Arguments Against Standardized Testing

730 Words3 Pages

Standardized Testing The date is 1 June, 2016 and it is exam week. The time of the year where the Carteret County School Board, Croatan High School Administration and teachers are depending on students for the school's, teacher’s, administration and board’s reputation for the upcoming year. Will the school be in the top ten again? Will they be an “A+” school? This all depends on the students. I know I’m under stress, I wonder if anyone has taken the time to consider the amount of stress the students and teachers are under? The state tells the school administration that if test scores are not “favorable,” their accreditation will be pulled and they will bring shame to the community. Then, this puts pressure on the administration and results …show more content…

According to Phillip Harris, Joan Harris and Bruce Smith, “Gerald Bracey's (an American education policy researcher) lists some of the biggies that are generally not measured in standardized tests: creativity, critical thinking, resilience, motivation, persistence, curiosity, endurance, reliability, enthusiasm, empathy, self-awareness, self-discipline, leadership, civic-mindedness, courage, compassion, resourcefulness, sense of beauty, sense of wonder, honesty, and integrity.” If all of these attributes that reflect success are not tested, why are standardized tests, such as SAT and ACT, so important towards college acceptance? These college entry exams inadvertently create reasons for students to be superficial thinkers and ignore the characteristics that lead to success. According to Popham, “Between 50 and 80 percent of what was measured on the Final Course Exam tests was not suitably addressed in the classroom textbook’s.” Not only are students not being tested on the attributes of success but they are also, for the most part, not being tested on what they are learning in the classroom. Standardized tests are a terrible use of measuring students’ abilities, and therefore has led to being a problem with measuring teachers abilities in the …show more content…

Standardized tests are said to be the easiest and most efficient way to determine if teachers have taught standards and whether or not students have met standards, but the tests are not a fair measurement. According to Popham, “Employing standardized achievement tests to ascertain educational quality is like measuring temperature with a tablespoon. Tablespoons have a different measurement mission than indicating how hot or cold something is. Standardized achievement tests have a different measurement mission than indicating how good or bad a school/teacher is.” There is too much room for error to determine if a teacher is considered “good” or “bad.” For instance, you may have a great teacher, but the student may be completely unwilling to learn. Another example is a student may not be in the best state of mind the day they take the test: not feeling well, broke up with boyfriend/girlfriend, had a fight with their parent, etc. According to Valerie Strauss, “Standardized achievement tests provide minimal to no useful feedback to classroom teachers and radically limit teacher ability to adapt to learner differences.” Teachers are not receiving feedback from these standardized tests; therefore, they cannot address where the students deficiencies are.. Due to the lack of feedback,