ipl-logo

Animal Testing Flaws

1714 Words7 Pages

Animal experimentation is a very noteworthy subject that has created quite a stir amongst the world. Anything from monkeys becoming anemic due to starvation to puppies with open sores from a new topical cream to relieve itching; animal experimentation is something that has been around since 129 AD. Testing human diseases or medicines on animals is factually not accurate, considering that there are so many differences between a human and a non-human animal. According to PETA, ASPCA, The Humane Society, and the article The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation by Aysha Akhtar, they explain that animal experimentation can be avoided and is an unnecessary step in today’s testing. Most humans typically care for non-human animals and take …show more content…

In the article The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation by Aysha Akhtar, she sums up the average truth and beliefs of someone who knows that this form of testing should be outlawed due to the unreliability of accurate results. In this article, Aysha reveals the validity and unreliability of testing on animals due to the differences in a growing and developing body compared to a helpless non-human animal with a different body make-up. She clearly discusses the number of animals that are being tested annually, “more than 115 million” (Akhtar, p. 407), with either human diseases or medical products. She goes on to say that obviously, medications and diseases should be further researched and have a prior evidence basis before being in contact with humans, though testing on such helpless animals that are not nearly as close to humans as they assume, give a unlikely truth to the results and do not clearly show the effects of medications or diseases would have on the average human (Akhtar, p. …show more content…

408). The models of a non-human animal are completely different than humans, they cannot reproduce the diseases to see the complexity of them. These animals are unable to show the signs that these diseases are actually doing to their little bodies compared to a human where we can speak and show emotions. When a human disease is artificially introduced to an animal, their bodies do not react or reproduce the same cells/disease over and over again till it multiplies and the researchers can see the effects and toll it takes on the animals’ bodies. The foreign disease is rejected by the animals in most cases, causing insufficient and false results (Akhtar, p. 410). The laboratories test many common human diseases and cannot accurately get the response from the animals that they are wanting or needing. Even if these laboratories continue to try to get the results perfect, like Aysha states, it is “highly unlikely to yield useful information about, human diseases” (Akhtar, p. 411) from animals that do not have the same model make-up as a human. Thus, the laboratories that continue to test to try and get accurate or pretentious results from these animals that are not accurately made like humans

Show More
Related

Scientific Boundaries In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

1132 Words | 5 Pages

Scientist have been overstepping boundaries in many parts of the scientific world, one of these being animal testing. Animal testing is when scientist test on animals and inject them or mutate their genes for a human gain, typically with no gain for the animal. The National Library of Medicine posted an article on the flaws and harms of animal experimentation, these flaws can be put in these, “...three major conditions undermine this confidence and explain why animal experimentation, regardless of the disease category studied, fails to reliably inform human health: (1) the effects of the laboratory environment and other variables on study outcomes, (2) disparities between animal models of disease and human diseases, and (3) species differences in physiology and genetics.” The first condition being the influence of laboratory procedures and environments on experimental results. The conditions in these experiments show that, “animals in laboratories are involuntarily placed in artificial environments, usually in windowless rooms, for the duration of their lives.

Read More

Animal Testing Dbq

796 Words | 4 Pages

Every year several million animals die due to animal testing in for medical, psychological, and products research. Moreover, animal testing is something that shouldn’t be continued and for it is completely wrong and cruel. Animal testing started in the late 300’s BC. Aristotle and Erasistratus performed many experiments that involved living animals. Similarly, Galen, a greek physician, conducted animals research to explore the field of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology.

Read More

Animal Testing Utilitarianism Essay

1794 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease ( Hau, J., & Schapiro, S. J. 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue it is moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a moral act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1)

Read More

Animal Experimentation Persuasive Essay

586 Words | 3 Pages

In “Medical Experiments on Animals Are an Important Element of Drug Development”, Patricia George and Geraldine Wagner claim that animal experimentation has helped treat such life-threatening diseases as rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, tetanus, and hepatitis. In “The Grim Good of Animal Research” Wesley J. Smith claims that animal experimentation helped transform AIDS from a universally fatal disease into a chronic affliction with which patients can live longer lives. This information shows how so many more people can live longer and healthier lives because of animal experimentation. Clearly, animal experimentation makes deadly diseases much less

Read More

Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

809 Words | 4 Pages

Testing on animals Testing on animals for human gain has been going on for centuries, and the process is not any more caring now than it was 100 years ago. Animals are treated poorly, and then more often than not they are destroyed. There are more humane ways for this testing to be done, and it needs to be implemented immediately. “How can painfully and artificially inducing human diseases in other species with a different genetic make-up to our own possibly advance the cause of modern medicine?” (Howe) New studies have been performed proving that mice are more genetically different from humans than we once thought.

