ipl-logo

Arguments Against Gun Control

1392 Words6 Pages

As stated by the Second Amendment, firearms are an inalienable right given to Americans. Therefore, taking away this right would completely obliterate the ideas that this country was founded upon. The founding fathers foresaw future generations being able to protect themselves from the inevitable. Firearms have a presence in many people’s lives, whether it be as a tool, hobby, or protection. Consequently, legislation surrounding firearms has become a recent argument considering the many uses for them and the specific ways they are being used today. Banning firearms would do more harm than good for a number of reasons since firearms are used as a defense mechanism it would be a violation of the second amendment, and guns don't kill people, people …show more content…

The average firearm owner possesses the need for a gun for self-defense, while others may hold malicious intent. In total, the United States has about 270,000,000 firearms or about 88.8 firearms per 100 citizens. 22% of them own more than one gun, which shows how many are in circulation (“Background”). However, firearm ownership not an invitation to own an unlimited amount of firearms, which thus has put into place gun control laws. Gun control laws, strict or not, are meant to regulate the areas in which firearms can be carried, who can carry them, where they can be purchased, and a varying number of other reasons depending on the state. Therefore, gun control is one of the most widely known debates across the nation, so should the right to own a firearm be infringed …show more content…

Understanding the Amendment and what it stands for can be highly controversial and misinterpreted seeing as how it deals with both understanding of the American Constitution and protection of one's life. The confiscation of citizen’s guns would most certainly violate the Amendment, however, the types of firearms are regulated under laws. This is where the situation can become opinionated and controversial because the Amendment does not just give anyone and everyone the right to own whatever firearms they want. Consequently, the line is blurred differentiating between allowing the who and what of firearm ownership. The banishment of all firearms would in no way, shape or form stop all gun violence. For instance with the war on drugs, just because these narcotics are illegal does not mean people do not have access to them and use

Show More
Related
1485 Words | 6 Pages

One of the most debatable issues in the U.S. today is the issue of gun control and how people should go about modernizing the forces surrounding citizens ' power to have and employ firearms. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution ensures that people have the ability to own and carry weapons. Others contend that this provision should be kept in place, despite numerous individuals saying it should be amended or removed. There are several reasons why the Second Amendment should be amended or abolished, according to those who make this argument.

Read More
1438 Words | 6 Pages

The constitution gives United States citizens the right to bear arms and should not be infringed upon. If guns are banned then the black market and crime rate will be way worse, drugs are illegal and people can get them as they please, if firearms are banned people will do the same. Mental health is an even bigger issue than the guns themselves, if someone commits a mass murder there is something wrong with that individual and they are not mentally stable. People pull the trigger, the weapons do not fire

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

The debate of gun control laws and if they should be strengthened or laxer, has been in effect for a very long time. According to

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Gun control argument is one of the argument that is discussed right now. From 1776, when this nation was founded, American people have been using the guns for many reasons such as hunting, self-defence, and killing. At this time American people are facing both danger and advantage of guns. Not only governors , but also all American people have to deal with this problem for their

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of gun control and firearm regulation has been subject to heated debate for a long while. Both sides have potent arguments, however the core of this issue ultimately boils down to the constitution itself. More specifically the second amendment. This argument quickly becomes quite complicated because gun control and firearm regulation concerns not only the right of citizens, but more importantly the safety of citizens. The second amendment helps to guarantee an imperative right belonging to all citizens.

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

The Intense Debate of Gun Control Over the last few years, gun control in the United States has been an intense debate throughout the political arena. Although, as American citizens, the second amendment of the constitution gives all citizens the rights to bear arms, gun control is still an overwhelming deliberate. Like all civil and political consideration, this nation allows all individuals the rights of freedom of speech and critical thinking. Therefore, one will continuously have two sides to this intense debate.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

The biggest issue of banning guns is not only this trivial aspect which I just mentioned, is the entire smuggling network there would be evolving guns. The police also state that robbers would create a huge black market selling people, drugs, and many other objects to eventually buy guns. After all this chaos is established, the government wouldn’t be able to do anything to avoid guns, as they will be all illegal, crime rate percentages would leap, and America's developed nation would slowly lose its

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

Today in the United States of America, the gun control is the top issue. Over 350 people die from gun shooting accidents, which results in the president to review the second amendment, the right to carry a concealed handgun (“Police one” internet). The citizens of the United States find it their right to bear arms, however guns get in the wrong hands. In order to carry a weapon, people must have a weapon license, and required an intensive background check to obtain the weapon. More often than not concealed handguns have a negative effect on society than positive.

Read More
1072 Words | 5 Pages

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution grants its’ citizens the right to keep and bear arms. Though the Second Amendment addresses the legality of owning a firearm, the morality of owning a gun is left as an unanswered question. Since the right to bear arms is not a fundamental right and guns cause harm to innocent people, it is my position that the government should endorse stricter gun control measures, particularly automatic and semiautomatic weapons. In this paper I will argue my position of abolition by examining both premises in depth, discussing the role and duty of the government, and addressing an objection to my position.

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

One of the most controversial issues our nation faces today is gun control laws. This controversy has been created due to the different interpretations of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution which states the right of citizens to bear arms; “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell Law School). Anti-gun control laws believe that the amendment guarantees the right to bear any kind of firearms. On the other hand, we have does that believe that more controls laws should be implemented since the 2nd amendment was for the right of States to have an armed militia during wartime. Both sides have strong point, however, the safety of our children comes first, and a firearm means death in the wrong hands.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

One of those points being that if one could find a way to actually ban guns and get rid of them so that no one anywhere could have access to a firearm, murder rates as well as maybe even crime would decrease simply because guns make it so much easier to do both of those things. Guns are dangerous and used in the wrong hands can bring destruction to anyone unlucky enough to be involved, including whoever is using the gun. The idea of Gun Control and what it means can vary widely, with big issue being what it would actually accomplish, if anything. One thing to consider with gun safety in mind is that in Chicago, Illinois, which has the most strict laws in the whole of the entire country, has the highest percentage of gun violence in the whole of the United States (Stell).

Read More
1038 Words | 5 Pages

The news has recently been flooded with reports of mass shootings and murders happening in all parts of the country. These stories have terrorized the nation and have made it apparent that something needs to be done concerning gun control. The Second Amendment is often misquoted and misinterpreted. It does not say that the right of the people to own guns should not be infringed upon; it says that citizens should be allowed to own firearms within a well-regulated militia to better defend the State. So, it is not the right of the American people to own as many guns as they please, but it is to own firearms in a controlled manner so that they may better protect themselves.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Closing statement: The debate about gun control is inappropriate, because it does not go far enough. Only a completely ban of privately owned firearms can help drastically reduce the number of firearms related deaths and save countless lives. Without a doubt, the proposition of a complete ban of firearms will be met with fierce opposition. Critics will point at their eagerness to hunt, shoot for recreational purposes, and use guns for self-defense. However, recreational hunting and target practice are hardly basic rights that must be preserved at all costs.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

To begin with, the second amendment of the US constitution gives citizens the right to carry or possess a gun. As a result, gun violence in America has increased drastically over the years due to guns being utilised in a reprehensible manner and people getting wedged in the crossfire, hence why stringent law enforcements need to be put in place regarding guns in the US. “Since 1982, there have been at least 61 mass murders carried out with firearms; in most cases, the killers had obtained their weapons legally”.

Read More

More about Arguments Against Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document