Animal Bill Of Rights Essay

For many eras, animals and humans walked on the vast face of Earth as one. As human modernization quickly emerged, they soon realized that these animals are not able to speak up for themselves; not having feelings or emotions. This situation has brought up hundreds of topics on animal equality, which has become one of the most controversial debates in the world. Various groups have stated that animals should presented with an Animal Bill of Rights. They do this believing that animals are no different from people, yet some people do not realize that animals already have existing laws that benefit them. As a result, it proves that Animal Bill of Rights should not be created, due to the fact that it insite significant damage to scientific research that animals will provide. Other countries have already taken necessary steps to ensure that

In fact, in Jeremy Rifkin’s article, “A Change of Heart about Animals,” introduces two birds who were tested and observed to understand their conceptual abilities. In the articles it talks about how crow was able to produce a hook using its beak in order to gain access to food and was able to repeat the results nine out of 10 times. In result, if the Animal Bill of Rights were to be enacted such findings would not have been discovered and left us without knowing what these crows were capable of. On the other hand, it does seem inhuman to continue testing on animals for the benefits of our medicine, but without it we would not have many of the cures we currently have. For example animal research provided benefits with diseases such as smallpox, polio, insulin, diabetes, and many vaccines. Seeing that, many benefits were given due to the research of animal testing, if the Animal Bill of Rights were to be created it would hurt many research programs and the future of many