Following the death of the infamous Caesar in Rome, both Brutus and Antony gave speeches, in which shaped Act III. Throughout the play, rhetorical devices such as logos, pathos, and ethos were used. Both characters had well developed reasonings for what they truly believed in, however one person’s speech captured the people of Rome’s heart. “Understanding does not cure evil, but it is a definite help, in as much as one can cope with a comprehensible darkness” (Jung). Although, one question stuck out. Who was worthy enough to gain the power over the people of Rome? The usage of logos, ethos, and pathos was a main role in the play of Julius Caesar. It caused a diversity between the ordinary people of Rome, and the main characters in the play. It was easy to point out who favored either logos, ethos, or pathos. The remark, “Both speeches had their unique own way of addressing the crowd as well as differing styles and techniques” on the website (classicnetworks.com). Brutus’s character was defined as a smart, honorable person, who appealed more to logical facts. Antony’s character appealed more to a loving person. He was understanding, and he usually attached more to people’s emotions. …show more content…
His biggest mistake was failing to understand/learn about his audience, before assuming that they would agree with more of a logical explanation. This mistake caused a huge downfall in his plan to convince the people of Rome. Brutus stated more facts of his reasoning for killing Caesar. For example, he said, “Hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear”, (Elements of Literature 831). This saying alone, gave off the impression that Brutus used a different tone to attempt to sway the audience. The saying, “Censure me in your wisdom, and wake your senses” (Elements of Literature