Aaron Hernandez was convicted of first degree murder on June 26, 2013. Proving that he is innocent of killing his friend, Odin Lloyde, is why I am here. I have proof that they had nothing but theories and that I know the realization of what really went on. Aaron, I could say, was just in the wrong place at the wrong time when this incident occurred. The evidence that police had used on him to pin him was marijuana. They said that he DNA was on the marijuana along with Odin’s. A second thing they pin him with was a gun that was found in another woman’s car.
The police tried to look all over city surveillance and Aaron’s home cameras to see what they could find of the crime. What they found was Aaron leaving his house with Odin but ended up returning without him. The police said there was something black in his hand when he returned. They try to push that the “something” was a gun. Aaron was with two other people that night who could have had a gun or even could have been a
…show more content…
Aaron could have dropped Odin off anywhere before he went home alone. Odin could have even left Aaron way before he decided to head home by himself.
When the police found the bullet to the gun they said there was a bit of blue gum on the shell case. They tried to point it straight towards Aaron even when they could not get a DNA sample from it because it was dry for a while. So why would they point it towards Aaron if they could not pull DNA from the gum? That would be because he seemed like a good fall back guy.
The lawyers tried to also blame two other good friends to Aaron, Ernest Wallace and Carlos Ortiz. Once they got them in to talk the police used peer pressure to get these two, to say what the police wanted to hear when it was not even true. So why would they do that, they would do that because, like I said before, Aaron is a fall back