Animal testing has been around for centuries. Early scientists performed experiments on animals to test out certain medicine and surgical procedures before applying them to human patients. Animal testing eventually became a huge controversy in the following years. The ongoing animal testing debate has caused many journalists to write their own point of view on the entire controversy. Journalists such as; Iza Iglesias and Lorna Collier. Iza Iglesias and Lorna Collier both discuss their viewpoints on animal testing and provides evidence to support their argument. In the article, “ 8 million signatures needed in fight against animal testing”, Iglesias argues against animal testing while Collier defends it in her article titled, “Defending animal …show more content…
The use of pathos is definitely shown at the beginning of the article, but not through out. When Iglesias states, “The animals usually end up being put down after a matter of days, or if they keep going, weeks or even years in such horrific conditions”(Iglesias 1), then “As such, in 1989 British brand The Body Shop became the very first international beauty brand to campaign against the practice of animal testing in cosmetics, in partnership with Cruelty Free International”(Iglesias 1), she shifts the main focus of the article. Iglesias discusses different companies fighting against animal testing rather than discussing the negative effects of animal experimentation. The rest of the article consists of quotes from different people. For instance, Iglesias quoted, '"No animal should get tested for the sake or expense of cosmetics especially since we value our own lives. We should also value theirs," Stockinger stated”(Iglesias 1). When Iglesias quotes Vanessa Matsunaga, a brazilian model, throughout the article, she steers the readers farther away from the main purpose of the article . Iglesias restates Matsunaga, “Manila-based Brazilian model Vanessa Matsunaga said that companies should find other alternatives in testing their products without having to harm animals”(Iglesias 1). A brazilian model speaking on using animals for …show more content…
Collier does not start her article by grabbing the reader 's attention, but she soon gets straight to the main idea. Collier mentions how animal experimentation is necessary and beneficial to human beings. Collier states, “This is an important part of animal research because one of the big limitations in human neuroscience and human psychology is that yes, we can image the brain, but we can 't see it at a microscopic level”(Collier 40). The reader will begin to understand how animal research is extremely important when examining human organs. Collier also states, “Rodent brains are made of the same mechanisms as human brains — the same kind of cells, the same kind of neurotransmitters or chemicals”(Collier 40), to give the readers more crucial evidence as to why animal research is necessary. One tends to pay more mind to issues that can possibly affect them in a negative way, Collier does well with capturing the reader 's attention when mentioning human health. In modern day, animal research is seen as cruel and undergoes tons of criticism. Collier covers many animal harm concerns by stating, “When there is potential for pain — for example an experiment that involves surgery — researchers use anesthetics and analgesics”(Collier 40). Collier then comforts ones concern for animal safety by mentioning, “All of our research is supervised by practicing veterinarians who know the state of the art. It 's