ipl-logo

Apple Vs FBI Case Study

1005 Words5 Pages

Apple V. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Apple v FBI is a court case involving the San Bernardino terror attack, This Terror attack killed 14 Innocent civilians and the two perpetrators Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen malik. The two terrorist’s motives are still under investigation but it’s believed they Supported ISIS and that they were radicalized two years before the attack. When they did the attack on December 2nd 2015. The attack killed 14 people and others were injured before both being killed by police.

The two terrorists had several phones with them they destroyed all of the phones except for one IPhone this IPhone is what the court case is about. The FBI found the iPhone Owned by San Bernardino county and they realized that the phone was locked so they asked apple to give them the data so apple gave them the ICloud backup. The backup was made weeks before the attack so the FBI wanted apple to force a backup on the phone so apple told them connect the phone to a recognized Internet connection so they could force an iCloud backup. …show more content…

What this means is the phone and the cloud can’t recognize each other. Even if they changed the password back it would be a different encryption code. So the FBI went to apple and asked can you give us the data apple said no because the IPhone is End to end encrypted. Then the FBI asked them can’t you make a custom IOS to disable these security functionalities for this phone apple said no. Since apple said no the FBI they went to a judge and asked can you give us a court order to force apple to make this IOS. The Judge ordered apple to comply with the FBI’s demand Apple said no and is Appealing the court

Show More
Related
576 Words | 3 Pages

In many investigations, electronic devices are used as an essential assent for solving crimes. One example of this is, Carpenter v. United States, Carpenter was believed to be a part of multiple robberies. MetroPCS, a wireless carrier, gave law enforcement four months of location records to help solve the case. By doing this, officers were able to track more than twelve hundred location point were Carpenter was using his phone, some of the points

Read More
1299 Words | 6 Pages

Alito wrote a concurring opinion to address two separate points. The first being that rules set in place in relation to searches with arrests were established a long time ago and are not exclusively set in place to protect arresting officers or to prevent the destruction of evidence. Secondly, Alito notes that the laws set in place that govern arrest and seizure of property date back centuries ago and may not be applicable to the changing world around us. Alito stated that courts should not apply a rule that was used in the “pre-digital era” to search a cell phone, especially when cell phones can be used not only to access loads of information, but can store personal information as well. Alito stated that the law enforcement officers need a set of clear rules regarding searches incident to arrest.

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

Roberts. The Court’s decision was a unanimous 9-0 in favor of David Riley (Oyez, “Riley v. California”). This means that there was no dissenting opinion because the all the judges voted the same. In the judges statement says that it is unnecessary to search the phone right away because it can just be held until a proper warrant is obtained. The judges also claimed that because of the “Cloud” most of the information that would be searched is not technically in physical possession of the person.(Oyez, “Riley v. California”).

Read More
1596 Words | 7 Pages

Roberts reasoning for this decision is that a phones data is harmless therefore confiscating it without a warrant should not be necessary. Unless the phone contained a weapon inside of it or its case, such as a small knife or razor blade, then it should be confiscated immediately because of the fact that an officer feels immediate harm due to the weapon. Justice Roberts also stated that if an officer is attempting to preserve the phone for evidence they should disconnect the phone from the network and place the phone in a bag for later research. An officer shouldn’t be allowed to view any data on a cell phone or any time of computer. Justice Alito, another judge that was involved in this case concurred in the judgement by stating, “I agree with the Court law that law enforcement officers, in conducting a lawful search incident to arrest, must generally obtain a warrant before searching information stored or accessible on a cell phone.”

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

Most people know the story of how President Lincoln was assassinated at Ford’s Theater. He was shot in the head by the now infamous, John Wilkes Booth, who then fled the theater, riding a horse south into the former confederate states. He was eventually found and shot, ending a long search. Most people, however, don’t realize how badly he wanted to commit the act. The most important theme in James Swanson’s Chasing Lincoln’s Killer, is that by having extremely strong feelings or very fond beliefs towards a cause, you may end up doing something risky or even insane just to support that cause; which he proves to have been relevant even in the mid-1800’s.

