ipl-logo

Arguments Against Euthanasia In The United States

984 Words4 Pages

Euthanasia is the termination of an extremely ill person’s life in order to relieve them from the suffering the illness is causing. Euthanasia is usually only conducted on a person with an incurable condition, however there are other instances when euthanasia can be carried out. In many countries, such as the UK, it is illegal to assist anyone in killing themselves. Should a terminally ill patient in a great deal of pain and discomfort be allowed to terminate their life, if that is what the patient desires? And who has the right to deny a patient who is in complete suffering a less painful ending to their lives? These questions cause a huge amount of controversy, and have been strongly debated. Those in favor of euthanasia argue that it should …show more content…

Many supporters of voluntary euthanasia believe that everyone has the right to control their body and life, and should be free to decide at what time, and in which manner they will die. The idea behind this is that unnecessary restraints on human rights should be avoided. It was said in an article in the Independent newspaper in March 2002, that; “In cases where there are no dependents who might exert pressure one way or the other, the right of the individual to choose should be paramount. So long as the patient is lucid, and his or her intent is clear beyond doubt, there need be no further questions.” Since the right to life gives a person the right to not be killed if they do not want to, proponents of euthanasia argue that respect for this right will prevent euthanasia being misused, as killing a patient without their permission would violate their human rights. It can also be argued that because death is a private matter, if there is no harm to any other people, there is no right to deny someone ‘s wish to die. Supporters of this believe that if euthanasia promotes the best interests of all the parties concerned, and no human rights are violated, then it is morally acceptable for voluntary euthanasia to take

Show More
Related
677 Words | 3 Pages

For this reason, they contend, dying people should have the right to control the timing of their death and should be permitted to obtain a doctor's help in doing so.” Terminally ill people who do not have the option of physician assisted suicide have to go through an extremely painful and slow death. They should have the right to control when they can be put out of their misery. Nobody should be forced to suffer, and PAS is a relief from suffering. Accoding to “Physician-Assisted Suicide Should Be Legalized”, “The physician's obligations are many but, when cure is impossible and palliation has failed to achieve its objectives, there is always a residual obligation to relieve suffering.

Read More
636 Words | 3 Pages

However, the wording of this ethic has left room for interpretation. Many argue that prolonging the life of terminally-ill patients suffering pain constitutes doing harm and that ending the patient’s life would be the correct course of action. My personal view on euthanasia is that although it is a difficult choice, in principle a terminally ill patient has the choice to end his life in a timely and peaceful manner. However, the legislation required to write it into law must be drafted very carefully in a way that protects terminally ill patients from pressure and involuntary euthanasia, and must properly define the boundary between sick and terminally ill patients.

Read More
1583 Words | 7 Pages

The foundations of the ethical and moral arguments found in discourse over individual rights battles can be traced back to the modern founders of these principals. In today’s society, physician-assisted suicide garners great concern over morality and ethics within Western medicine. Medical advances now have the ability to extend life or even keep the patient’s body alive even when the brain is essentially dead. In recent years, an increased emphasis on respect toward patient autonomy begs whether or not there is solid reason to decline physician-assisted suicide. For many, physician-assisted suicide may be the rational choice for a dying person choosing to escape unbearable suffering at the end of life.

Read More
2330 Words | 10 Pages

Physician assisted suicide and or euthanasia is a major ethical dilemma in both the medical and political atmospheres. With a multitude of arguments on both sides it can be hard to conclude for yourself exactly where to stand ethically when it comes to euthanasia. Moreover, it is important to think independently and separate your own personal beliefs from medical decisions. Secondly, it is essential to respect the choices people make for themselves or their loved ones. While physician assisted suicide goes against many people's beliefs, it is more important to protect someone's bodily autonomy (or, to put it more bluntly, freedom) than to cater to a particular value system that is not shared by everyone.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

The main purpose of this chapter is to identify the arguments in favour and against assisted dying and to set out a framework of safeguards that would accompany any changes in legislation. This chapter will help show how the concerns regarding the legalisation of assisted dying are outweighed by the arguments in favour of a change in legislation. One of the strongest and most compelling arguments in favour of assisted dying draws on the importance of autonomy and individual liberty; in a liberal state individual freedoms must be respected, “the right to determine what shall be done with one’s own body is a fundamental right in our society” (Tiensuu,2015, p259). In the UK, people generally have the right to make their own decisions about how

