ipl-logo

Why We Should Be Banned From College Admissions

530 Words3 Pages

People always contemplate whether college admissions are fair. Some schools believe that admissions should be completely merit-based whereas other schools believe that admissions should be primarily merit-based but allow racial preferences to be favored over others with the same credentials. Racial preferences in admissions are one of the most common talked about topics among education in the Supreme Court. The plan for college admissions was to incorporate affirmative action, which is “the policy of favoring members of a disadvantaged group who are perceived to suffer from discrimination within a culture.” Many people think that affirmative action should be banned from college admissions to give each student a fair chance. The purpose of affirmative action was to create a fairness to all applicants. It has created an unfair …show more content…

It was to ensure that applicants were treated without regard to their race. People believe that admissions now discriminate in favor of racial minorities, which has caused Americans to say that “being white was a disadvantage in itself.” Instead of creating an equal opportunity it has caused certain ethnicities to be favored over others. These affirmative action plans cause people to feel unfair disadvantages in admissions. There is evidence proving admissions are now discriminating in favor of racial minorities. In admissions today a student of racial preference with the equivalent grades of a white student is now accepted over the white student to create diversity and not show favorability towards Caucasian ethnicities. Doing this, they are now favoring one student over another because of ethnicities. By making all applications racially anonymous there is no room to be favorable of one ethnicity and to ensure the equality of all student’s

Show More
Related
197 Words | 1 Pages

In the end the Supreme Court supported the lawfulness of affirmative action, but restricted its practice. The court’s ruling

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

The article is accessible to anyone and is intended to inform the United States citizens who wish to learn more about court cases regarding education. There is no bias present in the article, but it creates a controversial argument to whether or not this is the correct way to determine a student’s college qualification. For example, Justice Alito argued that “the use of racial preferences is unnecessary to achieve the goal of diversity because the admissions process could use a race-neutral holistic review based on life experiences that would achieve the same effect” (“Fisher v. University of Texas”), meaning there are more ways to promote a diverse educational environment without including race as a deciding factor for each

Read More
1629 Words | 7 Pages

We have seen in the past four decades race-based affirmative action programs that have arisen and fitfully developed through judicial challenges. As in most case, the best of intentions do not always lead to positive outcomes. Nothing could be more apt in describing the perilous position we have bestowed upon millions of minority students who have been admitted to higher learning institutions under the auspices of diversity. As illustrated by the standardized test and GPA numbers in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the students admitted to the medical school of UC-Davis under their affirmative action policy were extraordinarily less qualified when compared to the student body as a whole. This not only unfairly displaced white and Asian students who would have otherwise been admitted to those spot on merit but also places those underperforming students in an environment in which they are destined to fail.

Read More
1060 Words | 5 Pages

Part III applies the Court’s precedent to the University’s affirmative action policy and concludes that the policy violates the Equal Protection Clause. Part IV examines the impact of Fisher II on existing affirmative action policies and concludes that the Court’s holding will be narrowly crafted and thus negligibly impact other policies. In addition, Part IV asserts that the Court’s affirmative action jurisprudence should be fundamentally altered because it fails to adequately guide lower courts, legislatures, and litigants concerning the permissible scope of affirmative action policies. As discussed in Part IV, a more effective—and honest—approach would be to acknowledge that: (1) diversity is an essential part of ensuring inclusion in higher education and the workplace; (2) remedying past discrimination is a compelling state interest; and (3) in limited circumstances race may be a dispositive factor in the admissions or hiring process. The Court’s current framework, although well-intentioned, ignores these realities and tries to quantify the role of race in admissions – a task that is impossible and

Read More
1802 Words | 8 Pages

In the article, “The Truth about ‘holistic College Admissions”, Sara Harberson expresses how universities that are not allowed to use racial preferences on college admissions, are still devising strategies to work around the laws to produce the same result. Harberson states how the institutions are using what is called “holistic admissions”, which allows a college to factor in a student's background, race and income. By filtering out the minority groups, they are creating a less-diverse community, preventing students of certain backgrounds from a proper education, and taking away opportunities from students based on their ethnicity. Colleges are using racial segregation in the admission process so that they can have a white-favoring campus

