ipl-logo

Essay On Guns Do Not Kill

910 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Possible causes of gun violence

Guns Do Not Kill “Chinese fire lances, recognized as the world’s first guns, were invented in the tenth century of bamboo and gunpowder” (Harder 2). Over time, guns have improved causing a greater threat to modern day society. “Since the National Act of Firearms was passed in 1934, gun control has been a controversial topic throughout America” (Tim 1). Due to the multiple, past, mass shootings, politicians are debating the complete despotism of guns. If the right to bear arms is completely removed from American citizens, criminals will be the only ones with guns causing a threat to everyone. The right to possess this type of machinery should be legal because guns do not kill people, people kill people.
“The right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Written by James
Madison in 1789 and soon, three years later, adopted into the Constitution in 1791, the Second Amendment clearly states that citizens have the right to keep and own arms. It also declares that the privilege shall not be infringed and has no exceptions. This means that the government can not undermine or restrict this idea. But, since this is a constitutional right, it should be seen as and is absolute. Gun control laws infringe …show more content…

“Even United States bishops have debated with each other about the call for restrictions on civilian access to assault weapons. Some even stress that the Church supports the right of self defense” (Fraga 1). It is true that there is more than verse in the Bible that stresses the civilian need for self defense. “For example, 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 states, “Or know ye not that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit which is in you, which ye have from God? and ye are not your own; For ye were bought with a price: glorify God therefore in your body”. This teaches that we need to preserve life, our own lives and the lives of others” (The Biblical Use of Self Defense

Show More
Related
1615 Words | 7 Pages

When the original people wrote the amendments they had no clue the advancement of guns that would come in the future ( ). In the end, no guns should be carried around like

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

Updating the Amendment 2.0 The right to bear arms has been a favoured constitutional law since its establishment in 1791, but as more gun related violence and accidents occur, there has been increasing debate on whether or not guns should be banned in the US altogether, and if not, what regulations should be required for the purchase and handling of them. While guns should not be completely banned from the country, the rules and regulations of gun laws should be tightened. In the 2nd amendment, it clearly states that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” While this statement still holds true, the evolution of firearms and how they have become more dangerous throughout the years is a clear sign of why the laws should be changed.

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

In the constitution it states, that its our right to bear arms. Were allowed to keep guns in our possession for fun or just protection. 59% of homes in america have a firearm which can be stolen from other people and soon your guns will become a part of illegal gun trafficking. When gun control laws came in affect gun crime spiked to 89% or 18 million cases for gun

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”(Second Amendment). In many situations, people think that banning civilian guns would help crime lower, but in reality this would make them helpless. Many

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

Say a thief broke into your house and he killed your children, and the only thing left for you to do to protect your wife is to take that gun or sword off the wall and do what needs to be done? What would you do in this situation, let him just kill you and your wife, or defend yourself? So the big question here is, do you think Christians should be allowed bear the sword for the right reason? With a lot of research and debates, I have come to the belief that Christians should be allowed to bear the sword.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

For violent crimes (assault, robbery and rape) guns were used 0.83% of the time in self-defense. In 20% of the self defense incidents, the guns were used by police

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

For advocates of the second amendment, the right to bear arms applies to all Americans for self-protection against dangerous criminals. Criminals will always have access to weapons, therefore citizens need self-protection using firearms. John Lott, in “More Guns, Less Crime,” explains that crime fell by 10 percent in Texas in the year after a law had passed letting citizens carry weapons ( Martin 10). This evidence shows that if more citizens were armed for example, the citizens in Texas, less crime would occur in America. Although those in favor of the second amendment believe that arms are used in self-protection, they also believe it is an individual right and oppose strict gun control laws as

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

Some people might say that we need a gun to protect ourselves in the United States, but there are actually various ways to protect ourselves instead of using a gun according to the article, “How Americans Protect Themselves from Crime.” Transition to Conclusion: before the government legislates about the gun control law, we need to be the spearhead that is awake to this problem deeply and carefully. Restate Thesis: I am convinced that the entire civilian should not own guns to prevent the gun violence, and only government officers must be able to own guns. Review Main Points: we realize that erroneous gun possession contributes to horrible gun accidents.

Read More
1991 Words | 8 Pages

The Second Amendment says, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun rights has become the subject of intense political, social, and cultural battles for much of the last century. The pro-gun right side has asserted that the right to arms was absolute, and that any gun control laws infringed that right (Kopel, 2013). This right has been supported by the Supreme Court who has reinforced what has become the American consensus that the Second Amendment allows the right to keep and bear arms, especially for self-defense, and that it is a fundamental individual

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

A weapon in the wrongs hands is the maximum danger humanity can face. Nowadays, violence and delinquency in society are viewed as the maximum problem solver. Humanity is full of chaos; hate and envy seize our souls. Guns are the ultimate security for some citizens but for others, these add to a feeling of defenselessness. Throughout history, any topic related to guns means a plethora of problems.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

"Research consistently shows that having a gun is the safest way to respond to any type of criminal attack, especially these multiple victim shootings” says Dr. John Lott, an astute resident at the American Enterprise Institute and author of the famous book “More Guns, Less Crime”. Most criminals don’t want to fight, but in the case that the criminal is bent on leaving no witnesses, I would like to have a gun. America is built on freedom and people have the freedom to not carry a gun, but do not impede my freedom to carry one. If having a gun is the safest way to respond to any type of criminal attack then any reasonable person should come to the conclusion that people should be allowed to concealed carry a firearm in public.

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

Gun control also limits our constitutionally derived right to own firearms. If gun control is enforced, law-abiding citizens will be forced to give up their guns and their right to own guns, while many criminals who own guns may illegally keep theirs. As the saying goes “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” Guns are an important aspect of our society in many ways. They allow for protection, recreation, and hunting.

Read More
1072 Words | 5 Pages

The conflict I choose to analyze is the argument regarding whether playing aggressive video games leads to violent behavior in youth and teens. For the last several decades there have been claims that violent video games have promoted an increase in violence in young people and teenagers. There has been an increase in violent school shootings over this time and many people feel it is an effect of the games. Every time there is a school shooting or violent act or terrorism, the media and experts begin to argue or debate the reasons for the violence There are many theories and there have been many studies and opinions on what the reasons for the increase in these events might be. One common topic that seems to be discussed is whether or not exposure

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Every right that humans possess, such as the right to life and the for example the right to not be murdered or lied to, are not given to us by the government or man alone but by God who has given it to us through his word. When a government oversees the collective protection of the people by specified laws, the people as individuals no longer have the rights given to them by God, but rather rights decided for them by man. The laws that are meant to protect the collective whole thwarts the individual, and in the case of gun control, villainizes them simply because of someone else’s choice to dismiss someone else’s right, for example to live and not to be shot. So, instead of embracing entire control concerning protection to the government, it should be seen that the people themselves have the choice of what protection contains and what is a dismissal of their rights as human beings, parallel to what God has given rights

Read More

More about Essay On Guns Do Not Kill

Related Topics

Open Document