ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Internet Privacy

916 Words4 Pages

INTERNET PRIVACY When we say Internet maybe in our mind it’s about our social media right? But what does it mean when we say Internet Privacy? Internet Privacy, it involves the right or mandate of personal “Privacy” concerning the storing, repurposing, provision to third parties, and displaying of information pertaining to oneself via of the “Internet”. It is also a subset of “Data Privacy”. Privacy concerns have been articulated from the beginnings of large scale computer sharing. The Internet Privacy also has a risk because there are many ways in which people can divulge their personal information, for instance by use of “Social Media” and by sending bank and credit card information to various websites. Moreover, directly observed …show more content…

Device fingerprinting uses data from the device and browser sessions to determine the risk of conducting business with the person using device. It is difficult to surf the web without being tracked by device fingerprinting today. However, for people who do not want device fingerprinting, there are ways to attempt to block fingerprinting. The only ways to stop device fingerprinting cause web browsing to be very slow and websites to display information incorrectly. Trying to avoid device fingerprinting is mostly just impractical and …show more content…

Users have a tendency to skim internet privacy policies information regarding the distribution of personal information only, and the more legalistic the policies appear, the less likely users are to even read the information. Furthermore, if the user has already done business with a company, or is previously familiar with a product, they have a tendency to not read privacy policies that the company has posted. As internet companies become more established, their policies may change, but their clients will be less likely to inform themselves of the

Show More
Related
491 Words | 2 Pages

With this question, privacy v. safety concerns came up. With this concern, The Petitioner, Riley and his lawyers, argued that smart phones simply contain too much personal information to be legally searched by police without a warrant. Many argues that smart phones reveal the most private thoughts of the average American, containing extensive records of the book read, websites visited, and conversations with friends and family of the owner. They also argue that constitutional protections will be surrendered if police can search the smart phone of every American arrested without a warrant. The Petitioner further contend that smart phones are every bit as sophisticated as personal computers and need to be treated as such and can be through of as a window into the owner’s mind.

Read More
1060 Words | 5 Pages

Choose to use apps and services that notify you, in plain language, what information they collect and why”. Trapani presents the problem and offers a solution for readers. Like Felten she shows that there is a problem but also helps the reader by giving them an answer. The common reader will not be able to make changes in the application making process, which Trapani knows, but they can be aware of the danger and look to avoid putting themselves in situations where they lose privacy. Her argument is clear and simple, which is perfect for the common app user who may not be an expert.

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

In the article “Should Stores Be Allowed to Spy on you?” By Joshua Peters. It explains how many stores have been spying on their customers using phone tracking. This allows many stores to collect data on you to try to make you buy more things.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

Cell phones and other mobile devices have quickly entered the mass market and are available to most people around the world. These devices are so prevalent that it is now considered rare to make an arrest without encountering them as some form of evidence, primarily because of the amount of data that they contain. The 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution includes the right of citizens to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures without a warrant issued upon probable cause, but whether or not such searches and seizures of the digital content contained in these devices is included in this fundamental protection is an issue that has been under much scrutiny over the past few decades. In order to decide whether it is,

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

Fingerprinting is method based on the uniqueness of the skin pattern - that is, each person has a completely individual pattern of papillary lines. These patterns do not change throughout life and have the property of recovering from damage to the skin in its previous form. On the one hand, this method almost completely eliminates the mistake, and on the other hand it is very cheap and easy to use (in contrast the method of identification of a person by DNA). Fingerprinting allows: 1) to identify the person who left the prints, according to the general and particular features of the papillary pattern displayed on them; 2) to exclude individual from among those who have touched the object; 3) to narrow the group of individuals suspected of the particular crime (for instance, provided that the imprint shows traces of a scar, a burn, a wart or some other distinctive feature).

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

Your lockers and bags can be searched, your phones can be confiscated by teachers, and surveillance cameras in the hallways and parking lots shows that no matter what you do not have the right to privacy. Additionally, even when you send out an email or text it does not go straight to your desired destination. It goes from your device to an archiving service and then to the person you want to receive it. This service can find any contact you have made with anyone electronically within seconds. So many forms of communication and technology usage is tracked and many Americans do not even realize.