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

2052 Words | 9 Pages

Animal experimentation has been an easy and ethically acceptable way to research and test medicines and treatments for humans since the time of the ancient Greeks. Animals opened the door for the scientists and philosophers of old to learn things about the human body that were previously explained with magic and superstition. Naturally, science has come a long way since the ancient Greeks. Today, we have a whole host of medical resources at our disposal, which begs the question: Do we truly need animals in medical research anymore? Not only that, but the practices with animals at thousands of labs across the United States have been notoriously vague for years.

Read More

The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing

604 Words | 3 Pages

Millions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.

Read More

Persuasive Speech On Animal Testing

1152 Words | 5 Pages

Animal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’

Read More

Is Animal Testing Wrong

883 Words | 4 Pages

First, humans test animals for cures that are supposed to work on humans, but testing only proves how it works on different animals. Secondly, when something is tested on animals and is proven safe and effective, it can still be useless or detrimental to humans

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

692 Words | 3 Pages

Instead it can be due to conservatism within the scientific establishment – it is easier and more comfortable to simply do what has always been done.” (Alternatives to Animal Testing) Experiment results on animals can be effortlessly compared to earlier tests on animals to give confidence to scientists. Testing on animals is effective and we get the appropriate information but we could do it faster, cheaper, and without harming anyone or anything. With the increasing sophistication of computers, the ability to ‘model’ or replicate aspects of the human body is ever more probable.

Read More

Animal Testing In Medical Research

1866 Words | 8 Pages

Abstract Animal testing the experiments performed on animals that are used to test the effectiveness and safety of a wide range of things, from medication to cosmetics. They are also used to understand how the human body works. Animal testing is one of the major controversial issues, but animal testing has dramatically contributed to science. First, some people think that animal testing should not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. However, medical research involving animal testing improved the health of human beings.

Read More

Animal Testing Arguments

777 Words | 4 Pages

Scientific innovation is based on trial and error. Experiment upon experiment is conducted in order to ensure that a certain hypothesis or treatment is valid or safe. However, there is a growing controversy behind the morality of certain types of testing; especially on animals. Scientists have been conducting experiments on animals for centuries, which has resulted in many medical advances that would have otherwise taken much longer to realize. Consequently though, a great multitude of people has begun to advocate for animal rights in this area.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

713 Words | 3 Pages

However, that line of thinking quickly clashes with the fact that with the help of exactly such testing, with the sacrifice of those animal lives, human lives are saved in return. Who are we to object to the expedition of finding a cure for someone’s son’s or daughter’s illness on the basis that it would be cruel toward some animals, which fact is not up for debate, it is indeed downright monstrous. And if one person had the conviction to deny themselves the cure, what gives them the right to forbid others from using it. In the end the simplest question presents itself, whether testing experimental drugs and treatments on humans is more sane and logical rather than animal testing, and then there is a line which might as well cease progress. A line which demands not to be crossed, the line that demands human lives be handled with caution and care, the line which will cause baby steps instead of strives

Read More

Animal Rights And Moral Obligations On Animals Essay

734 Words | 3 Pages

Güray Yiğit 101-1 Mr. Dunkley December 18, 2015 Animal rights and moral obligations on animals are the most disputable issues of our century. The use of nonhuman animals in researches is a subject of concern which is highly concern that everyone is looking at this issue from various different perspectives. Gary L. Francione looks from both of the sides that whether we have rights to use animals laboratory experimentations or not, by giving different arguments about the issue of biomedical research. Many people believe that it is inaccurate how animals suffer unreasonably. In animal testing, nonhuman animals are used to test the possible harms and exhibit the level of effectiveness of products in the fields of medicine and cosmestics.

Read More

Should Animal Testing Be Banned

967 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Read More

More about Animal Testing Flaws

Open Document