Read More
1346 Words | 6 Pages

The writ questioned “Whether or under what circumstances the Fourth Amendment permits police officers to conduct a warrantless search of the digital contents of an individual’s cell phone seized from the person at the time of arrest”, SCOTUSblog.com; and it was granted on January 17, 2014 in part because Federal and State Courts had openly divided opinions over this issue. Riley v. California was argued on April 29, 2014 and a decision was made on June 25, 2014. The Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. declared by a unanimous decision that a warrantless cell phone search violates the Fourth Amendment right to privacy. The court stated that the warrantless search exception (SITA) does not apply to this case because digital data store in an electronic device cannot be used as a weapon to harm officers. Although, the court recognizes that possible evidence stored on a cell phone may be wiped remotely, it also acknowledges that it could be avoided by disconnecting the cell phone from the network and placing it in a Faraday bag.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

As written above the government has the ability to search and seize ones technological content in order to preserve evidence if they need to. They also have the ability to search and seize anybody that owns a cellphone, computer, or any technological devices. Looking back on the case of Riley v. California, David Riley had his cell phone seized into evidence and searched, which led in part to his conviction in a San Diego, California, before it was overturned. In a similar case Wurie v. California, Brima Wurie had two of his cell phones seized upon his arrest. After his indictment Wurie filed a motion to suppress the evidence obtained through a warrantless search of his cell phone.

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

This concern led to absence of expertise dependability on the part of the state. It was out of this failing that the state had a direct impact on the case. This aggravating conduct provides a superb outline for prospective courts, owing to the fact that the methodologies engaged by the FBI do not diverge considerably across circumstances. This exceedingly speculative testimony brings about concerns to the courts on the specifics that should be of concern in such

Read More
164 Words | 1 Pages

The Fourth Amendment requires a probable cause for arrest. Substantially, particular things are needed to legally conduct a search or seizure. This incorporates arrest, so a search, a seizure, or an arrest cannot take place without reason. Not to mention, there must be a "court order" for Apple to give the government "customer data." So, since a “court order” must be in place for Apple to give the government “customer data,” that “court order” would have to also take place for an arrest that could conceivably follow.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

I fear due to the recent rulings on the Patriot Act and NSA may allow people who utilize Apple’s newest feature may find that they may face a subpoena to open their phones and consequently have them used against them. As seen in the Salinas case refusal to do so may preemptively determine the defendant guilty for choosing to protect their privacy. As companies like Apple and Google push to make our communications more secure to cater toward their clientele. It will be interesting to see how the fifth amendment will apply in a digital age and to see what measures will be taken to protect or limit our

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

Apple is trying to protect the American people that own any apple product from the FBI. The FBI wants apple to unlock the phone from the San Bernardino 's but Apple is not doing it because it is against the 4th amendment. Since the FBI can’t get into it because Apple can not give permission to the FBI, also they don’t have any reason to look at the phone so Apple did not allow tat to happen. My opinion on this matter is that apple is doing the right thing, if the government was able to get a hold of all the information that a single person had on their phone, I am pretty sure people would be embarrassed because of all the personal information on their phones. If Apple gave them the right to look through their phone than the 4th amendment would be compromised and then that can start an up riot.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

(Source 1.2) If the government wanted to go further than top-line data, for example listening to someone’s phone calls that is when the government needs to go to a federal judge. Furthermore, a judge and the government work together so everyone's privacy is protected and that is their

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

The Verdict discussed how both cases were attempting to suppress evidence from their cell phones which now contain much more information than they once did. Cases like this continue to shape our rights. The fourth amendment is here to protect ourselves from being incriminated. In modern day the fourth amendment is in question due to new technology.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

Robert Mugabe, once a beloved freedom fighter that was to bring liberty and independence to an entire nation and its people. Now, a tyrant and a dictator who has clung to power for more than 30 years and is still showing no sign of letting go. He has ruled the country with an iron fist and anyone who has dared oppose him has been imprisoned, tortured or killed. It is estimated that Mugabe has stolen approximately 10 billion US Dollars from the people of Zimbabwe, most of it coming from the rich diamonds deposits possessed by the country. Zimbabwe, once a wealthy and rich country with a promising future, has been laid to waste by one single man.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

His trial was not a very long because they had been chasing him for years and tracking his activities. So, the FBI already had their evidence against Abagnale. The plaintiff in this court proceeding was none other than than the United States itself because he had committed federal crimes. The defendant was Frank Abagnale Jr. The decision was quite clear.

Read More

More about Apple Vs FBI Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document