Read More
2018 Words | 9 Pages

Introduction The case of Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, and centers on the University of North Carolina's use of race in its admissions policies. The petitioner, Students for Fair Admissions, have brought claims alleging that the university's use of race discriminates against Asian American applicants in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and federal civil rights statutes, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The legal issues before the Supreme Court include whether the university's use of race in admissions decisions is constitutional under the Equal Protection Clause, whether the university has a compelling interest

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

Gratz and Hull are not alone on the defense side of affirmative action. In his article “University Affirmative Action Admissions Policies Are Toxic,” Robert Cherry asserts that “affirmative action admissions policies disportionately accept students with lower-than-average test score and grades. As a result, they are not adequately prepared for the rigors of top-tier universities.” In making this comment, Cherry clearly favors for affirmative action to be taken out of higher education. He supports his argument with data that suggest that minorities are not performing as well as whites because some colleges lower their standards in order to accept more minorities.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

The main precedent that has stuck with the court from Bakke to now Fisher is that a diverse student body is a compelling enough interest for a university to pursue. This goal is to be carried out in a narrowly tailored manner which the court has accepted as a race-conscious admissions program. The program is deemed constitutional on the basis that it only uses race as a plus factor in the admissions process. These programs, however, run in stark contrast to the provisions set forth in the Equal Protection Clause; in which the state is not allowed to treat individuals differently based on the category of race. The race-conscious admissions program albeit better than a pure quota system still uses race as a crucial factor.

Read More
1322 Words | 6 Pages

Imagine getting accepted into your dream college, because of your race, now imagine getting denied for the same reason. Although it may seem unlikely, Race conscious admissions is a recurring problem across America. In early years, the African-American community wasn’t represented in educational facilities, (John H. Bunzel 49) but after some peaceful protests, things started to change. In today’s world, racial equality has been the topic of discussion, due to many incidents. Although times have changed, some might say, there are still some minor issues.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

Although colleges attempt to justify how they segregate and treat applicants differently due to their race, they cannot deny that this ultimately creates an environment in which certain students are held to unfair standards on account of factors that they cannot control. Despite this,

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Affirmative Action has lowered the standards of colleges and job requirements to help meet the requirements. Perazzo (2001) provides a good example of the lower standard, “At UCLA Law School in 1994, a black applicant with a college G.P.A. between 2.5 and 3.5, and an LSAT score between 60 and 90, had a 61 percent chance of admission. The corresponding rates for similarly qualified Asians and whites were 7 percent and 1 percent, respectively.” It is time to move the standards upward and allow all people to compete for college admission or jobs and use race or gender as a tiebreaker.

Read More
1484 Words | 6 Pages

Debates over racial discrimination have been going on since the beginning of America’s existence as a land of freedom. Today, arguments over racial microaggressions and affirmative action continue to plague our country. Affirmative action is a hotly contested racial consideration program that favors certain minorities in college admissions and the workplace. Some argue that any consideration of race discriminates against the majority and violates the Equal Protections Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, while others contend that it takes into consideration the disadvantages suffered by typically lower-class minority families and makes up for past discrimination against minorities. By upholding affirmative action, the Supreme Court ignored data

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

l Affirmative action was intended to increase the access of education and job opportunities for members of groups that are, historically discriminated against, affirmative action programs try to ensure that minorities get extra special access to jobs and schools, which, for many people, there is not equal opportunity. Affirmative action, even the playing field because it allows those who have the same potential as whites to receive better jobs or a better education to prepare themselves to be qualified to enter the workforce. Affirmative action has helped in the progress of women of all colors in the United States as we can clearly see how they are CEO’s of major companies, therefore this program was not simply put in place for blacks

Read More
223 Words | 1 Pages

It is there to protect you but it is lopsided in the public eye. In the past years, affirmative action has been mostly used on admissions to a university. California voted in 1996 to get rid of race as being a factor to be admitted to a university. In 2008, Abigail Fisher took her case of not being admitted to The University of Texas

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

Affirmative action policies command attention because they tap into basic debates about fairness. As a nation, we say we are committed to fairness, but our history of achieving fairness for all individuals, regardless of race, ethnicity or gender, has been far from perfect. Any policy that reminds us of the difference between

Read More

More about Why We Should Be Banned From College Admissions

Related Topics

Open Document