ipl-logo

Are Parental Advisory Labels Still Impacting The Music Industry Like They Used To?

731 Words3 Pages

Introduction Should CDs carry warning labels about bad language? CDs first started carrying warning

labels in 1985. This originated from concerned and utterly troubled parents. So as the Recording

Industry Association of America (RIAA)wanted to take full responsibility they put into effect

PAL or the Parental Advisory Label. Then soon the 1990s would be thriving with the Parental

Advisory Label or Warning Label and parents would be loving it. Soon kids all around America

would be getting CDs based on the Parental Advisory Label. Today we find a different verdict

because …show more content…

Let’s be honest, shouldn’t parents be more

responsible? You shouldn’t need a sticker to tell you what your kid can and cannot listen to.

Are these parents trying to blame everyone else for their lack of parenting? Now we’re back to

the question at hand, should CDs carry warning labels about bad language? Absolutely Not!!

Are Parental Advisory Labels Still Impacting The Music Industry Like They Used To?

Are Parental Advisory Labels still impacting the music industry? No, and here's why. What

parents would likely consider inappropriate or unfit in the 1990s is socially acceptable and

normalized in today’s time. The music industry has changed drastically over the years causing

people to drift from the old ways of the music industry. Now instead of going to the record store

everything can be bought or streamed digitally at any time anywhere. Sure parents can still try to

regulate what their son or daughter can listen to but, the times we’re in now music is easily

accessible to anyone. The Parental Advisory Label was once a staple in the music industry but,

Now it’s hard to believe that it plays hardly any part in what kids listen to today.

Inappropriate Music Will Always Be …show more content…

Albums of

Today's time still stream with a vast majority of those streams being youth. So did the PAL

really stop minors from pursuing inappropriate music?

A Parent’s Responsibility

The Parental Advisory Label was the product of a group of parents in 1985 concerned about

the explicit language in different songs but, this leaves many people with the question..Can a

simple warning label sticker prevent minors from listening to explicit songs? Parents are

expecting a warning label to do their job as a parent. Newsleek quoted a father of two by the

name of Michael Anes he stated “I think the desire to control what your kids see and hear is a

tacit admission of your own failure as a parent.” Although the Recording Industry Association of

America did what they felt they could, parents still need to take accountability for their kids

listening to explicit music. There is only so much someone else can do regarding your kid that

may or may not make a difference. It isn’t the artist who needs to censor their lyrics. It isn’t the

recording industry who needs to add warning labels. It’s the parents who need to

Show More
Related
1406 Words | 6 Pages

This concerning parents made them not want their children listening to heavy metal music and would also sue some of the bands for the death of their children. This according to Klosterman was absurd because and I quote, "And one would assume that any kid so obsessed with a record that he's going to fucking kill himself over it would take the time to listen to the lyrics (or at least read the liner notes!)" (Klosterman p. 47). This part in the book really aggravated Klosterman, because music and the bands never go out and say kill yourselves.

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Blei’s argument, as to why banning the book is counter productive, is very insightful. While other critics argue that the profanities in the book should be ignored when considering banning the book, Blei accepts the profanities and points out that there are a multitude of other ways for kids to be exposed to such things in their

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

Parents are more likely to have alternative objectives to the type of education their children receive, and can have a variety of reasons as to why they strongly suggest removing a sensitive book from their or other

Read More
1800 Words | 8 Pages

Many claims have been made stating that sexual content, offensive language, and unsuitable for all ages are reasons some books shouldn’t be on shelves. Censorship is continuing to affect authors each and every day,

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

“Censoring books that deal with difficult, adolescent issues does not protect anybody. Quite the opposite. It leaves kids in the darkness and makes them vulnerable. Censorship is the child of fear and the father of ignorance .

Read More
1719 Words | 7 Pages

(2019, October 28).  Sex, Nudity, and Satanism Are Why Parents Believe In School Book Censorship. BOOK RIOT. https://bookriot.com/why-parents-censor-books/

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

Censorship protects kids. In the article entitled “What Children Need is Censorship”, Aric Sigman remarks, “The difference between a child and an adult is that children are more vulnerable to the effects of everything from sunburn and alcohol to ideas and images.” Children are easily influenced most of the time. When they see adults doing things, they wanna do it, too. Sigman also says while free speech may be a laudable aim between adults, the concept is now being used primarily by commercial interests to speak freely to our children.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

“The state of kids publishing is such that it’s perfectly reasonable to be concerned about what agenda-driven and/or prurient content they’re peddling.” (Hemingway) This means it is very reasonable for everyone to be concerned about what the kids and young adults are reading. If parents are not concerned about what their child is reading, their child will follow many bad influences from books they have read. There are many influential books such as The Outsiders, by S.E Hinton that should be banned.

Read More
1750 Words | 7 Pages

If you really want a book not to be read by an adolescent, banning the book will often have an opposite effect. Although it contains sensitive topics and harsh language, The Secret Life of Bees should not be banned in high schools because students are not only mature enough to handle these issues but should, in fact, be exposed to them in an educational environment to help in the development of their maturing minds. Being exposed to course language at too early an age can often have negative effects on adolescent development. Profanity is inappropriate in a school setting so why should students be assigned to read a book that contains it? Most learn curse words at a very young age, and the foul language displayed is not used to promote vulgarity but rather to add a sense of realism to the narrative.

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

Children just like us have a mind of their own and should be able to make their own decisions by themselves to either pick up the book or to leave it alone. Censorship does not exist in public places such as stores even though children enter stores everyday these kids have learned the decency of what they should or should not do they learned what they want and what they do not want what they like and what they do not like that should be a reason that children should be able to make censorship their choice.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

A parent or the student should be the one who decided whether or not the book is appropriate. Also, when a child is sheltered from the world, a book with just a bit of adult material could help them understand what really happens. It could prepare them so when they do become older and get a job, the world doesn’t put them into complete shock. Taken from Common Reasons for Banning Books, “…it is important that the reader makes his/her judgments on the book.” To elaborate on this, another person shouldn’t tell a student what and what not to read.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

(Sherman Alexie) Sherman also had to say that, “Parents should be in more control of what their child reads. They should have the control of how their kid deals with the information.” (Sherman Alexie) Sherman and many other authors feel the same way. Most books and much other types of media can be banned due to the slightest bit of profanity.

Read More
1134 Words | 5 Pages

Children are young and it is nearly a unanimous conclusion that there are types of media in the world that they should not be exposed to very young, this is why censorship of libraries is acceptable when it involves

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

In addition to this, most kids in middle school agree. A survey done by Luke Banks shows that 53% of kids age 12 to 15 think that we should have censorship. This means that censorship in libraries is restricting certain material from some groups of people. Many books or magazines today show explicit material. Without censoring

Read More
1617 Words | 7 Pages

First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from

Read More

More about Are Parental Advisory Labels Still Impacting The Music Industry Like They Used To?

Related Topics

Open Document