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

But there continues to be adverse reactions concentrated towards the practice. After reading and comprehending the controversies of the topic, I have come to a firm belief that terminal patients should have the right to control their death through the use of assisted suicide when faced with

Read More
410 Words | 2 Pages

I understand that they are in severe pain but if you just kill/euthanize them, then you are denying them of their final stage of growth and what lesson(s) they are going to learn at the final stages of their life .Because I think that it is during a terminal and incurable illness or something that you know is going to change your life,that people actually sit down and think about the way they have lived their life, think about the wrongs that they have done, and think of how they are going to prepare themselves, their family, and loved ones for their death. Not all people make use of this opportunity, but the ones that do usually try to build up or maybe even rebuild their relationships with their loved ones, and this opportunity will somehow give them a greater purpose in life. Therefore we should recognize the importance of the patient.so in conclusion euthanasia should be illegal and you should also know that God does not give anyone more than they can handle and that life is a sacred gift that god gave us because we deserved it and even I you are not religious or you do not believe in god life is still a sacred thing that should be appreciated and not abused. Therefore euthanasia should not be legal anywhere in the

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

The homicide laws in all 50 United States prohibit euthanasia. On one side of the controversy are the “Care not Killing” supporters who believe that euthanasia is an ethical issue; and on the other side the “Death with Dignity” advocates believe it to be a mercy killing. The right to choose how to end one's life is a choice that only they can make. A small percentage of Americans believe that Euthanasia is a moral and ethical problem.

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

And I want to die on my own terms” (p. 1). If given the choice, a person should be able to decide how they die. People do not enjoy seeing themselves become weak and helpless; no one should get to tell them how they die. People who are against euthanasia believe that it goes against all medical ethics and should not be legal anywhere, however, a doctors job is to help and provide care to patients. If they need help in having a simple peaceful death before they get so sick they are a completely different person, they should be given that

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

The fourth common Western argument in favor of euthanasia is the argument of self-determination. According to the precious Western value of autonomy, the individual must be free to decide on the things that matter much to him or her. As decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, education, etc. The decision on how and when to die is one of the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime. Therefore we have the right to die; some even claim that it is a human right, a negative right (the corresponding obligation is non-intervention in suicide attempts) and a positive law (which is suicide correlative duty of care).

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Euthanasia, should be used when needed or wanted by a patient though. Some patients could have a fatal and slow disease and want it to end already, so it would be their decision to go already. Even if their family doesn’t approve of it, it’s for the patient to decide, depending on their autonomy. If they don’t have the ability to decide, it still isn’t the family’s choice. The patient most likely left a living will, which tells the hospital what treatment the patient would want to have should they not be able to tell them.

Read More
2011 Words | 9 Pages

Euthanasia has been one of the controversial debates in medical history due to many dilemmas that surround religious, ethical and practical matters. Euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide is defined as the act of ending a person’s life either by their own conscious decision or decision made by a legal guardian to end a person’s suffering. Euthanasia is viewed as an act of murder or manslaughter and is punishable by law. According to the terms of suicide act (1961), the act of deliberately ending someone’s life is deemed illegal in the United Kingdom and for anyone who encourages this will lead to sentence up to 14 years. However, an attempt for an individual to end their life is not a criminal act.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Do you assent that people who encounter some fatal diseases and do not want to endure pain can have voluntary euthanasia? Voluntary euthanasia, the practice of a hopelessly ailing and suffering person asking for terminating the life in a relatively rapid and painless manner, has been the most controversial moot point that spawns numerous discussions in the recent few decades. I propose that voluntary euthanasia should be legalized so that anyone who struggles for the desperate disease can have the right of practicing voluntary euthanasia. Every individual has liberty and is an autonomous person with the right to self-sufficiency and independence.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

There are many different opinions about euthanasia and if it should be legalized. If Euthanasia gets legalized

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

A controversial practice that invokes a debate over how beneficial its intentions are is the use of euthanasia. The argument switches between whether or not putting terminally ill patients to death with the assistance of a physician is justifiable and right. Legalizing the practice of euthanasia is a significant topic among many people in society, including doctors and nurses in the medical field, as it forces people to decide where to draw the line between relieving pain and simply killing. While some people see euthanasia as a way to helping a patient by eliminating their pain, it is completely rejected by others who see it as a method of killing.

Read More

More about Arguments Against Euthanasia In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document