Arguments Against Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide

932 Words4 Pages

The homicide laws in all 50 United States prohibit euthanasia. On one side of the controversy are the “Care not Killing” supporters who believe that euthanasia is an ethical issue; and on the other side the “Death with Dignity” advocates believe it to be a mercy killing. The right to choose how to end one's life is a choice that only they can make.
A small percentage of Americans believe that Euthanasia is a moral and ethical problem. Some may say it is an issue of sanctity and privacy. Dr. George Delgado stated, “Physician-Assisted Suicide does damage to a patient...sacred trust between physician and patient, which should be based on healing, not based on killing.” The power to have control over one’s fate is sometimes a powerful medicine. The trust is not in life or death, the trust is in removing pain. The AMA released a letter that stated, “Physician-assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible …show more content…

The bond that a physician and a patient have is strong. For a physician to see their patient in unimaginable pain is complete agony.
I support euthanasia because sometimes it is the only way out of a painful and terrifying death. People against euthanasia are willing to allow people to live a life that is worse than death. A glioblastoma patient named Brittany Maynard said, “I wish there was a cure for my disease but there's not... My glioblastoma is going to kill me, and that's out of my control.” She is clearly aware of her situation and understands her disease will end her life. “I've discussed with many experts how I would die from it,