There is a question that has been argued since the beginning of the to the history of the U.S. That question is “should the U.S government place in an gun control laws”. Of course the answer is no we should not have gun control laws. After all it is the second amendment that we have the right to bare arms (guns) and it says that we can own and use guns in the U.S. This is the most important reasons because it shows that we as a country can have guns to hunt and in case we need to, over through are current government. It also gives us as a people a fighting chance if the country is invented by a foreign power. In addition it was calculated that gun control laws do not deter crime gun ownership dose. In other words this shows that people that might want to robe a business or a home and someone that is in that certain place has a gun than, they can scare them out of that property. And stop them from stealing anything. Also if you have an concealed carry (allowing you to carry a gun in secret) you can fight off some one on the street who comes at you, they can be stopped. …show more content…
But in reality it would not. An example of this is that Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in the world, but this country also has the largest amount of gun murders in the world. In fact gun control laws and lower gun ownership would not lower suicides and murders. In other words if you want to kill yourself or others then you will find another way to do these dark things. And having a gun would stop the murder in self defence. Others might say that guns are rarely used in self-defense. Although that might be true, but there are more murder prevention's if the person has the very same thing, a