ipl-logo

Arguments Against Affirmative Action

1454 Words6 Pages

Affirmative Action
The use of race as a factor in the process of college admissions has been and continues to be a hotly debated topic. Every high school that has taken a basic civics class has most likely heard of affirmative action. Even if they aren’t entirely familiar with the name “affirmative action” many are familiar with the goal of these programs whether they know it or not. Affirmative action is a Government (or private) program designed to redress historic injustices against specific groups by making special efforts to provide members of these groups with access to educational and employment opportunities (“Affirmative Action: Crash Course Government and Politics #32.”). Although much of what we hear about affirmative action as high …show more content…

Although companies and institutions that receive federal funding were required to have affirmative action programs, many believe that quota programs were the wrong way to go about doing it. With quota programs, there was the potential that minority candidates would be picked over more qualified candidates simply for the sake of meeting the admissions quota. Since the passing of E.O 11246, in order to be qualified for the benefits of affirmative action, one must meet two requirements. First, one has to be a member of a group that has been historically underrepresented at that place of employment or academic institution; also, one must otherwise be qualified for the job or enrollment (West). The problem with quota programs is by admitting minority students to a limited pool of positions just to fill a quota, over those who are more qualified, they violate the second requirement of affirmative action since they would not “otherwise be qualified” for enrollment over the other students. Because of this, in 1978, after receiving his second rejection letter from the University of California Davis Medical School, a man by the name of Allan Bakke, who was a very qualified candidate, sued the U.C Davis on the basis that their quota program violated his rights. The court decided that quota programs were a failed means of upholding affirmative action and ruled that it was a violation of the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment. In the end, U.C Davis and many other schools ended their quota programs in favor of a more holistic means of assessing candidates in which race did play a factor --thus still adhering to the affirmative action laws-- but not as severe as in quota programs (Colonial Williamsburg’s Nutshell History: Affirmative

Open Document