Read More
169 Words | 1 Pages

The whole point of the Fourth Amendment is not to completely stop the police, because the amendment can be waived if an officer has a warrant, or a person’s consent. The Fourth Amendment states that generally a search or seizure is illegal unless there is a warrant, or special circumstances. Technically stating that a citizen is protected by the Fourth Amendment, until a government employee gets a warrant, and then they can invade a citizen’s privacy. Also people state that the FISA Court’s warrants are constitutional, but the NSA’s surveillance is unconstitutional. Even though people do not like the NSA’s surveillance, the NSA is legal because the FISA Court that the people did not mind makes it legal.

Read More
178 Words | 1 Pages

In the article “Figuring Out the Future of Online Privacy”, Heather Kelly states couple difficulties companies face to reach a efficient level of privacy in the future. First, companies must serve the right balance between advertisers and customer’s privacy concerns. For example, it is important to attract consumers to use their browser, but it is also important for them to serve their advertisers, because the money are flowing in from the advertisers. Second, “do not track” has been difficult to enforce, even though most major browsers offer the option of “do not track”. To be specific, there are ways to make it official with the help from World Wide Web Consortium, but advertisers and other third parties are refusing the deal.

Read More
227 Words | 1 Pages

The NBC video “How Your Every Move Can Be Tracked Digitally” really opened my eyes on how much vital information is collected daily about us on our electronic devices. As technology, has grown and seems to be the way of the future more research must be done to keep our privacy private. People have grown concern about the ability to determine what we want to share and what we refuse to share. The way your tracking information is used has pro’s and con’s. A positive aspect would be the customer demographic accommodates to the individual person’s interest and likes.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

Jim Harper’s article “It's Modern Trade- Web Users Get as Much as They Give” discusses the concern of web trackers and their methods of obtaining a person’s personal information from a website online. This article brought to light a different mechanism of how our privacy can be taken from us in the form of internet cookies. Web trackers utilize these cookies to “customize” a person’s experience while on the internet, however little does the average person know that the “customized” experience comes at a price. According to Harper, “Cookies have been integral to Web browsing since the beginning, and their privacy consequences have been a subject of public discussion for over a decade” (Harper 2).

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

That's my tracker,” by Peter Maass and Megha Rajagopalan they talk about how every personal information that a citizen has safe on their phone is not safe and that their phones are in danger. In the article, they mention how “1.3 million of call data was collected”. Millions of cell phone users have been swept up in government surveillance of their calls. That proves that cell phone companies have definitely been watching our every move and how our phones have obviously become like our personal trackers. In the article, they also mention how “Cellular systems constantly check and record the location of all phones on their networks – and this data is particularly treasured by police departments and online advertisers” this obviously shows that the government is able to obtain private information from citizens.

Read More
1716 Words | 7 Pages

Face recognition technology [1] is the least intrusive and fastest biometric technology. It works with the most obvious individual identifier – the human face. Instead of requiring people to place their hand on a reader (a process not acceptable in some cultures as well as being a source of illness transfer) or precisely position their eye in front of a scanner, face recognition systems unobtrusively take pictures of people 's faces as they enter a defined area. There is no intrusion or delay, and in most cases the subjects are entirely unaware of the process. They do not feel "under surveillance" or that their privacy has been invaded.

Read More
1377 Words | 6 Pages

The companies also sell people’s private information to make a profit, which is making people’s private life into a “product.” Although customized advertisements are useful for buyers and positive for corporations, targeted ads invade people’s privacy because tech companies manipulatively use people’s browser histories to endorse products, and secretly sell people’s personal information for revenue, turning individuals into

Read More
1109 Words | 5 Pages

“Once you’ve lost your privacy, you realize you’ve lost an extremely valuable thing” - Billy Graham. “Invasion of privacy is a legal term. It is used to describe a circumstance where an individual or organization knowingly intrudes upon a person. The intrusion occurs when the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as in a bathroom or locker room”(Winston). There are many factors that help with the loss of privacy these days.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Internet Privacy

Related Topics

Open Document