ipl-logo

Arguments Against Standardized Testing

1141 Words5 Pages

Drilling Instead of Teaching
Standardized testing, is a form of testing that all takers must take and answer the same questions and is scored in a standard manner, and these scores make it possible to score in a consistent manner. These tests can be administered in countless forms as multiple choice, true or false, short essay question and numerous forms. I hope to prove that standardized testing is not the way to learn about the child's capability of learning or comprehension. Standardized testing has placed a burden on the state education budget, focusing so much time on reading and math that we negate other subjects and the mental anguish it places on the students. Being an educator myself, seeing it often day in; day out. Students have …show more content…

“Educators are experiencing almost relentless pressure to show their effectiveness. Unfortunately, the chief indicator by which utmost communities judge a school staff's success is student performance on standardized achievement tests,” as stated by Popham. There needs to be a method where we have a necessity to find the answers to not only drill the same answers on a test like memorization, but on excelling on mastery of knowledge in all …show more content…

There are those that would say "Teaching to the test" can be a moral device because it focuses on essential content and skills, eliminates time-wasting activities that do not produce learning gains, and motivates students to excel. However, higher learning is taken over by vast amounts of test preparations and that can result in our future scholars being great at test taking but not preparing them for adulthood and that can be a catastrophic reality

Open Document