Every parent aspires to be the best parent, ultimately by meeting their infants’ needs and most importantly by spending quality time and attending to them (Kelly). However, there comes the demanding moment when mothers of babies have too many commitments to attend to them fully. Whereas daycares come in handy to alleviate this problem, there are occasions that have shed doubt over their indented value to the children. First, it must be noted with emphasis that as much as the day cares are simply ‘waiting bays’ for the children as their parents engage in their daily tasks, they turn out to be very instrumental in the development of the children, owing to the huge amount of time spent there. This paper draws from previous research performed by scholars to frame the thesis that day cares have continually lost their fundamental meaning, and modern parents ought to look for safer and sound alternatives.
Firstly, day cares Kelly illustrates that proper childhood
…show more content…
Through her case, Kelly draws the image that children deserve a serene environment free from harassment or traces of inadequate love for social development. With that in mind, Neatherlin’s case of mistreatment of infants at Little Giggles is recipe of the sad case that we have just seen in Marilyn (Wootson). While it cannot be conclusively said that all daycares have irresponsible attendants and nannies like the former, the fact that the vice had been going on for six years raises fears on how to recognize potential risk, even in the most innocent facilities. Technically, Wootson and Kelly suggest that any concerned parent must avoid the uncertainty of the care of their infant by assuming the role themselves. In a nutshell, children under care that is not from their parents are exposed to untold experiences that maybe detrimental, either from peers or uncaring