ipl-logo

Brutus And Antony Compare And Contrast Essay

560 Words3 Pages

Compare and Contrast Essay Which speech was more persuasive, Brutus’s or Antony’s? Both speeches were very persuasive to their audiences, but only one was more successful than the other. One must look at these and decide who was better. Therefore, one must look at the similarities to find their strongest points and to see how they drawn in the crowd. Not only that, but also locate the key differences to find their flaws, or to find out how they executed their speeches with different approaches. Above all, the true victor, of persuasion, was Antony. Brutus and Antony had quite a few comparable moments within their speeches. Both Brutus and Antony managed to analyze their audiences, and in doing so, they used it for their own advantage. Neither Brutus’s crowd nor Antony’s crowd of citizens understood their use of Rhetoric as both crowds seem to agree with the two (III, …show more content…

Brutus uses logic and his honor to Rome, (III, ii, 14-17) while Antony uses his emotions. In addition, Brutus explains he killed Caesar for he was too ambitious, (III, ii, 27) meanwhile, Antony explains that Brutus did an act of terror, (III, ii, 191-192). Brutus sought to calm down the citizens with his speech, but Antony sought to persuade the citizens to revolt against Brutus and his conspirators (III, ii, 164-192). After piecing together the evidence it’s clear that Antony had delivered the better persuasive speech. Antony’s speech was much more persuasive than Brutus’s speech. Throughout Antony’s speech, he successfully used the aspect of pathos. Antony revealed his emotions with the plebeians throughout his speech, but (III, ii, 164-192) was the most memorable. Antony used sarcasm towards Brutus and his conspiracy, calling them “honorable men”, (III,ii, 97). Overall, Antony knew his audience well. He knew the citizens were not intelligent to take in the information and process it to argue against

Show More
Related

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

592 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus speech in many ways differed from Antony’s speech. He used plenty of ethos and pathos but failed to use logos, Which Antony utilizes fairly well. A good example of pathos in famous speeches is Martin Luther King Jr’s “I have a dream”

Read More

Brutus And Marc Antony Rhetorical Analysis

777 Words | 4 Pages

Knowledge of the audience and rebuttals were his main weapons. Because of Marc Antony’s masterful use of ethos, repetition, and awareness of the audience, his speech was superior, and rings out in history more than Brutus’ speech. Although pathos and logos are important, both Brutus and Marc Antony primarily

Read More

Use Of Pathos In Julius Caesar

671 Words | 3 Pages

In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,

Read More

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

531 Words | 3 Pages

The remark, “Both speeches had their unique own way of addressing the crowd as well as differing styles and techniques” on the website (classicnetworks.com). Brutus’s character was defined as a smart, honorable person, who appealed more to logical facts. Antony’s character appealed more to a loving person. He was understanding, and he usually attached more to people’s emotions.

Read More

Does Shakespeare Use Ethos In Julius Caesar Persuasive

159 Words | 1 Pages

Antony is more persuasive than Brutus, because he is more personal to the people. Antony starts off his speech with being personal to the people with saying, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend

Read More

Brutus Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar's Death

706 Words | 3 Pages

Antony and Brutus did not get along they both had two different point of views. They both wanted the best for the people however they had distinctive ways to prove to Rome how they felt and what they think was best. In their speeches they explain and give reasonings behind their theory on why they think Caesar is better off dead and how they think they are going to fix Rome. Brutus and Antony both used Ethos in their speeches to give credibility.

Read More

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

445 Words | 2 Pages

By Act III, scene 1, when he meets the conspirators, it is easy to see that Antony is ironical and that he means different things in almost everything that he says. At the funeral Brutus is overmatched by Antony’s duplicity and oratory. Antony uses rhetoric and histrionics and incites the crowd into mob frenzy. His speech has the function to annul Brutus’ explanation of Caesar’s murder, hide his intentions of revenge against the conspirators, and also to leave their brutal actions out in the

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

437 Words | 2 Pages

After reading excerpts from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, write an essay that compares Brutus’ speech with Marc Antony’s speech and argues the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) used in each. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts. William Shakespeare writes a play about Julius Caesar’s assassination and the speeches his friends gave at his funeral. In the play, Brutus assassinated Caesar because he thought he was protecting Rome. He was saying that if Caesar got all the power he would most likely become vicious and make everyone his slaves.

Read More

Antony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar

949 Words | 4 Pages

Antony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech

721 Words | 3 Pages

The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”

Read More

Renaissance Humanism In 'The Praise Of Folly'

1629 Words | 7 Pages

As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; // as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; // as he was valiant, I honour him: // but, as he was ambitious, I slew him” (JC, 3.2.20-30), leaves the mob more disturbed and bitter than ever before they succumb to Antony’s appeal to emotion as he continues to exploit their self-love. Brutus’s naïve belief that he has successfully justified his actions in the eyes of the Romans with such a short speech lacking any self-love is a sign of his naivety – a form of foolishness that lacks folly. On the other hand, Antony’s long speech is brave and fearless – a sign of a fool who embodies folly. According to Folly, “I [folly] is also the champion of prudence” (Folly, 27) as prudence is derived from experience, and men who lack

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More

Brutus Funeral Speech Essay

848 Words | 4 Pages

They both had strong speeches in their logos. Brutus told the people that Caesar was killed for a reason by stating “had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, above all/ freemen?” (3.2 24-26). Brutus was telling the people that since Caesar are dead, everyone can be free and no one should have to be slaves by force. Even though that Brutus won in ethos and pathos, Antony had a slightly stronger logos appeal.

Read More

Rhetorical Appeals In Brutus

755 Words | 4 Pages

In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech

824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More

More about Brutus And Antony Compare And Contrast Essay

Open Document