Summary Of The Fisher V. University Of Texas Supreme Court Case

The Fisher v. University of Texas Supreme Court Case (argued in 2015) involves how race affects college admissions and how a certain student reacted to it. The purpose of the article is to inform the audience about the use of race in college admissions without considering the effect on the students. The argument made in the article is that the documentation of race does not violate any laws declared in the United States Constitution (“Fisher v. University of Texas”). A white female student, Abigail Fisher, was denied admission to the University of Texas because she did not qualify for the Top Ten Percent Plan. The plan automatically admits a student if they graduated in the top ten percent of their high school class. When Fisher discovered that Texas University considers race as a factor while selecting the top ten percent, she sued the University because she believed it “violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment” (“Fisher v. University of Texas”). When the district court held that the process was constitutional, Fisher took the case to the Supreme Court, where the verdict was that the University’s

The article is accessible to anyone and is intended to inform the United States citizens who wish to learn more about court cases regarding education. There is no bias present in the article, but it creates a controversial argument to whether or not this is the correct way to determine a student’s college qualification. For example, Justice Alito argued that “the use of racial preferences is unnecessary to achieve the goal of diversity because the admissions process could use a race-neutral holistic review based on life experiences that would achieve the same effect” (“Fisher v. University of Texas”), meaning there are more ways to promote a diverse educational environment without including race as a deciding factor for each