factories to feed their family. While the consumer culture in this time could look past the anguish of those in the working class, progressives could not.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

The economic views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx Microeconomics Eduardo De Oliveira Superti   Table of Contents: Abstract 3 Introduction 4 The economic views of Adam Smith 5 The economic views of Karl Marx 6 Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx 7 Examples in the world of today 9 Conclusion 10 Recommendations 11 Bibliography 12 Introduction Adam Smith and Karl Marx were completely contrasting economists throughout their time and had an enormous effect on the world and the way we view economics. They represent the ideas of capitalism and socialism.

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

Industrial capitalism refers to the social and economic system in which trade, industry, and capital are privately controlled and operated for profit. In the late 1800s and early 1900s, many crazy events were happening in response to industrial capitalism that changed our nation and many of the ones surrounding us. The United States pushed for the strenuous life movement which hoped to bring masculinity back to America by making stronger men who were athletic and could fight in the war. Women were becoming professionals and taking on better careers such as teaching, nursing, and social work which made people worry that women were coming to more power. In the Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, they attempted to explain

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment

Read More
1199 Words | 5 Pages

Adam Smith, an advocate of capitalism, in his book, The Wealth of Nations wrote that all individuals are selfish and by performing to the best of their capabilities towards their own selfish interests they contribute towards the nation’s collective growth. Karl Marx, on the other hand criticized capitalism and believed that socialism and communism are society’s best chance of maximizing individual happiness, about which he wrote in his book Das Kapital. In this paper, we will compare and contrast the economics theories of Adam Smith and Karl Marx on the lines of labor theory of value, division of labor, alienation of workers from labor and human happiness and surplus profit and its social implications. This paper will also discuss how… Adam Smith believes that there are two types of ‘values’ of a commodity – ‘utility value’ and ‘exchange value’. The utility value of a commodity is based on how useful a commodity is and the exchange value of a commodity refers to how much we can get in exchange for a commodity if we were to sell it.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

In Robert Marks’ “The Industrial Revolution and Its Consequences, 1750-1850” Marks goes on to describe the end of the biological old regime and the beginning of Industrial Revolution that mechanized the world. In the old regime, people’s necessities all came exclusively from the land. However, in a revolution powered by coal, surplus goods could be manufactured in industries. This allowed the population capacity of the world to increase and a different set of challenges unseen in the old regime to arise.

Read More
1337 Words | 6 Pages

The Industrial Revolution cast its shadow upon European cities and towns. Some enjoyed this shade while others suffered tremendously because of it. Those who enjoyed the luxuries and wealth that the Industrial Revolution provided, the bourgeoisie, depended on the needs of the poor, the proletarians, to increase the size of their monstrous factories and ultimately their wealth and influence. In “The Communist Manifesto” Karl Marx discusses the effects of the Industrial Revolution in further dividing society by creating new social and economic hierarchies. In addition to his observation of the division of labor, Karl Marx believed, that due to the technological shift from craftsmanship to machinery this also caused division of labor and the appreciation of proletarian handmade goods was disregarded.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

The reading passage and the professor’s lecture discuss the Industrial Revolution and the great benefit brought by it to the United States. The author of the passage sustains that the Industrial Revolution rapidly spread in all the country for several factors that helped to proliferate it. The professor, in the same way, discusses the Industrial Revolution and he states some examples of how it has changed America. The author offers support for the Industrial Revolution stating that it originally took place in England in the 17th century and then it spread overseas. The professor concurs with the text, adding that English didn’t want the diffusion of the Industrial Revolution and it was illegal to export machines or design of them, and people

Read More

More about Andrew Ure: The Industrial Revolution

Related Topics

Open Document